Skip to main content

1-20 of 31 results for subject:Defence

Session X
1993-94
Subject X
NATO

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
NATO (31)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Debate (first day) on a motion to approve the Statement on the Defence Estimates (Cm 2550). (Includes ref to HC 68, HC 118, HC 511, HC 297 and HC 22, 1993/94).

Lead member
Malcolm Rifkind
Answering member
Lord Clark of Windermere
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Oral statements
Date
17 October 1994
Reference
248 c36-116;248 c36-117
House
House of Commons

If he will give the latest figures available for defence spending as a percentage of gross domestic product for each the members of the NATO alliance and the same figures for the year 1985.

Asked by
David Nicholson (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 July 1994
Reference
247 c381-2W;247 c382-3W
House
House of Commons

Debate on motion for adjournment on Army.

Lead member
Jeremy Hanley
Answering member
Lord Reid of Cardowan
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Parliamentary proceedings
Date
4 May 1994
Reference
242 c725-818;242 c723-816
House
House of Commons
1st supplementary on same.
Asked by
Lord Mandelson (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
12 April 1994
Reference
241 c12-3
House
House of Commons
If he will make proposals for greater burden sharing of military expenditure among European members of NATO and the Western European Union.
Asked by
Lord Mandelson (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
12 April 1994
Reference
241 c12-3
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Malcolm Rifkind (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
12 April 1994
Reference
241 c12-3
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Malcolm Rifkind (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
12 April 1994
Reference
241 c12-3
House
House of Commons

What are the defence efforts referred to by Viscount Cranborne in his answer of 9 February 1994, 551 c127, in relation to the United States new counter-proliferation initiative; who is making these efforts; what new weapons systems are envisaged; at what, and at whose, expense would they be obtained; how...

Asked by
Lord Kennet (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 February 1994
Reference
552 c69-70WA
House
House of Lords

Debate on a motion for the adjournment on Royal Navy.

Lead member
Jeremy Hanley
Answering member
Lord Anderson of Swansea
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
17 February 1994
Reference
237 c1081-159;237 c1081-160
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Baroness Chalker of Wallasey (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 February 1994
Reference
552 c203-4
House
House of Lords
Answered by
Baroness Chalker of Wallasey (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 February 1994
Reference
552 c203-4
House
House of Lords
What is the annual defence expenditure of NATO countries & what funds are allocated by those countries each year as aid to the economies of the former Warsaw Pact countries.
Asked by
Bishop of Worcester (Bishops (affiliation))
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
16 February 1994
Reference
552 c203-4
House
House of Lords
1st supplementary on poverty & nationalism in Russia - includes figures.
Asked by
Bishop of Worcester (Bishops (affiliation))
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
16 February 1994
Reference
552 c203-4
House
House of Lords

If he will comment on the benefits to the United Kingdom of continued membership of (a) NATO, (b) the Western European Union and (c) politico-military co-operation within the European Union; and what is the annual cost of United Kingdom participation in each defence organisation. - Inc fact that will write.

Asked by
Llew Smith (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 January 1994
Reference
235 c815W;235 c813W
House
House of Commons

What is the proposed formula for financial contributions to the NATO organisation by countries acting in partnership.

Asked by
Robert Banks (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 January 1994
Reference
235 c818W;235 c816W
House
House of Commons

What communications he has had with his NATO counterparts relating to his Defence Costs Study.

Asked by
Lord Clark of Windermere (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
14 January 1994
Reference
235 c343W
House
House of Commons

That this House welcomes the Brussels Declaration of the North Atlantic Council of 11th January as a turning-point in the developing of a European foreign, defence and security identity 'as the expression of a mature Europe'; agrees with the Council that the Western European Union should be developed as the...

Primary sponsor
Calum Macdonald (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
12 January 1994
Reference
335; 335A1
House
House of Commons

What are HMGs reasons for preferring a Europe-wide security system based on an expansion of NATO as preferred by the United States to one based on the CSCE, as preferred by other states.

Asked by
Lord Kennet (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
13 December 1993
Reference
550 c89WA
House
House of Lords

What importance HMG attach to the statement made on 25th November by Mr Primakov, Head of the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service, that Russia is "not indifferent to the fact that NATO plans to reach right up to our border" and that if this happens it "would necessitate countermeasures on the...

Asked by
Lord Kennet (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
13 December 1993
Reference
550 c89-90WA
House
House of Lords

What is HMGs opinion of the new Russian "military doctrine", official Russian comment on which advises ex-Warsaw Pact states & ex-Soviet states to refrain from joining or closely associating with a nuclear-armed alliance - i.e. NATO - on pain of becoming targets for Russian nuclear weapons.

Asked by
Lord Kennet (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 December 1993
Reference
550 c75WA
House
House of Lords