1-6 of 6 results for subject:Surveillance
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.199 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.004 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Surveillance
- We searched for
- subject_t:Surveillance OR subject_t:"Interception of mail" OR subject_t:"Investigatory powers" OR subject_ses:93176
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
Primary member
More
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
Publisher
GCHQ and our other security agencies have, unfortunately, all too much to do without delving into the personal communications of innocent citizens, but will the Home Secretary reassure the House that any abuse that occurred of such intrusive powers would, under the new legislation, constitute a criminal offence?
GCHQ and our other security agencies have, unfortunately, all too much to do without delving into the personal communications of innocent citizens, but will the Home Secretary reassure the House that any abuse that occurred of such intrusive powers would, under the new legislation, constitute a criminal offence?
Yes, I am happy to give my right hon. Friend the reassurance that he requires in relation to including within the Bill offences that would apply were abuse to take place in the use of the powers. He is absolutely right in saying that of course the security and intelligence agencies do not have the time, the effort or indeed the intention or desire to look into the communications of everybody in this country; they are focusing very clearly on those who are suspected of wanting to do us harm.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence when the main gate decision will be taken for the next generation of the Royal Navy's airborne surveillance and control capability; whether the Royal Navy's existing capability will continue at current levels until the successor system is available; what assessment he has...
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence when the main gate decision will be taken for the next generation of the Royal Navy's airborne surveillance and control capability; whether the Royal Navy's existing capability will continue at current levels until the successor system is available; what assessment he has...
The Project which will deliver the next generation of airborne surveillance, CROWSNEST, entered the third element of its assessment phase in March 2013. Work is currently under way to finalise the Main Gate investment decision. The Royal Navy's airborne surveillance is currently provided by the Sea King platform,
which is due to be taken out of service in 2016. Until CROWSNEST enters service, surveillance capability will be provided by other platforms and systems working together in a layered defence approach to support the UK Task Group, but these other platforms will not be able to eliminate entirely the Royal Navy's organic gap in airborne early warning capability.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, if he will make a statement about British unmanned aerial vehicles lost in the Balkans theatre since March 1998.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, if he will make a statement about British unmanned aerial vehicles lost in the Balkans theatre since March 1998.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, if he will make a statement on the monitoring of British military communications during the Kosovo campaign by (a) Serb forces and (b) the Kosovo Liberation Army.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, if he will make a statement on the monitoring of British military communications during the Kosovo campaign by (a) Serb forces and (b) the Kosovo Liberation Army.