1-19 of 19 results for subject:Reviews
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.237 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.007 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Reviews
- We searched for
- subject_t:Reviews OR subject_ses:12492
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
Health and Social Care (Community Health and Standards) Bill. Lords report stage second day.
Health and Social Care (Community Health and Standards) Bill. Lords report stage second day.
Health and Social Care (Community Health and Standards) Bill. Lords report stage first day.
Health and Social Care (Community Health and Standards) Bill. Lords report stage first day.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what proposals he has to increase the number of dentists training in (a) the North West, (b) East Lancashire and (c) England. - Includes details of review of the dental workforce.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what proposals he has to increase the number of dentists training in (a) the North West, (b) East Lancashire and (c) England. - Includes details of review of the dental workforce.
Health and Social Care (Community Health and Standards) Bill. Lords Committee stage fifth day. Clauses 49-170 agreed to, clauses 59, 61, 62, 67, 73, 83, 84, 89, 99, 112 and 114 as amended agreed to. Schedules 9 and 10 agreed to, schedule 9 as amended. New clauses considered. Clause 171 under consideration.
Health and Social Care (Community Health and Standards) Bill. Lords Committee stage fifth day. Clauses 49-170 agreed to, clauses 59, 61, 62, 67, 73, 83, 84, 89, 99, 112 and 114 as amended agreed to. Schedules 9 and 10 agreed to, schedule 9 as amended. New clauses considered. Clause 171...
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what reviews he has commissioned into NHS walk in centres and their impact on demand on other health services; and if he will place copies of the reviews in the Library.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what reviews he has commissioned into NHS walk in centres and their impact on demand on other health services; and if he will place copies of the reviews in the Library.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, pursuant to his Answer of 7th July 2003, 408 c657W, what the terms of reference are of the independent review; and when it will report. - (Holding answer 11 July 2003).
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, pursuant to his Answer of 7th July 2003, 408 c657W, what the terms of reference are of the independent review; and when it will report. - (Holding answer 11 July 2003).
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, if he will publish the results of the Dental Workforce Review.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, if he will publish the results of the Dental Workforce Review.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, if he will make a statement on the progress of the Dental Workforce Review.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, if he will make a statement on the progress of the Dental Workforce Review.
Health and Social Care (Community Health and Standards) Bill. Committee stage sixteenth sitting (afternoon). Clauses 51 to 65 agreed to, clauses 51 to 54, 56, 57, 60 and 63 as amended. Clauses 72 to 88 agreed to, clauses 72, 75 to 79, 81 to 83 and 86 as amended. Clauses 99 to 105 agreed to, clauses 99, 103 and 105 as amended. Clauses 107 to 109 and 111 agreed to. Clauses 113 to 128 agreed to, clauses 116, 117, 127 and 128 as amended. Clauses 133 and 134 agreed to. Schedule 8 as amended agreed to. Clauses 135 and 136 as amended agreed to.
Health and Social Care (Community Health and Standards) Bill. Committee stage sixteenth sitting (afternoon). Clauses 51 to 65 agreed to, clauses 51 to 54, 56, 57, 60 and 63 as amended. Clauses 72 to 88 agreed to, clauses 72, 75 to 79, 81 to 83 and 86 as amended. Clauses...
Health and Social Care (Community Health and Standards) Bill. Committee stage fifteenth sitting (morning). Clauses 44 and 45 agreed to, clause 45 as amended. Clauses 46 to 48 disagreed to. Clauses 49 and 50 as amended agreed to. Clause 51 as amended under consideration.
Health and Social Care (Community Health and Standards) Bill. Committee stage fifteenth sitting (morning). Clauses 44 and 45 agreed to, clause 45 as amended. Clauses 46 to 48 disagreed to. Clauses 49 and 50 as amended agreed to. Clause 51 as amended under consideration.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, if he will place in the Library the full results of the Gateway Review process into (a) proposed upgrades of the NHSnet, (b) reprocurement of the NHSnet, (c) a national scheme for electronic bookings, (d) replacement of the Nation-wide Clearing Service (NWCS)...
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, if he will place in the Library the full results of the Gateway Review process into (a) proposed upgrades of the NHSnet, (b) reprocurement of the NHSnet, (c) a national scheme for electronic bookings, (d) replacement of the Nation-wide Clearing Service (NWCS)...
That this House notes that, in the early part of 2002, the Government announced proposals that healthcare services in 35 highly specialised areas (including specialist neuroscience, women's health, rheumatology, HIV, haemophilia, renal and cancer services) would be commissioned by primary care trust-led consortia with effect from 2003; believes that this one size fits all approach to commissioning is not appropriate to all the diseases and conditions listed in the National Specialised Services Definitions Set; is concerned that not all primary care trusts have the necessary experience, personnel, skills, funds and infrastructure to plan and commission specialised services effectively; is further concerned that specialised service provision and standards of patient care will suffer as a result; welcomes the formation of the Specialised Healthcare Alliance, a coalition of patient representative groups, advocacy organisations and healthcare professionals, to bring these concerns to the attention of parliamentarians, government and others; and calls upon the Government to publish the results of its review and to announce its intentions with regard to the funding and commissioning of specialised healthcare services as a matter of urgency.
That this House notes that, in the early part of 2002, the Government announced proposals that healthcare services in 35 highly specialised areas (including specialist neuroscience, women's health, rheumatology, HIV, haemophilia, renal and cancer services) would be commissioned by primary care trust-led consortia with effect from 2003; believes that this...
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, how many members of the Commission for Health Improvement attended the scrutiny sessions of the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital in 2002; and what was the cost of the visit; how many members of the Commission for Health Improvement attended the scrutiny...
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, how many members of the Commission for Health Improvement attended the scrutiny sessions of the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital in 2002; and what was the cost of the visit; how many members of the Commission for Health Improvement attended the scrutiny...
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what medical (a) qualifications and (b) background are required in those engaged in clinical governance reviews carried out by the Commission for Health Improvement. - Inc figures.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what medical (a) qualifications and (b) background are required in those engaged in clinical governance reviews carried out by the Commission for Health Improvement. - Inc figures.
What has been achieved as a result of the strategic review of pathology conducted by the Department of Health in 1995. [HL 571]. - Inc figures.
What has been achieved as a result of the strategic review of pathology conducted by the Department of Health in 1995. [HL 571]. - Inc figures.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what the process and timetable is for completion of the review into commissioning specialised services; how the views of patients will be taken into account, and when he will announce the outcome.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what the process and timetable is for completion of the review into commissioning specialised services; how the views of patients will be taken into account, and when he will announce the outcome.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, how many responses his Department received as part of its review of commissioning arrangements for specialised services from (a) regional specialised commissioning groups, (b) local service providers, (c) commissioners, (d) patients' representatives and (e) carers' representatives; and how many responses were submitted...
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, how many responses his Department received as part of its review of commissioning arrangements for specialised services from (a) regional specialised commissioning groups, (b) local service providers, (c) commissioners, (d) patients' representatives and (e) carers' representatives; and how many responses were submitted...
To ask the Secretary for State for Health what directions his Department gave to the regional specialist commissioning groups in requiring them to seek the views of their local providers, commissioners and patients' and carers' representatives.
To ask the Secretary for State for Health what directions his Department gave to the regional specialist commissioning groups in requiring them to seek the views of their local providers, commissioners and patients' and carers' representatives.
That this House is deeply concerned at the unreasonably wide regional variations in the availability of NHS chiropody services, in that twice as many cases are being taken on in some NHS regions, such as the North West and South West, as in the South East and Eastern regions; notes that the Government is fully aware of the situation but has failed to act; and calls on the Secretary of State for Health to publish the report of his review, known as Feet First II, and to make a statement on how he intends to respond to these concerns.
That this House is deeply concerned at the unreasonably wide regional variations in the availability of NHS chiropody services, in that twice as many cases are being taken on in some NHS regions, such as the North West and South West, as in the South East and Eastern regions; notes...