Skip to main content

1-20 of 82 results for subject:Uprating

Session X
2006-07
Subject X
Manual workers

Type

House

Session

2006-07 (82)

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Manual workers (82)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I was very pleased to learn that the Government had accepted in principle at least that the basic state pension should be linked to the wages index, as I think we all were. It will be recalled that Lady Castle, with my support, repeatedly sought to persuade the Government of...

Member
Baroness Turner of Camden (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 June 2007
Reference
692 c972-3
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 21: 21: Clause 5, page 7, line 1, leave out from ““means”” to end of line 8 and insert ““the tax year 2007–2008”” The noble Lord said: Amendment No. 21 is in my name and that of my noble friend Lord Kirkwood. I shall also speak to...

Member
Lord Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 June 2007
Reference
692 c972
House
House of Lords

I have an amendment in this group. Perhaps I may ask, like St Thomas Aquinas, ““When, dear Lord, when?””. That is exactly the point behind—

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 June 2007
Reference
692 c973
House
House of Lords

I add my support to the amendment. I do not think that 15,000 women and 5,000 men is a big number to handle in the totality of the complex administration that we run at the moment, so any suggestion that there is a technical block to doing this is nonsense....

Member
Lord Kirkwood of Kirkhope (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 June 2007
Reference
692 c990
House
House of Lords

It is a wonderful idea, but just how is it going to be achieved? Who will do the aggregation? Who will be responsible for paying? People in the situation which the noble Baroness described have the opportunity to pay voluntary,class 3 NICs, which may well be suitable for them,but even...

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 June 2007
Reference
692 c988-9
House
House of Lords

I support the amendment. There is a problem. The Government have recognised that at least 15,000 women, on their calculations, will remain outside the contributory system because their hours of work are fragmented between different jobs. They might at one time run together several part-time jobs—in a newsagent, a pub...

Member
Baroness Hollis of Heigham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 June 2007
Reference
692 c989-90
House
House of Lords

I thank my noble friend for that sympathetic response. There was an acceptance of the view that people working on physically exhausting, sometimes dangerous, work should not be expected to continue to work to a late age without some relief or provision made for them. There is a general acceptance...

Member
Baroness Turner of Camden (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 June 2007
Reference
692 c987
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 31: 31: After Clause 13, insert the following new Clause— ““Lower earnings limit Lower earnings limit (1) Section 5 of the SSCBA (earnings limits) is amended as follows. (2) After subsection (2) insert— ““(2A) A person’s gross earnings from all sources shall be aggregated when determining whether...

Member
Baroness Thomas of Winchester (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 June 2007
Reference
692 c987-8
House
House of Lords

I do not know, but I can check. This is an extremely serious matter, which we do not take lightly. It is vital that the Government offer a role model for employers. The debate that my noble friends Lady Turner and Lady Dean have precipitated draws attention to the wider...

Member
Baroness Morgan of Drefelin (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 June 2007
Reference
692 c987
House
House of Lords

I am sorry to intervene, but the point that I was trying to make was about government example. The latest figures appear to show that in April 2005, of the people employed in the Civil Service—in government departments and agencies—only 585 were aged 65 or over. That is about 0.1...

Member
Lord Fowler (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 June 2007
Reference
692 c986
House
House of Lords

I thank my noble friends Lady Turner and Lady Dean for precipitating the debate. They have set us a challenge. The issues that have come out during the passage of the Bill are extremely important Your Lordships’ House is hugely symbolic of the value of older people and the contribution...

Member
Baroness Morgan of Drefelin (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 June 2007
Reference
692 c984-6
House
House of Lords

I do not have the most up-to-date figures, but I assert that the Government intend to improve the number of older people in employment. The noble Lord asked about the department’s position on public appointments. The DWP has abolished its bar on those over 65 taking public appointments.

Member
Baroness Morgan of Drefelin (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 June 2007
Reference
692 c986
House
House of Lords

Do not let that stop you.

Member
Baroness Hollis of Heigham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 June 2007
Reference
692 c982
House
House of Lords

It will not stop me, as the noble Baroness says. My noble friend is correct. One can relate Amendment No. 34 to the amendment proposed by the noble Baroness. For very much the same reasons that the noble Lord, Lord Oakeshott, has put forward, I do not support it because...

Member
Lord Fowler (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 June 2007
Reference
692 c982-3
House
House of Lords

I agree with much of what has been said by the noble Lord, Lord Fowler. For those who may not have studied his work, Professor Sir Michael Marmot has done a huge amount of work on the socio-economic determinants of health and longevity. It is the case that huge differences...

Member
Baroness Greengross (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 June 2007
Reference
692 c983
House
House of Lords

I am sure we will return to this issue when we reach my amendment on annuities. Having said that, this amendment raises some interesting questions. As we have heard, those lucky enough to be born into the higher socio-economic groups or to have been to university enjoy measurable advantages, but...

Member
Baroness Howe of Idlicote (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 June 2007
Reference
692 c983-4
House
House of Lords

I am deeply disappointed because I was going to compliment my noble friend Lord Skelmersdale on the wisdom of and his skill in putting down Amendment No. 34, and he tells me that he is not going to move it.

Member
Lord Fowler (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 June 2007
Reference
692 c982
House
House of Lords

I accept that point, but unless one is clear about the rules for residency that one is going to apply, how can one know what data one is going to collect? That is why one needs to understand the system that one is suggesting could be introduced. Until one does...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 June 2007
Reference
692 c1003
House
House of Lords

The first half of the Minister’s speech was actually arguing against a different amendment from the one that I moved. It was as though I was suggesting that we establish a universal basic state pension. I happen to support that, but that is not what the amendment says. Indeed, I...

Member
Baroness Hollis of Heigham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 June 2007
Reference
692 c1002
House
House of Lords

moved AmendmentNo. 36: 36: Schedule 1, page 31, leave out lines 29 to 32 and insert— ““(a) in paragraph 5 (Category A or B retirement pension) for the figure in column (3) (increase for adult dependant) substitute ““—””; (b) in paragraph 6 (Category C retirement pension) for the figure in...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 June 2007
Reference
692 c1003-4
House
House of Lords