Skip to main content

1-20 of 357 results for subject:Defence

Session X
2006-07
Subject X
NATO

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
NATO (357)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Where is the barracks?

Member
Lord Beamish (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2007
Reference
464 c792
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the Secretary of State for his intervention, but it does not move us much further forward. I seriously suggest that he listen to the British Armed Forces Federation and the Royal British Legion, and look at their websites. He should listen to them, not to me....

Member
Andrew Murrison (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2007
Reference
464 c791-2
House
House of Commons

I suspect that the hon. Gentleman has not been listening to the debate. The issue of the false comparison, which he has parroted again, has already been dealt with. It is clear from the way in which he is winding up the debate that he is reading a speech that...

Member
Lord Browne of Ladyton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2007
Reference
464 c791
House
House of Commons

If the hon. Gentleman is prepared to defend the hon. Member for Woodspring, I shall give way—and I hope that he can do so.

Member
Bob Ainsworth (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2007
Reference
464 c798
House
House of Commons

The Minister has accused the Conservatives of using the armed forces as a political football. That is a disgraceful allegation. What does he make of his own Prime Minister’s recent efforts—grandstanding in Iraq?

Member
Andrew Murrison (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2007
Reference
464 c798
House
House of Commons

I wish that the hon. Lady would do her research, and that she understood what she was talking about when making statements such as the one that she just made. I have pressed the Defence Committee hard on the subject that she raises; I am the one who has been...

Member
Lord Beamish (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2007
Reference
464 c743
House
House of Commons

Rubbish.

Member
Lord Beamish (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2007
Reference
464 c743
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman says ““rubbish””, but I think that the point was even admitted at the Dispatch Box in debate last week. In the meantime, there is a great hole; we have insufficient numbers of the right vehicles.

Member
Ann Winterton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2007
Reference
464 c743
House
House of Commons

I am coming to an NAO report now. MOD officials appeared before the Public Accounts Committee on 28 January 1998 and they were asked whether spending constraints under the previous Government had prevented improvements to housing stock. They said yes. Who asked the question? It was none other than the...

Member
Lord Touhig (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2007
Reference
464 c741-2
House
House of Commons

I will try to rise above the rather carping nature of the debate. I hope that hon. Members will recognise that my motivation is concern for the welfare of our armed services and concern to provide them with the right equipment to do the job to which the nation has...

Member
Ann Winterton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2007
Reference
464 c742-3
House
House of Commons

The public will judge the Conservatives’ reaction on that day; I have no doubt that a harsh judgment will be made on that party. The conflict in Iraq and Afghanistan has meant that we are asking servicemen and women to do more than ever before, placing greater demands on them...

Member
Lord Touhig (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2007
Reference
464 c739-41
House
House of Commons

What happened to the repair and maintenance budget in the last financial year? If the right hon. Gentleman does not know, perhaps he might like to check the National Audit Office report on the subject.

Member
Andrew Murrison (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2007
Reference
464 c741
House
House of Commons

I welcome the announcement that my right hon. Friend the Prime Minister made on 8 October on Iraq, which will see troop numbers reduced to about 2,500 by next spring. The decision was made possible only as a result of the fantastic efforts of British troops who have helped to...

Member
Lord Touhig (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2007
Reference
464 c739
House
House of Commons

I was saddened by what the right hon. Gentleman had to say, for the simple reason that I do not think the British public like our services being manipulated for party political reasons. Announcements were made in Iraq about which even the Secretary of State for Defence did not know,...

Member
Ann Winterton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2007
Reference
464 c739
House
House of Commons

I agree with the hon. Gentleman’s comments, and with the point that the Committee made. That issue is crucial to the long-term success of our operations in Afghanistan. The key point is that we must retain our commitment. We went into Afghanistan because we had no alternative: it had provided...

Member
Nick Harvey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2007
Reference
464 c738-9
House
House of Commons

No, I shall press on. In Afghanistan, we are involved in a task for the long term and it is incumbent on all of us to explain it, even though that is not easy or straightforward to do. We have to accept that in Afghanistan tribal issues, insurgency issues and...

Member
Nick Harvey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2007
Reference
464 c735-7
House
House of Commons

Does the hon. Gentleman agree that we are always the ones taking on the fight, and that only a few countries are willing to take on the hard role in Afghanistan? Does he agree that some of our NATO colleagues should take some of the weight that we have carried...

Member
Lindsay Hoyle (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2007
Reference
464 c737
House
House of Commons

I agree; the hon. Gentleman’s point is well made and I referred to the same thing earlier. The hon. Member for Woodspring (Dr. Fox) said that membership of NATO means taking on the full commitment entailed by combined security and joint defence. These operations cannot be treated in an à-la-carte...

Member
Nick Harvey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2007
Reference
464 c737-8
House
House of Commons

As a member of the Defence Committee, may I suggest that we should be looking at the long-term position? That is the point we made in our report: the investment should be put in for that long-term crop, as opposed to the short-term dividend. We must address that issue.

Member
David Hamilton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2007
Reference
464 c738
House
House of Commons

Will the hon. Gentleman explain whether he supports the view expressed by the right hon. and learned Member for North-East Fife (Sir Menzies Campbell), who until very recently was the leader of the Liberal Democrats? He said that he believed that our debt to Iraq had been discharged, and that...

Member
Julian Brazier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2007
Reference
464 c734
House
House of Commons