Skip to main content

1-3 of 3 results for answeredby:"Adam Ingram"

Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Debate on a motion for the adjournment on science policy and human genetics. (Includes ref to HC 41 1994/95, Cm 3061, HC 49, 303, 249 and 643 1995/96, Cm 3306 and Cm 3257).

Lead member
Ian Taylor
Answering member
Adam Ingram
Department
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
19 July 1996
Reference
281 c1409-82;281 c1405-78
House
House of Commons

Chemical Weapons Bill. Committee stage. Clauses 1 to 38 agreed to, clauses 32 and 35 as amended. New clauses considered. Schedule agreed to. Bill reported with amendments. Report stage (formal). Third reading debate. Agreed to on question. Passed.

Lead member
Phillip Oppenheim
Answering member
Adam Ingram
Department
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Debates on bills; Committee of the Whole House (HC)
Date
6 December 1995
Reference
268 c413-43
House
House of Commons

Chemical Weapons Bill. Queens consent signified. Second reading debate. Agreed to on question. Committed to a Committee of the Whole House. Money resolution (formal).

Lead member
Phillip Oppenheim
Answering member
Adam Ingram
Department
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Debates on bills
Date
23 November 1995
Reference
267 c810-48
House
House of Commons