Skip to main content

1-20 of 145 results for subject:Redundancy

Session X
2008-09
Subject X
Redundancy pay

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Redundancy pay (145)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government whether the proposed changes to the Civil Service Compensation Scheme will have implications for compensation schemes in (a) local government and (b) non-departmental public bodies overseen by his Department.

Asked by
Caroline Spelman (Conservative)
Answering body
Communities and Local Government
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 October 2009
Reference
497 c1108W; 292664
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government which local authorities have made their chief executive redundant as a result of local government reorganisation in the last five years; what severance pay was awarded in each case; and which of them have subsequently taken up employment in...

Asked by
Margaret Moran (Labour)
Answering body
Communities and Local Government
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
12 October 2009
Reference
497 c333W; 291727
House
House of Commons

This Government want to do all they can to help hard-working people who have been affected by the current recession. Although levels of redundancies have not reached those seen in the recession of the early 1980s and 1990s, the devastation caused to communities by that experience, when whole industries were...

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2009
Reference
712 c155-7GC
House
House of Lords

That the Grand Committee do report to the House that it has considered the Work and Families (Increase of the Maximum Amount) Order 2009. Relevant document: 16th Report from the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments.

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2009
Reference
712 c155GC
House
House of Lords

From these Benches, I welcome this order. The two fundamental points that the Minister made are absolutely germane in the current situation. First, it is extremely important that with the uprating there should be an acceleration of the payments being made to those worst hit by what is happening in...

Member
Lord Razzall (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2009
Reference
712 c157-8GC
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for introducing the order. We on these Benches are acutely aware of the effect that redundancy can have on people, and we have great sympathy with anyone made redundant. This order increases the weekly limit for a second time in six months; it has gone up...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2009
Reference
712 c157GC
House
House of Lords

Draft Work and Families (Increase of the Maximum Amount) Order 2009. Lords debate on a motion to consider. Agreed to on question. Grand Committee held in the Moses Room. [Relevant document: 16th report from the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments]

Lead member
Lord Young of Norwood Green
Answering member
Lord De Mauley
Department
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
6 July 2009
Reference
712 c155-8GC
House
House of Lords

We believe that we have a good case for increasing the limit to help employees made redundant, particularly during the current recession. It is absolutely right for the Government to take action to prevent the collapse of the banks and to support business through the recession. It is right for...

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2009
Reference
712 c158GC
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty's Government what financial support is available, and for how long, to Territorial Army soldiers whose posts are removed.

Asked by
Lord Astor of Hever (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 June 2009
Reference
4088; 711 c293-4WA
House
House of Lords

I beg to move,"That, for the purposes of any Act resulting from the Statutory Redundancy Pay (Amendment) Bill, it is expedient to authorise the payment out of money provided by Parliament of any increase attributable to the Act in the sums payable under any other Act out of money provided...

Member
Ian Lucas (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 June 2009
Reference
494 c272
House
House of Commons

Did not the Minister say earlier this afternoon in Committee that the average is now closer to £470?

Member
Jonathan Djanogly (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 June 2009
Reference
494 c272
House
House of Commons

The Liberal Democrats consider this to be a not inappropriate increase in the maximum amount that a person could be allowed to claim in statutory redundancy pay. We understand that the future of the Bill is still in the balance. We shall wait to see what happens, but on the...

Member
Baroness Burt of Solihull (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 June 2009
Reference
494 c274
House
House of Commons

I have had an opportunity to check my notes from earlier today, and the correct figure is indeed £470. I am grateful to the hon. Member for Huntingdon (Mr. Djanogly) for pointing that out, and I apologise to him and the House for inadvertently giving an incorrect figure. I am...

Member
Ian Lucas (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 June 2009
Reference
494 c274
House
House of Commons

I do not believe so, but I will happily check the record and get back to the hon. Gentleman on the matter; I am grateful to him for highlighting it. We estimate the cost to the Exchequer as somewhere between £44 million and £86 million a year, so the Bill...

Member
Ian Lucas (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 June 2009
Reference
494 c272
House
House of Commons

Let me make it plain that the reason why we oppose the Second Reading of this union-sponsored Bill, and the Government's haphazard attempt this afternoon to find a compromise, is that all those proposals, and the money resolution, will reduce access to employment opportunities at a time when the Government...

Member
Jonathan Djanogly (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 June 2009
Reference
494 c272-4
House
House of Commons

Why not?

Member
Jonathan Djanogly (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 June 2009
Reference
494 c274
House
House of Commons

Because I am in the middle of a speech, and I choose not to give way. I think that we—[Interruption.] Yes indeed, and we had a very good debate earlier today. We had an accurate exposition of the Conservatives' policy, and of their disregard for individuals who are made redundant....

Member
Ian Lucas (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 June 2009
Reference
494 c274
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister give way?

Member
Jonathan Djanogly (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 June 2009
Reference
494 c274
House
House of Commons

No.

Member
Ian Lucas (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 June 2009
Reference
494 c274
House
House of Commons

I shall give way to the hon. Gentleman now.

Member
Ian Lucas (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 June 2009
Reference
494 c274
House
House of Commons