Skip to main content

1-20 of 32 results for subject:Redundancy

Session X
2012-13
Subject X
Tax evasion

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Tax evasion (32)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I am grateful for hon. Members’ attendance this morning at this debate about HMRC and its capacity and resources. Over the past decade or so, tax debates in Westminster Hall have usually been attended by the usual public administration anoraks—a club that I am a member of—or failed accountants who...

Member
John McDonnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 February 2013
Reference
558 cc1-2WH
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman has listed a range of selective statistics, but he is well aware that tax is paid on profits, not turnover. Part and parcel of sales is VAT, so taxes other than corporation tax are involved. Does he think that a big danger in the debate is the...

Member
Mark Field (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 February 2013
Reference
558 c2WH
House
House of Commons

That is an excellent point, which goes to the heart of the debate, because I agree with the Prime Minister that much of what is happening is

morally repugnant, but the onus is on us to ensure that the system works effectively in relation to tax evasion and avoidance, and...

Member
John McDonnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 February 2013
Reference
558 c2WH
House
House of Commons

I congratulate the hon. Gentleman on obtaining the debate. Does he agree that a simpler form of tax collection is needed, in relation to administration? I understand that the UK is second to India for paperwork. Does he also agree that HMRC needs to make a radical change to its...

Member
David Simpson (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 February 2013
Reference
558 c3WH
House
House of Commons

That excellent point about simplification of our taxation system, and focusing on priorities, is made time and again, and I fully agree. We shall return to it, and perhaps new measures that the Government are presenting this year will help. However, there is no use in our introducing measures or...

Member
John McDonnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 February 2013
Reference
558 c3WH
House
House of Commons

The greater part of the hon. Gentleman’s speech is obviously about the collection service and HMRC’s resources, but as he has talked about some of the bigger companies and the accountancy firms, does he agree that it is right to consider whether each company should state on the front of...

Member
Peter Bottomley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 February 2013
Reference
558 c3WH
House
House of Commons

That is an excellent proposal. The hon. Gentleman has hit the nail on the head regarding transparency and openness. It is not only the directors; the shareholders have a responsibility as well. The veil of secrecy over tax avoidance, and the advice given on

it, undermines the opportunity for shareholders...

Member
John McDonnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 February 2013
Reference
558 cc3-4WH
House
House of Commons

Does my hon. Friend accept that it is not just about the numbers of staff but about their morale? Has he read the repeated surveys, over a number of years, that demonstrate that HMRC staff are the most demoralised anywhere in Government?

Member
Lord Mann (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 February 2013
Reference
558 c4WH
House
House of Commons

I will come on to that in due course. The expression that has been used by non-HMRC staff—observers—is that staff morale is “at rock bottom.” That was demonstrated by a recent internal Government survey, which reported that fewer than one in five staff thought that HMRC was well managed. That...

Member
John McDonnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 February 2013
Reference
558 cc4-6WH
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is right that there are more closures to follow. In my constituency, Weardale house is due to close, and in the neighbouring constituency of Sunderland Central, the closure of Shackleton and Gilbridge houses is under consultation. That is three offices and a number of staff in just...

Member
Sharon Hodgson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 February 2013
Reference
558 c6WH
House
House of Commons

I will use the example of Sunderland, because my hon. Friend has hit on a wider issue than just the impact on staff. HMRC plans to close Gilbridge and Shackleton houses, which are in the centre of Sunderland, and Weardale house next to the Washington Galleries. Some 300 staff from...

Member
John McDonnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 February 2013
Reference
558 c6WH
House
House of Commons

Does my hon. Friend agree that closing offices is a false and unfair economy, because it limits the opportunity for face-to-face discussion in settling complex tax matters, which now have to be decided by either calling a call centre, going online or writing?

Member
George Mudie (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 February 2013
Reference
558 c7WH
House
House of Commons

That is both frustrating for the person who is trying to identify what they should properly pay and counter-productive given the lost revenue to the HMRC.

Member
John McDonnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 February 2013
Reference
558 c7WH
House
House of Commons

Has my hon. Friend considered the disproportionate impact of tax office closures on traditional market towns such as Retford? Where a significant number of staff are moved out and the offices are not re-let, the consequence is that other small businesses, newsagents, cafés, and so on, get into difficulties because...

Member
Lord Mann (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 February 2013
Reference
558 c7WH
House
House of Commons

It flies in the face of all the statements by this Government and previous Governments about moving staff out of London into the regions to boost regional economies. We now have a hokey-cokey, with staff being brought in as other staff are taken out. The result is not only instability...

Member
John McDonnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 February 2013
Reference
558 cc7-10WH
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Howarth. I congratulate my hon. Friend the Member for Hayes and Harlington (John McDonnell) on securing this important debate.

In these difficult times, we are all more aware than ever of the need to pay our taxes, to pay our way,...

Member
Iain McKenzie (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 February 2013
Reference
558 cc10-1WH
House
House of Commons

I congratulate the hon. Member for Hayes and Harlington (John McDonnell) on securing the debate and his knowledge of, and campaigning on, the issue. I hope that he was not referring to me when he talked of “failed accountants”.

I am a member of the Public Accounts Committee, so I deal...

Member
Ian Swales (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 February 2013
Reference
558 cc11-2WH
House
House of Commons

I congratulate my hon. Friend the Member for Hayes and Harlington (John McDonnell) on getting the debate, which is important. I do not intend to go over the same ground as other colleagues, but some points need to be re-emphasised. I am looking forward to the Minister’s reply, and if...

Member
John Robertson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 February 2013
Reference
558 cc12-3WH
House
House of Commons

Let us cut to the chase. Among the vast number of businesses and UK taxpayers, HMRC has a not entirely undeserved reputation as a byword for incompetence, opaqueness and arbitrary action, verging on shambolic. In his passionate opening speech, the hon. Member for Hayes and Harlington (John McDonnell) expressed some...

Member
Mark Field (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 February 2013
Reference
558 cc13-5WH
House
House of Commons

I congratulate my hon. Friend the Member for Hayes and Harlington (John McDonnell) on securing this important debate. I want to start by asking why it is necessary to deal with some of the problems. In an age of austerity, particularly, every pound matters and every pound not collected means...

Member
George Mudie (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 February 2013
Reference
558 cc15-6WH
House
House of Commons