1-11 of 11 results for subject:"Road traffic"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.261 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.005 seconds
- Search query
- subject:"Road traffic"
- We searched for
- subject_t:"Road traffic" OR subject_t:"Traffic congestion" OR subject_t:"Traffic forecasting" OR subject_ses:92864
Primary member
X
Peyton of Yeovil, Lord
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
Primary member
More
Peyton of Yeovil, Lord (11)
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
1st supplementary on effect of Mayor's policies on congestion.
1st supplementary on effect of Mayor's policies on congestion.
Asked by
Lord Peyton of Yeovil
(Conservative)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
15 October 2002
Subjects
Greater London; Mayor of London; Road traffic; Road traffic control
Date
15 October 2002
Reference
639 c699
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
What recent discussions they have had with the Mayor of London concerning his proposals for the movement of both people and vehicles in the area within his control.
What recent discussions they have had with the Mayor of London concerning his proposals for the movement of both people and vehicles in the area within his control.
Asked by
Lord Peyton of Yeovil
(Conservative)
Answered by
Lord McIntosh of Haringey
(Labour)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
For answer on
15 October 2002
Answered on
15 October 2002
Subjects
Greater London; Mayor of London; Road traffic; Road traffic control
Date
15 October 2002
Reference
639 c699
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
Street Works Bill (HL). Lords second reading debate. Agreed to on question. Committed to a Committee of the Whole House.
Street Works Bill (HL). Lords second reading debate. Agreed to on question. Committed to a Committee of the Whole House.
Lead member
Lord Peyton of Yeovil
Answering member
Lord Whitty
Department
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions
Type
Debates on bills
Legislative stage
Second reading
Legislation
Street Works Bill (HL) 1999/2000
Subjects
Contracts; Fees and charges; Local government; Utilities; Road traffic; Roads; Road works
Date
30 June 2000
Reference
614 c1167-77
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
1st supplementary
1st supplementary
Asked by
Lord Peyton of Yeovil
(Conservative)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
10 May 2000
Subjects
Access; House of Lords; Palace of Westminster; Road traffic; Road works; Millbank
Date
10 May 2000
Reference
612 c1573
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
Lead member
Lord Peyton of Yeovil
Answering member
Lord Carter
Type
Private notice questions
Subjects
Access; House of Lords; Palace of Westminster; Road traffic; Road works; Millbank
Date
10 May 2000
Reference
612 c1573
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
For what reasons traffic in Piccadilly is to be reduced to one lane each way for a further 12 months and whether they will use their best endeavours to speed things up.
For what reasons traffic in Piccadilly is to be reduced to one lane each way for a further 12 months and whether they will use their best endeavours to speed things up.
Asked by
Lord Peyton of Yeovil
(Conservative)
Answered by
Lord Whitty
(Labour)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
For answer on
3 February 2000
Answered on
3 May 2000
Subjects
City of Westminster; Greater London; Telecommunications; Utilities; Road traffic; Road works
Date
3 May 2000
Reference
612 c1015-6
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
1st supplementary on charging telecommunication and utility companies for roadworks.
1st supplementary on charging telecommunication and utility companies for roadworks.
Asked by
Lord Peyton of Yeovil
(Conservative)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
3 May 2000
Subjects
City of Westminster; Greater London; Telecommunications; Utilities; Road traffic; Road works
Date
3 May 2000
Reference
612 c1015-6
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
Lords debate on motion to call attention to the number of statutory undertakers and others with powers to dig holes in the road. Motion withdrawn.
Lords debate on motion to call attention to the number of statutory undertakers and others with powers to dig holes in the road. Motion withdrawn.
Lead member
Lord Peyton of Yeovil
Answering member
Lord Brabazon of Tara
Department
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Parliamentary proceedings
Subjects
Codes of practice; Competition; Licensing; Greater London; Investment; Fines; Highways Agency; Local government; Powers; Planning; Motorways; Standards; Telecommunications; Transport; Utilities; Road traffic; Roads; Road works; Royal Automobile Club
Date
5 April 2000
Reference
611 c1305-34
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
1st supplementary on the need for more control over who has access to undertake road works and on publishing a list of these with undertaker's licence.
1st supplementary on the need for more control over who has access to undertake road works and on publishing a list of these with undertaker's licence.
Asked by
Lord Peyton of Yeovil
(Conservative)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
22 March 2000
Subjects
Access; Codes of practice; Licensing; Information; Utilities; Road traffic; Roads; Repairs and maintenance; Road works
Date
22 March 2000
Reference
611 c269-70,272
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
Whether they will require all those whose operations have the effect of denying or partially denying use of the highway to normal traffic to exhibit at the site notices stating who they are, what is the purpose of the work they are undertaking and for how long it will continue.
Whether they will require all those whose operations have the effect of denying or partially denying use of the highway to normal traffic to exhibit at the site notices stating who they are, what is the purpose of the work they are undertaking and for how long it will continue.
Asked by
Lord Peyton of Yeovil
(Conservative)
Answered by
Lord Whitty
(Labour)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
For answer on
22 March 2000
Answered on
22 March 2000
Subjects
Access; Codes of practice; Licensing; Information; Utilities; Road traffic; Roads; Repairs and maintenance; Road works
Date
22 March 2000
Reference
611 c269-70,272
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
What further news they have concerning the millennium dome.
What further news they have concerning the millennium dome.
Asked by
Lord Peyton of Yeovil
(Conservative)
Answered by
Lord Falconer of Thoroton
(Labour)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
For answer on
8 February 1999
Answered on
8 February 1999
Subjects
Access; Costs; Parking; Road traffic; Millennium exhibition
Date
8 February 1999
Reference
597 c1-2
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords