Further to the Written Answer by Lord Falconer of Thoroton on 24 May, 601 c67WA, what are the reasons for confining their review of the organisation of public sector ombudsmen to England. [HL 4110].

Further to the Written Answer by Lord Falconer of Thoroton on 24 May, 601 c67WA, what are the reasons for confining their review of the organisation of public sector ombudsmen to England. [HL 4110].

Further to the Written Answer by the Lord Falconer of Thoroton on 24 May, 601 c67WA, whether their review of the organisation of public sector ombudsmen in England is likely to be concluded and published before the end of 1999; and, if not, when is the probable date of publication....

Further to the Written Answer by the Lord Falconer of Thoroton on 24 May, 601 c67WA, whether their review of the organisation of public sector ombudsmen in England is likely to be concluded and published before the end of 1999; and, if not, when is the probable date of publication....

Further to the Written Answer by the Lord Falconer of Thoroton of 7 May 1999, 600 c116-7WA, whether it is within the terms of reference of the review of the organisation of the public sector ombudsmen in England to consider whether parliament should be consulted about the appointment of a...

Further to the Written Answer by the Lord Falconer of Thoroton of 7 May 1999, 600 c116-7WA, whether it is within the terms of reference of the review of the organisation of the public sector ombudsmen in England to consider whether parliament should be consulted about the appointment of a...

Whether they consider that Parliament should be consulted about the appointment of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration; and if not, why not. [HL 2218].

Whether they consider that Parliament should be consulted about the appointment of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration; and if not, why not. [HL 2218].