Skip to main content

1-3 of 3 results for subject:USA

Primary member X
Moore, Michael
Subject X
Iran

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

More
Moore, Michael (3)

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Iran’s continued flouting of its nuclear obligations is worrying and unacceptable, and the international community must be clear and united in delivering that message. Does the Foreign Secretary agree that the diplomatic initiatives by Condoleezza Rice have been consistent with those of Europe and others in efforts to make Iran comply with United Nations resolutions? If so, does the Foreign Secretary agree that Vice-President Cheney’s recent speech, in which he threatened the use of naval power against Iran, delivered as it was while he stood on the deck of one of the two American aircraft carriers just off the coast of Iran, undermined that diplomatic approach and was counter-productive?
Asked by
Michael Moore (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
5 June 2007
Reference
461 c123
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what discussions (a) Ministers and (b) officials in her Department have had with United States officials on the offer by Iran in May 2003 of direct talks with the United States.

Asked by
Michael Moore (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
5 June 2006
Reference
447 c325W; 70937
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, what discussions he has had with his (a) European Union and (b) US counterparts with regards to the negotiation of a new Trade and Co-operation Agreement with Iran; and if he will make a statement.

Asked by
Michael Moore (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
1 February 2005
Reference
210792; 430 c863W
House
House of Commons