Skip to main content

1-20 of 163 results for subject:Misuse

Session X
2005-06
Subject X
Medical treatments

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Medical treatments (163)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
House of Commons papers
Notes
SPS current year only;Research Sc in annual run
Date
19 July 2006
Reference
HC 1258 2005-06
House
House of Commons
Will my hon. Friend liaise with health Ministers with a view to offering all heroin addicts in treatment voluntary screening for blood-borne diseases, especially hepatitis C?
Asked by
Brian Iddon (Labour)
Answering body
Home Office
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
17 July 2006
Reference
449 c5
House
House of Commons

moved Amendments Nos. 21 to 23:"Page 4, line 7, leave out from ““to”” to end of line 8 and insert ““a relevant local court””""Page 4, line 11, leave out ““period for which it has effect”” and insert ““specified period””""Page 4, line 15, leave out from first ““the”” to ““; or”” in line 16 and insert ““specified period””" On Question, amendments agreed...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2006
Reference
681 c193
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 25:"Page 5, line 39, leave out subsection (2)." On Question, amendment agreed to. [Amendment No. 26 not moved.]

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2006
Reference
681 c193
House
House of Lords

moved Amendments Nos. 27 to 29:"Page 6, line 11, leave out from ““to”” to end of line 12 and insert ““a relevant local court””""Page 6, line 13, leave out ““period for which it has effect”” and insert ““specified period””""Page 6, line 18, leave out from first ““the”” to ““; or”” in line 19 and insert ““specified period””" On Question, amendments...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2006
Reference
681 c193-4
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 30:"Page 7, line 2, at end insert—" ““( ) Where the court makes an order under this section pursuant to an application without notice, the individual who is subject to that order is to be served with a copy of the order personally by an officer of that court.””...

Member
Viscount Bridgeman (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2006
Reference
681 c194
House
House of Lords

: I have indicated that I oppose Clause 8. At this stage, I should like to hear the reasons for requiring an interim order. Such orders are to last only for a limited period unless renewed. Renewal is another problem, as it looks as if they can be renewed without much difficulty. Why should...

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2006
Reference
681 c194-5
House
House of Lords

The court can, of course, make an interim drinking banning order if it thinks it necessary to take immediate action to stop the problems that are being caused by the criminal or disorderly conduct of an individual while under the influence of alcohol before the application for a drinking banning...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2006
Reference
681 c195
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the Minister. I shall need to look carefully at his reply in the context of the procedures and of his honourable friend’s remarks in another place. In the meantime, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.

Member
Viscount Bridgeman (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2006
Reference
681 c195
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 31:"Page 7, line 3, leave out subsection (4) and insert—" ““(4)   Permission of the court is required for the making or hearing of an application in accordance with subsection (3).”” The noble Viscount said: This amendment ensures that it is the court and not the justices’ clerk that has to...

Member
Viscount Bridgeman (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2006
Reference
681 c195-6
House
House of Lords

I entirely support Amendment No. 31. It concerns the same problem with the interim orders to which I have already referred and I shall not repeat myself.

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2006
Reference
681 c196
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord, Lord Thomas of Gresford, concentrated his remarks on the adverse effects, as he saw them, of naming and shaming someone between 16 and 18, but his amendment, probing though it may be, seeks to ensure that no drinking banning order may be made on those below 18. Yet it seems, perhaps to...

Member
Lord Borrie (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2006
Reference
681 c185-6
House
House of Lords

I do not think that the Bill is about naming and shaming. We should look for some consistency of approach in its purpose of protecting other persons from criminal or disorderly conduct while the subject is under the influence of alcohol. Those of us who have some experience of living in...

Member
Lord Brooke of Alverthorpe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2006
Reference
681 c186
House
House of Lords

I will speak in support of Amendment No. 15 on the basis that I take it as a probing amendment to explore the Government’s rationale for setting the age limit at which a court may make a drinking banning order at 16. It asks the Government to justify why it should be 16. The amendment of...

Member
Baroness Anelay of St Johns (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2006
Reference
681 c184-5
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 17:"Page 2, line 37, leave out ““relevant”” and insert ““other””" The noble Lord said: Government Amendments Nos. 17, 25, 52, 54 and 60 make some minor and technical amendments to the provisions on drinking banning orders by removing the concept of relevant persons. The concept of relevant persons refers to those people in a relevant authority’s area...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2006
Reference
681 c189-90
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 18:"Page 2, line 45, at end insert—" ““(6)   Nothing in this section affects the operation of section 127 of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980 (c. 43) (limitation of time in respect of informations laid or complaints made in magistrates’ court).”” The noble Lord said: Government Amendments Nos. 18 and 165 to the drinking banning order provisions and the new clause amending...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2006
Reference
681 c190
House
House of Lords

These amendments have given rise to a useful short debate on the two issues to which they relate: the age level at which drinking banning orders should kick in, and the issue of publicity for those affected by them. I am grateful to noble Lords who contributed to the debate. I have...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2006
Reference
681 c186-8
House
House of Lords

Across the whole breadth of the criminal law, it is a matter of public policy which is agreed to by all parties and in accordance with the covenant on the Rights of the Child, to which this country is a signatory, that we have thought it right to protect young...

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2006
Reference
681 c188-9
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the Minister because I appreciate that he is trying to take the matter forward. I agree with him that this could be a useful provision. I am certainly not trying to prevent a useful provision being in this part of the Bill. I remain concerned that subsection (3) gives a wider...

Member
Baroness Anelay of St Johns (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2006
Reference
681 c192-3
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 19:"Page 3, line 10, leave out subsection (3)." The noble Baroness said: The intention is to probe the effect of subsection (3) of Clause 3. Clause 3 enables relevant authorities to apply to the county court for a drinking banning order against an individual in certain circumstances. Those relevant authorities are the chief...

Member
Baroness Anelay of St Johns (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2006
Reference
681 c190-1
House
House of Lords