Skip to main content

1-20 of 450 results for subject:USA

Publisher X
House of Lords
Subject X
Intelligence services

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Intelligence services (450)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
Select Committee reports; House of Lords papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
International Relations and Defence Committee
Date
16 April 2026
Reference
HL 290 2024-26
House
House of Lords

There are long-standing intelligence and law enforcement frameworks between the UK and its Five Eyes partners: the US, Australia, New Zealand and Canada. Those frameworks continue. It is the long-standing policy of successive Governments to not comment on the detail of intelligence matters, but for the benefit of the House, I can say that the Foreign Secretary and the US Secretary of State have both dismissed recent reports.

Answered by
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
11 December 2025
Reference
851 c335
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to my noble friend the Minister for that response. There is one issue in particular which is of major concern to people: the American bombing campaign on small boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific. I am told that 76 people have died in these attacks on civilian ships. There have been 19 attacks, most of which people believe are criminal activities on the high seas. There are often quite a lot of UK personnel on American ships, and they could be implicated in criminal charges. Has my noble friend considered removing UK military personnel from these ships until things calm down?

Asked by
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
11 December 2025
Reference
851 c335
House
House of Lords

With regard to the strikes that have recently taken place, the United Kingdom was not involved. We are committed to fighting the scourge of drugs and organised crime with our partners in Latin America in accordance with legal obligations. I repeat that the UK was not involved.

Answered by
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
11 December 2025
Reference
851 c335
House
House of Lords

My Lords, intelligence sharing is obviously essential to our national security, but if an ally leaks or withholds information or uses it for illegal actions, does that not require the UK to look more widely for autonomous intelligence gathering of our own, less dependence on others and more co-operation with other trusted partners?

Asked by
Lord Bruce of Bennachie (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
11 December 2025
Reference
851 c335
House
House of Lords

It is important that the UK independently gathers intelligence. The Five Eyes partners of the UK—Australia, Canada and New Zealand—are critical intelligence-gathering partners. The UK is better and more secure because of that arrangement.

Answered by
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
11 December 2025
Reference
851 c335
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I welcome the reassurance on the Five Eyes partnership, and I commend the Minister on his versatility and adaptability in taking on such a wide brief. We all know the feeling well. My specific question is about the meeting in Canada between the Foreign Secretary and the US Secretary of State. In light of the national security strategy that the United States issued only last week, what assessment have His Majesty’s Government made of the relationship, particularly as we go forward, with more than 100 conflicts raging around the world?

Asked by
Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
11 December 2025
Reference
851 c335
House
House of Lords

I am grateful for the support of the noble Lord for my taking on a number of issues today. The US strategy, which I saw earlier this week, is a matter for the US Government, but, self-evidently, the United Kingdom wants to participate and support where there are common objectives. As the noble Lord will have seen, this week the Prime Minister met the German Chancellor, the Ukrainian

President and others to look at the challenges we face in Europe. I believe very strongly that a strong European partnership, where we increase defence expenditure in Europe and, at the same time, work with our American partners on key issues, is the right way forward. It is for the Americans to determine their priorities. It is for us to determine ours.

Answered by
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
11 December 2025
Reference
851 c335
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my noble friend the Minister was on the Intelligence and Security Committee when it looked at detainee mistreatment and rendition in 2018. That report led to the Government of the day reviewing the consolidated guidance, which led to the Fulforth principles, which are very clear that we do not share intelligence if it leads to extrajudicial killing. Can he confirm that those principles are still active today and are understood not only by our security services but our allies? I assure the House, having been in Washington this week, that the intelligence sharing and co-operation are as strong as ever.

Asked by
Lord Beamish (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
11 December 2025
Reference
851 c336
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to my noble friend for reminding me of my time on the Intelligence and Security Committee, and I am grateful to him for his work chairing it now. He has articulated the principles of information sharing. He will understand that I cannot comment on the details of intelligence sharing, but the UK will commit to and retain its legal responsibilities in that field.

Answered by
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
11 December 2025
Reference
851 c336
House
House of Lords

My Lords, when the Government took the political decision to ban some arms to Israel and to then recognise the Palestinian state in a series of anti-Israel measures, the Israeli Government said at that point that they might consider reducing or stopping intelligence sharing with the UK Government. Have the Government made an assessment of the likely damage that that would do to the UK?

Asked by
Lord Leigh of Hurley (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
11 December 2025
Reference
851 c336
House
House of Lords

We have common interests with the Israeli Government, and we should try to maintain that data-sharing arrangement. What they do and how they operate is a matter for them. It is important that we have as wide data sharing as possible and information sharing with important strategic partners. The Five Eyes partnership is the cornerstone of that, but self-evidently, where there are common interests, other parties would wish to share information on a basis. I would hope that the Government’s decision to recognise a Palestinian state does not impact upon the ability to look at wider threats, should they exist.

Answered by
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
11 December 2025
Reference
851 c336
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for the clarifications he has made during this Question. Can he confirm that the United Kingdom has sufficient assets in the Caribbean so as to continually fight against the scourge of the drug trade in that area?

Asked by
Earl of Courtown (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
11 December 2025
Reference
851 c336
House
House of Lords

I can assure the noble Earl, and for once, this question does fall within my direct responsibilities. There are a number of areas where the UK Government, particularly with the overseas territories, are working in partnership, looking at how we can support the reduction of drugs, the reduction of gang activity and the prevention of illegal migration

between overseas territories in the wider Caribbean area. We have a very strong partnership with the United States on dealing with those issues. Where there are particular stress points, we are, even now, looking at how we can support those overseas territories, particularly, which are under British responsibility as well, to ensure that we take that fight to the drugs barons on equal terms.

Answered by
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
11 December 2025
Reference
851 c336
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty’s Government why they have reportedly suspended some intelligence sharing with the United States of America.

Asked by
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
11 December 2025
Reference
851 cc334-6
House
House of Lords
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Joint Committee on the National Security Strategy
Date
28 April 2025
Reference
HC 851 2024-26
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

Lords statement on defence and security.

Lead member
Baroness Smith of Basildon
Department
Lord Privy Seal
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
26 February 2025
Reference
843 cc1745-1769
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will repeat the Statement made by the Prime Minister yesterday on defence and security:

“It is three years since Russia launched its vile assault on Ukraine and I would like to address the international situation and the implications for Britain’s national security. In my first week as Prime...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2025
Reference
843 cc1745-1759
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Baroness for repeating this eloquent and important Statement. In the three years since Putin’s tanks rolled into Ukraine, imagining then an easy victory, his brutal war still grinds on, at an immense cost to the Russian people, let alone the brave people of Ukraine....

Member
Lord True (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2025
Reference
843 cc1759-1761
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we welcome this Statement. From the outset of the brutal Russian invasion of Ukraine, there has been a consensus across Parliament that we must support the Ukrainian people in their struggle against aggression. We do so not just because they deserve our support in their own right but...

Member
Lord Newby (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2025
Reference
843 cc1746-1762
House
House of Lords