Skip to main content

1-17 of 17 results for subject:Uprating

Primary member X
Russell, Earl

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

More
Russell, Earl (17)

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

How and when it came about that British subjects resident in former Yugoslavia are entitled to annual uprating of their state pensions while British subjects resident in Canada are not; and what is the logical principle which justifies the difference between the treatment of British subjects to former Yugoslavia and...

Asked by
Earl Russell (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 November 2002
Reference
641 c25-6WA; HL 12
House
House of Lords

What is the estimated cost to public funds of the increase in the minimum income guarantee to pensioners announced in this year's budget. [HL 1726].

Asked by
Earl Russell (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
4 April 2000
Reference
HL 1726; 611 c129WA
House
House of Lords

What would be the cost to the social security budget of failure to uprate the minimum wage in line with inflation. [HL 539]. - Includes figures,

Asked by
Earl Russell (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 January 2000
Reference
HL 539; 608 c178WA
House
House of Lords

Further to Lady Hollis of Heighams remarks on 3 June 580 c632, indicating that it would cost £1.9bn. to raise income- related benefits by £5 a head, how many people would need to come off benefit to render such an increase cost neutral. - £1.9b. is the cost of the...

Asked by
Earl Russell (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
14 July 1997
Reference
581 c101WA
House
House of Lords
Further to Lord Mackay of Ardbrecknish's Written Answer (9 January, WA14), what were the cost implications for the Department of Health identified in considering the proposals for lone parents announced in the social security uprating Statement and why they have assessed these costs as negligible.
Asked by
Earl Russell (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
14 March 1996
Reference
570 c943
House
House of Lords
1st supplementary on same.
Asked by
Earl Russell (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
14 March 1996
Reference
570 c943
House
House of Lords

On what date the Department of Health was first consulted about the proposals for lone parents announced in the Social Security Uprating Statement on 29 November 1995.

Asked by
Earl Russell (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
23 January 1996
Reference
568 c65WA
House
House of Lords

Under the Treasury guidelines which demand that a department considering policy changes consider the resource implications for other departments, what implications for the Inland Revenue have been identified as resulting from the changes in Housing Benefit for the under 25s, announced in the Social Security Uprating Statement.

Asked by
Earl Russell (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 January 1996
Reference
568 c14WA
House
House of Lords

Further to Lord Lucas' Written Answer of 28 November (H.L. Deb., c39WA), whether any increase in rough sleeping is planned for as a result of the measures on housing benefit for the under 25s announced in the Social Security Uprating Statement.

Asked by
Earl Russell (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 January 1996
Reference
568 c15WA
House
House of Lords

What cost implications for the Department of the Environment were identified, under the Treasury guidelines which require any department considering policy changes to consider the resource implications for other departments, as arising from the proposals on Income Support for Asylum Seekers announced in the Social Security Uprating Statement.

Asked by
Earl Russell (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 January 1996
Reference
568 c16WA
House
House of Lords

Given the Treasury guidelines demand that any department planning policy changes consider the resource implications for the Department of Health were identified in considering the proposals for lone parents announced in the Social Security Uprating Statement.

Asked by
Earl Russell (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 January 1996
Reference
568 c14WA
House
House of Lords

Under the Treasury guidelines which demand that a department considering policy changes should consider the resource implications for other departments, what losses to Customs and Excise from reduced VAT have been identified as likely to arise from the decisions to freeze one parent benefit and lone parent premium, announced in...

Asked by
Earl Russell (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 January 1996
Reference
568 c14WA
House
House of Lords

If cash limit on grants paid for funerals through Social Fund will be uprated in line with means-tested benefits.

Asked by
Earl Russell (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 January 1995
Reference
560 c24WA
House
House of Lords

Whether the Youth Training Allowance and the Youth Training Bridging Allowance are being uprated this year. - There are no plans to uprate either allowance, but such matters are kept under review.

Asked by
Earl Russell (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 January 1995
Reference
560 c11WA
House
House of Lords

If HMGovt have any plans to uprate earnings disregard on income support, and when this disregard was last uprated.

Asked by
Earl Russell (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
12 October 1994
Reference
557 c117WA
House
House of Lords

When youth training bridging allowance was last uprated. - Youth training bridging allowance has not been uprated.

Asked by
Earl Russell (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
12 October 1994
Reference
557 c117WA
House
House of Lords

Following announcement in the Social Security Up-rating statement, when HMG intend to increase child benefit to mothers who are already in receipt of severe disablement allowance or invalid care allowance.

Asked by
Earl Russell (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 December 1990
Reference
524 c23WA
House
House of Lords