1-4 of 4 results for subject:"Supreme Court"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.198 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.003 seconds
- Search query
- subject:"Supreme Court"
- We searched for
- subject_t:"Supreme Court" OR subject_t:"UK Supreme Court" OR subject_ses:93171
Primary member
X
Ferrers, Earl
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
Primary member
More
Ferrers, Earl (4)
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
Publisher
My Lords, could I be a little more helpful to the Minister? My noble friend asked what the Government’s estimate was in the beginning. I think the Minister said that it was made in 2007, but if he reads the Written Statement on 14 December 2004, he will see that the noble and learned Lord the Lord Chancellor said: ""The cost of establishing the Supreme Court at Middlesex Guildhall will be approximately £30 million".—[Official Report, 14/12/04; col. WS 72.]"
My Lords, could I be a little more helpful to the Minister? My noble friend asked what the Government’s estimate was in the beginning. I think the Minister said that it was made in 2007, but if he reads the Written Statement on 14 December 2004, he will see that the noble and learned Lord the Lord Chancellor said: ""The cost of establishing the Supreme Court at Middlesex Guildhall will be approximately £30 million".—[Official Report, 14/12/04; col. WS 72.]"
Asked by
Earl Ferrers
(Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
23 April 2009
My Lords, again, I am grateful to the noble Earl.
Subjects
Supreme Court
Date
23 April 2009
Reference
709 c1603
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
My Lords, is the noble Lord aware that the brevity of his reply will be appreciated by everyone for its rarity as well as its brevity? Does he realise that the same building in its earlier incarnation had the address of Little George Street? Why, if it is the same building now, have the Government changed the name? If they are going to change the name, why not change it to something really grand—with deference to the Duke of Wellington, why not call it No. 2 London?
My Lords, is the noble Lord aware that the brevity of his reply will be appreciated by everyone for its rarity as well as its brevity? Does he realise that the same building in its earlier incarnation had the address of Little George Street? Why, if it is the same building now, have the Government changed the name? If they are going to change the name, why not change it to something really grand—with deference to the Duke of Wellington, why not call it No. 2 London?
Asked by
Earl Ferrers
(Conservative)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
23 April 2009
My Lords, the reason why the address will be changed is that at the moment Little George Street is the street on which the front entrance to the building is situated. The front entrance will alter to face Parliament Square, so the address will be Parliament Square.
Subjects
Supreme Court
Date
23 April 2009
Reference
709 c1602
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what is to be the postal address of the new Supreme Court.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what is to be the postal address of the new Supreme Court.
Asked by
Earl Ferrers
(Conservative)
Answered by
Lord Bach
(Labour)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
For answer on
23 April 2009
Answered on
23 April 2009
My Lords, the address will be: the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, Parliament Square, London SW1.
Subjects
Supreme Court
Date
23 April 2009
Reference
709 c1601
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
My Lords, perhaps the noble and learned Lord will be good enough to agree on this thing, too. Is it not a fact that in order to place the new Supreme Court in the new buildings, about 14 other courts will have to be rehoused? Do the figures that he has given us include the rehousing of those courts?
My Lords, perhaps the noble and learned Lord will be good enough to agree on this thing, too. Is it not a fact that in order to place the new Supreme Court in the new buildings, about 14 other courts will have to be rehoused? Do the figures that he has given us include the rehousing of those courts?
Asked by
Earl Ferrers
(Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
24 July 2006
My Lords, the figure is seven, not 14; and no, they do not. The Question is on the cost of the Supreme Court.
Subjects
Costs; Supreme Court
Date
24 July 2006
Reference
684 c1539
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords