Skip to main content

1-14 of 14 results for subject:"House of Commons"

Primary member X
Harman, Baroness

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

More
Harman, Baroness (14)

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Motion that this House believes that it would be to the benefit of the functioning of parliamentary democracy that honourable Members who have had a baby or adopted a child should for a period of time be entitled, but not required, to discharge their responsibilities to vote in this House...

Lead member
Baroness Harman
Answering member
Valerie Vaz; Andrea Leadsom
Department
Leader of the House of Commons
Type
Backbench debates
Date
1 February 2018
Reference
635 cc1013-1051
House
House of Commons
I welcome the Deputy Prime Minister back to the Dispatch Box. At least today it has not slipped his mind that he is Deputy Prime Minister. May I follow up on the question asked by the hon. Member for South Northamptonshire (Andrea Leadsom)? The Deputy Prime Minister talked about how the Lib Dems represent trust in politics—a politics that keeps its promises. Will he remind the House what he promised at the general election about police numbers?
Asked by
Baroness Harman (Labour)
Answering body
Deputy Prime Minister
Topical questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
1 March 2011
Reference
524 c150-1
House
House of Commons
But that has not stopped the Government spending £100 million on elected police commissioners, and the Deputy Prime Minister has not answered the question; perhaps it has slipped his memory again. May I remind him? He promised 3,000 more police, and he has voted for 10,000 fewer police. Is the problem not just his forgetting that he is Deputy Prime Minister, but that he has forgotten every promise he ever made? Is he aware that his complete betrayal on tuition fees, VAT, the NHS and the police has led to a new word in the English language: if someone has been the victim of a total sell-out, we say that they have been ““clegged””? Is he proud of that?
Asked by
Baroness Harman (Labour)
Answering body
Deputy Prime Minister
Topical questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
1 March 2011
Reference
524 c151
House
House of Commons
Lead member
Baroness Harman
Department
Leader of the House of Commons
Type
Observations on petitions
Date
8 April 2010
Reference
508 c52P
House
House of Commons

Statement on paid advocacy and lobbying.

Lead member
Baroness Harman
Department
Leader of the House of Commons
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
22 March 2010
Reference
508 c25-37
House
House of Commons

Debate on motions to amend standing orders relating to chair (terminology), agreed on division (206 to 90); Election of committee chairs, amendment agreed to on division (279 to 31), motion agreed on question, with amendment; Resignation or removal of chairs of select committees (resolved); Election of Members of select committees,...

Lead member
Baroness Harman
Answering member
Lord Young of Cookham
Department
Leader of the House of Commons
Type
Debates
Date
4 March 2010
Reference
506 c1062-100
House
House of Commons

Debate on a motion to consider the matter of the House of Commons Reform Committee report on Rebuilding the House (HC 1117 2008-09), and the Liaison Committee first report of session 2009-10, on Rebuilding the House: Select Committee Issues, (HC 272 2009-10).

Lead member
Baroness Harman
Answering member
Lord Young of Cookham
Department
Leader of the House of Commons
Type
Debates
Date
22 February 2010
Reference
506 c37-127
House
House of Commons

Statement on parliamentary standards.

Lead member
Baroness Harman
Department
Leader of the House of Commons
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
23 June 2009
Reference
494 c678-91
House
House of Commons

Statement on members' allowances and proposals for a new parliamentary standards authority.

Lead member
Baroness Harman
Department
Leader of the House of Commons
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
20 May 2009
Reference
492 c1505-19
House
House of Commons

Debate on a motion that, following the search of a Member's office in the Parliamentary Estate by the police and the seizure of material therein, a committee be appointed to review the internal processes of the House administration for granting permission for such action, and to make recommendations for the...

Lead member
Baroness Harman
Answering member
Baroness May of Maidenhead
Department
Leader of the House of Commons
Type
Debates
Date
8 December 2008
Reference
485 c255-305
House
House of Commons

Debate on a motion to approve the Committee on Standards and Privileges fourth report of session 2007-08 (HC 280) and to suspend Mr Derek Conway from the service of the House for a period of ten sitting days. Agreed on question.

Lead member
Baroness Harman
Department
Leader of the House of Commons
Type
Debates
Date
31 January 2008
Reference
471 c481-90
House
House of Commons

Debate on a motion to approve the proposals for changes in the procedures and practices of the House set out in Cm 7231, the Government's response to the report of the Modernisation of the House Committee first report (HC 337), including the proposals for topical questions. Amendment negatived on division...

Lead member
Baroness Harman
Department
Leader of the House of Commons
Type
Debates
Date
25 October 2007
Reference
465 c441-502
House
House of Commons

When the honourable Member for Peckham will receive an Answer to the two questions about the effect of the 1995-96 tax changes, tabled for answer on 31st January. - Today.

Asked by
Baroness Harman (Labour)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 February 1994
Reference
237 c891W
House
House of Commons

If he will establish a review of the hours at which the House sits and the dates of the summer recess. - Nothing to add to the reply at 182 c452.

Asked by
Baroness Harman (Labour)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 December 1990
Reference
182 c261W;182 c261W
House
House of Commons