1-20 of 35 results for subject:USA
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.232 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.01 seconds
- Search query
- subject:USA
- We searched for
- subject_t:USA OR subject_t:"United States" OR subject_t:"United States of America" OR subject_t:US OR subject_ses:13557
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, if she will make an assessment of the potential environmental impact of off-road vehicles imported from the USA.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, if she will make an assessment of the potential environmental impact of off-road vehicles imported from the USA.
Any imported car or light goods vehicle up to 10 years old will require approval before it can be registered for use on the roads of Great Britian to ensure it meets prescribed environmental and safety requirements. There are several different approval schemes available, and the process will vary depending on the specific scheme and type of vehicle, but each contains provisions to minimise, as far as practicable, tailpipe emissions and risk to pedestrians. Imported vehicles over 10 years old are required to pass an annual roadworthiness test to assess their tailpipe emissions and ensure that they are safe.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, if she will make an assessment of the potential impact of off-road vehicles imported from the USA on pedestrian safety.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, if she will make an assessment of the potential impact of off-road vehicles imported from the USA on pedestrian safety.
Any imported car or light goods vehicle up to 10 years old will require approval before it can be registered for use on the roads of Great Britian to ensure it meets prescribed environmental and safety requirements. There are several different approval schemes available, and the process will vary depending on the specific scheme and type of vehicle, but each contains provisions to minimise, as far as practicable, tailpipe emissions and risk to pedestrians. Imported vehicles over 10 years old are required to pass an annual roadworthiness test to assess their tailpipe emissions and ensure that they are safe.
To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, whether she has held recent discussions with the (a) agriculture, (b) food standards, and (c) labour rights sectors on a potential trade deal with the US.
To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, whether she has held recent discussions with the (a) agriculture, (b) food standards, and (c) labour rights sectors on a potential trade deal with the US.
The UK and U.S. are expanding the work we do together across the full spectrum of our economic, technological, commercial and trade relations through the Atlantic Declaration. Discussions with the U.S. on next steps under this first-of-its-kind agreement are ongoing.
Ministers and officials regularly engage with a wide range of stakeholders including business groups, civil society and SMEs in both the UK and the U.S. on a range of trade matters.
We will also continue to update Parliament as our work develops. The Department also hosts updates on the Government’s trade agenda. These sessions are open to all MPs.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what estimate his Department has made of the potential cost to the public purse of storing US nuclear weapons at USAF Lakenheath; and from which budget heading that funding would be drawn.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what estimate his Department has made of the potential cost to the public purse of storing US nuclear weapons at USAF Lakenheath; and from which budget heading that funding would be drawn.
The Ministry of Defence is unable to comment on US spending decisions and capabilities, which are a matter for the US Government. It remains longstanding UK and NATO policy to neither confirm nor deny the presence of nuclear weapons at a given location.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, who will make the final decision on storage of US Nuclear Weapons at USAF Lakenheath.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, who will make the final decision on storage of US Nuclear Weapons at USAF Lakenheath.
The Ministry of Defence is unable to comment on US spending decisions and capabilities, which are a matter for the US Government. It remains longstanding UK and NATO policy to neither confirm nor deny the presence of nuclear weapons at a given location.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what discussions he his Department has had with (a) Local Accident and Emergency Departments (b) Police, Fire and Ambulance Services and (c) the police regarding the planned storage of US nuclear weapons at USAF Lakenheath in Suffolk.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what discussions he his Department has had with (a) Local Accident and Emergency Departments (b) Police, Fire and Ambulance Services and (c) the police regarding the planned storage of US nuclear weapons at USAF Lakenheath in Suffolk.
The Ministry of Defence is unable to comment on US spending decisions and capabilities, which are a matter for the US Government. It remains longstanding UK and NATO policy to neither confirm nor deny the presence of nuclear weapons at a given location.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what discussions his Department has had with Emergency Contingency Planning Departments or Emergency Planning Officers regarding the planned storage of US nuclear weapons at USAF Lakenheath in Suffolk.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what discussions his Department has had with Emergency Contingency Planning Departments or Emergency Planning Officers regarding the planned storage of US nuclear weapons at USAF Lakenheath in Suffolk.
The Ministry of Defence is unable to comment on US spending decisions and capabilities, which are a matter for the US Government. It remains longstanding UK and NATO policy to neither confirm nor deny the presence of nuclear weapons at a given location.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what discussions he has had with (a) ministers and (b) hon Members regarding the planned storage of US nuclear weapons at USAF Lakenheath in Suffolk.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what discussions he has had with (a) ministers and (b) hon Members regarding the planned storage of US nuclear weapons at USAF Lakenheath in Suffolk.
The Ministry of Defence is unable to comment on US spending decisions and capabilities, which are a matter for the US Government. It remains longstanding UK and NATO policy to neither confirm nor deny the presence of nuclear weapons at a given location.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, whether there are plans for US nuclear weapons to be stored at RAF Lakenheath.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, whether there are plans for US nuclear weapons to be stored at RAF Lakenheath.
The Ministry of Defence is unable to comment on US spending decisions and capabilities, which are a matter for the US Government. It remains longstanding UK and NATO policy to neither confirm nor deny the presence of nuclear weapons at a given location.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many US personnel are stationed at RAF Fylingdales.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many US personnel are stationed at RAF Fylingdales.
There are currently approximately 320 personnel based at RAF Fylingdales (Service personnel, Ministry of Defence Police, and civilian staff), with fewer than 10 of those being US personnel.
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what steps he is taking to learn from international efforts to accelerate the replacement of animal experiments with human-relevant methods, including (a) the commitment made by the United States Environmental Protection Agency to stop funding and requesting tests...
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what steps he is taking to learn from international efforts to accelerate the replacement of animal experiments with human-relevant methods, including (a) the commitment made by the United States Environmental Protection Agency to stop funding and requesting tests...
UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) is committed to ensuring that the UK remains at the forefront of global efforts to improve the use and welfare of laboratory animals. The use of animals in research is carefully regulated and remains important in ensuring new medicines and treatments are safe.â¯The government funds the development and dissemination ofâ¯techniques that replace, reduce and refine the use of animals in research (the 3Rs).⯠This is achieved primarily through UKRI funding for the National Centre for the 3Rs (NC3Rs) which works nationally and internationally to drive the uptakeâ¯of 3Rs technologies and ensure that advances in the 3Rs are reflected in policy, practice and regulations on animal research.â¯Across the UK, the NC3Rs has invested £71â¯million in researchâ¯through grantsâ¯to universities.
We recognise the important signal that the commitment of the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to phase out animal testing on mammals by 2035 sends. The UK through the NC3Rs has been effective at changing international regulations on chemical and pharmaceutical safety assessment. For example, the US Office of Pesticide Programs which is part of the US Environmental Protection Agency has recently changed its fish testing requirements for bioconcentration factor studies based on the NC3Rs work in this area.
The NC3RS CRACK IT Challenges, which funds R&D to solve major challenges relating to the use of animals, includes funded research teams in the EU with the NC3Rs committing £4.35 million to teams led by organisations in the Netherlands. The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development has launched Create2Solve, a funding call in its âMore Knowledge with Fewer Animalsâ programme, that is entirely based on the NC3Rs CRACK IT Challenges programme.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many (a) US and (b) UK personnel working at US bases in the UK have been admitted to hospital with covid-19; and how many of those people were admitted to (i) an NHS hospital in the UK and (ii) a US...
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many (a) US and (b) UK personnel working at US bases in the UK have been admitted to hospital with covid-19; and how many of those people were admitted to (i) an NHS hospital in the UK and (ii) a US...
The Ministry of Defence does not require the US authorities to share information regarding COVID-19 for their personnel based in the UK. The Department has no reported instances of UK Armed Forces personnel working on US bases in the UK being hospitalised as a result of the COVID-19 Pandemic.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many US personnel at (a) USAF Lakenheath, (b) USAF Mildenhall, (c) the Joint Intelligence and Analysis Center at Molesworth, (d) USAF Croughton, (e) USAF Fairford and (e) USAF Feltwell have tested positive for covid-19 since March 2020.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many US personnel at (a) USAF Lakenheath, (b) USAF Mildenhall, (c) the Joint Intelligence and Analysis Center at Molesworth, (d) USAF Croughton, (e) USAF Fairford and (e) USAF Feltwell have tested positive for covid-19 since March 2020.
The Ministry of Defence does not currently require the US authorities to share information regarding COVID-19 test results for their personnel based in the UK. There is however a requirement for any positive results to be communicated to the UK's National Testing Programme.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, how many US personnel hold diplomatic immunity at (a) RAF Menwith Hill, (b) The Joint Intelligence and Analysis Centre at Molesworth, (c) RAF Fairford, (d) RAF Lakenheath and (e) RAF Mildenhall.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, how many US personnel hold diplomatic immunity at (a) RAF Menwith Hill, (b) The Joint Intelligence and Analysis Centre at Molesworth, (c) RAF Fairford, (d) RAF Lakenheath and (e) RAF Mildenhall.
US personnel at the establishments listed do not enjoy privileges and immunities under the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, 1961.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, further to the Answer of 9 June 2020 to Question 55019, on Waste Disposal: Applications, whether US fire fighting services use fire fighting foam containing (a) PFBS, (b) PFHpA, (c) PFHxS, (d) PFOS and (e) PFOA materials on US bases in the...
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, further to the Answer of 9 June 2020 to Question 55019, on Waste Disposal: Applications, whether US fire fighting services use fire fighting foam containing (a) PFBS, (b) PFHpA, (c) PFHxS, (d) PFOS and (e) PFOA materials on US bases in the...
The information needed to answer the hon. Member's question will take time to collate. I will write to him when it is available.
To ask the Secretary of State for International Trade, if she will revoke existing licences to export riot gear to the US.
To ask the Secretary of State for International Trade, if she will revoke existing licences to export riot gear to the US.
My Rt Hon. Friend the Secretary of State for International Trade and I have been sorry to see the violence that has taken place in the United States of America.
All export licence applications are assessed on a case-by-case basis against the Consolidated EU and National Arms Export Licensing Criteria (‘Consolidated Criteria’). In reaching a decision, the Department for International Trade receives advice from a number of Departments including the Ministry of Defence and the Foreign and Commonwealth Office. Together, we draw on all available information, including reports from NGOs and our diplomatic missions. The Consolidated Criteria provides a thorough risk assessment framework and requires us to think hard about the impact of exporting any equipment. These are not decisions my Department takes lightly, and we will not license the export of items where to do so would be inconsistent with the Consolidated Criteria.
Any licence granted by my Rt Hon. Friend the Secretary of State for International Trade may be subject to conditions. In addition, in line with the Consolidated Criteria, my Department is able to review licences – and suspend or revoke as necessary – when circumstances require. There are currently eight extant licences that may be linked to law enforcement agencies. Six are Open Individual Export Licences (‘OIELs’), which have potential end users that include law enforcement agencies. Two are Standard Individual Export Licences (‘SIELs’), which have numerous potential end users that include law enforcement agencies. There are also 15 Open General Licences (‘OGLs’) for which businesses can register that cover the export of anti-riot gear.
Much information is in the public domain already. We publish information on all export licences issued, refused and revoked on a quarterly and annual basis as official statistics on GOV.UK – at: gov.uk/government/collections/strategic-export-controls-licensing-data – and whilst data on actual exports is not required to be centrally held, the licences issued until the end of December 2019 are available.
To ask the Secretary of State for International Trade, what the current status is of export licenses to the US for anti-riot gear.
To ask the Secretary of State for International Trade, what the current status is of export licenses to the US for anti-riot gear.
My Rt Hon. Friend the Secretary of State for International Trade and I have been sorry to see the violence that has taken place in the United States of America.
All export licence applications are assessed on a case-by-case basis against the Consolidated EU and National Arms Export Licensing Criteria (‘Consolidated Criteria’). In reaching a decision, the Department for International Trade receives advice from a number of Departments including the Ministry of Defence and the Foreign and Commonwealth Office. Together, we draw on all available information, including reports from NGOs and our diplomatic missions. The Consolidated Criteria provides a thorough risk assessment framework and requires us to think hard about the impact of exporting any equipment. These are not decisions my Department takes lightly, and we will not license the export of items where to do so would be inconsistent with the Consolidated Criteria.
Any licence granted by my Rt Hon. Friend the Secretary of State for International Trade may be subject to conditions. In addition, in line with the Consolidated Criteria, my Department is able to review licences – and suspend or revoke as necessary – when circumstances require. There are currently eight extant licences that may be linked to law enforcement agencies. Six are Open Individual Export Licences (‘OIELs’), which have potential end users that include law enforcement agencies. Two are Standard Individual Export Licences (‘SIELs’), which have numerous potential end users that include law enforcement agencies. There are also 15 Open General Licences (‘OGLs’) for which businesses can register that cover the export of anti-riot gear.
Much information is in the public domain already. We publish information on all export licences issued, refused and revoked on a quarterly and annual basis as official statistics on GOV.UK – at: gov.uk/government/collections/strategic-export-controls-licensing-data – and whilst data on actual exports is not required to be centrally held, the licences issued until the end of December 2019 are available.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether the Government plans to introduce mandatory driving tests for US personnel coming to work on US bases before being permitted to drive on UK roads.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether the Government plans to introduce mandatory driving tests for US personnel coming to work on US bases before being permitted to drive on UK roads.
US Department of Defense (DoD) military and civilian personnel stationed at US military bases in the UK, and who are subject to the NATO Status of Forces Agreement, are permitted to drive on their domestic licenses. However, the US DoD requires its military and civilian personnel, and their dependents, to pass a DVLA written driving test before permitting their staff to drive in the UK. US diplomatic staff, to whom the NATO Status of Forces Agreement does not apply, can apply to the DVLA for a Diplomatic Driving Permit without taking any further tests but, in the interim, may drive in the UK on their domestic licenses for a period of up to one year.
That this House condemns US peace envoy Jason Greenblatt's comments made in an interview with PBS on 17 July 2019, in which Greenblatt rejected the term occupied to describe the West Bank and described as pejorative the use of the word settlements; notes that the Oslo Accords recognised that land as occupied and the settlements as part of the West Bank and not Israel; and urges the Government to press the US to return to the Oslo Accords and restart the negotiating process according to Article V of the Accords.
That this House condemns US peace envoy Jason Greenblatt's comments made in an interview with PBS on 17 July 2019, in which Greenblatt rejected the term occupied to describe the West Bank and described as pejorative the use of the word settlements; notes that the Oslo Accords recognised that land...
That this House condemns the US negotiated Economic Plan for Palestinian Development; notes that the plan doesn't lift the security measures in place preventing freedom of movement or guarantee return of land annexed by Israel; and is concerned that the political plan being drawn up in Washington DC will attach significant loss of land and freedoms in return for economic support, which would undermine the Oslo Accords.
That this House condemns the US negotiated Economic Plan for Palestinian Development; notes that the plan doesn't lift the security measures in place preventing freedom of movement or guarantee return of land annexed by Israel; and is concerned that the political plan being drawn up in Washington DC will attach...