Skip to main content

1-20 of 144 results for subject:Defence

Session X
2009-10
Subject X
Helicopters

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Helicopters (144)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Defence. Fourth opposition day debate (part one). Main question negatived on division (208 to 277). Amendment agreed on question.

Lead member
Liam Fox
Answering member
Bob Ainsworth
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Opposition days
Date
1 March 2010
Reference
506 c663-720
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Gentleman—that was very helpful. The cost of the three Astute class submarines has risen from £2.5 billion to £3.8 billion, and the Type 45 destroyers are costing £1 billion each—£1.5 billion over budget in total—and are two years late. There has been a whole plethora of...

Member
Willie Rennie (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2010
Reference
506 c681
House
House of Commons

I have answered the second question, and the hon. Lady knows the answer to the first—we have been over it before. The skills base would not have been affected if we had made the decision at the beginning. We did not need to make all the decisions then, and the...

Member
Willie Rennie (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2010
Reference
506 c682
House
House of Commons

Why was the Secretary of State not prepared to give the assurance that the hon. Gentleman has been seeking from the official Opposition?

Member
Bernard Jenkin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2010
Reference
506 c703
House
House of Commons

Defence is one of the most important areas of politics, and it ought to be debated fiercely, so I am astonished that the Opposition seem to have run out of steam. There seems to be no passion, fire, drive or urge for government, and we are only—what?—two months away from...

Member
Ian Davidson (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2010
Reference
506 c702-3
House
House of Commons

I can help out the hon. Gentleman, because last Thursday I, like the Secretary of State for Defence, had the pleasure of going to Portsmouth to attend the steel-cutting ceremony for the first of the aircraft carriers. I listened carefully to the Secretary of State, who said that the Government...

Member
Julian Lewis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2010
Reference
506 c680-1
House
House of Commons

These are excellent questions, and I am sure that the hon. Gentleman will pose them to my right hon. and learned Friend the Member for North-East Fife (Sir Menzies Campbell), who is sitting behind me and who is carrying out a review on this important matter, which must be considered...

Member
Willie Rennie (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2010
Reference
506 c682
House
House of Commons

I might have missed this while I was out of the Chamber, but does my hon. Friend agree that on neither side of the House has anyone mentioned the role of civilians, such as cleaners, cooks, firefighters and logisticians? Will they, too, receive consideration in the Green Paper for the...

Member
Linda Gilroy (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2010
Reference
506 c713
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is ruling out defence cuts under the Conservatives. Will he take this opportunity to rule out closure of important strategic assets, such as RAF Lossiemouth, RAF Kinloss and RAF Leuchars?

Member
Angus Robertson (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2010
Reference
506 c709
House
House of Commons

The hon. Member for Glasgow, South-West (Mr. Davidson) suggested that this had been a lacklustre debate. I take issue with him, because the opening exchanges between my hon. Friend the Member for Woodspring (Dr. Fox)—as you know, Mr. Deputy Speaker, he has apologised because he is unable to be here...

Member
Gerald Howarth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2010
Reference
506 c708-9
House
House of Commons

In large part, we have had a good and constructive debate, and despite the political hyperbole, there is a greater consensus on defence than is sometimes apparent. I wish to start, as did the Secretary of State, by paying tribute to our brave servicemen who have lost their lives in...

Member
Bill Rammell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2010
Reference
506 c712
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman will know that we are going to have a defence review, and I will talk about that in a moment. Above all, as my hon. Friend the Member for Woodspring said, the Government failed, in the years of plenty, to fund their own SDR fully, creating a...

Member
Gerald Howarth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2010
Reference
506 c711-2
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman and I have talked about these issues outside the House for many years, and we did so a few weeks ago. As he knows, the audience, comprising industrialists in the defence industry from Britain and Europe, made it clear that they did not believe that the Conservatives...

Member
Doug Henderson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2010
Reference
506 c710
House
House of Commons

I will not at the moment, but I will try to do so later, time permitting. Manpower shortages across all three services amount to 2,500. Vital defence research expenditure has been cut by 23 per cent. in the past three years. Future equipment depends on today's investment, and that investment...

Member
Gerald Howarth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2010
Reference
506 c710
House
House of Commons

Will the hon. Gentleman give way?

Member
Doug Henderson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2010
Reference
506 c710
House
House of Commons

I am afraid I will not give way to the Under-Secretary: he has not been here for the whole debate. This debate is about the Government's record on defence, but some say that we are making a mistake in raising that aspect, and I must begin on a positive note....

Member
Gerald Howarth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2010
Reference
506 c709-10
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,"That this House expresses its continued support for HM armed forces personnel and their families; notes that over 440 service personnel have been killed on operations in Iraq and Afghanistan since 2001; further notes that the armed forces have operated over the original planning assumptions for years;...

Member
Liam Fox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2010
Reference
506 c663-4
House
House of Commons

Will the hon. Gentleman give way?

Member
Ian Davidson (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2010
Reference
506 c664
House
House of Commons

That is a statement of the obvious. I will come in a moment to the economic backdrop against which future decisions will have to be made. The point that I am making is that we now know that troops were sent into harm's way in Iraq, without the proper equipment,...

Member
Liam Fox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2010
Reference
506 c665
House
House of Commons

May I go back to the point that the hon. Gentleman was making when I sought to intervene on him? He was speaking movingly about the shortfalls affecting the Navy. Is it true that the first act of a Conservative Government would be, as he said to the convenors of...

Member
Ian Davidson (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2010
Reference
506 c665
House
House of Commons