1-17 of 17 results for subject:Reviews
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.258 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.006 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Reviews
- We searched for
- subject_t:Reviews OR subject_ses:12492
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
Primary member
More
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
My Lords, could the Minister tell us how many of these competences he expects the Government to have agreed by 2017?
My Lords, could the Minister tell us how many of these competences he expects the Government to have agreed by 2017?
My Lords, it is not a question of which competences we agree. We are asking various stakeholders, and getting very large pieces of evidence from producer groups, about the current balance of competences. I think that the Scotch Whisky Association has produced the most pieces of evidence so far—clearly a stakeholder. As Ministers have said before from this Dispatch Box, the current Lisbon treaty has a lot of headroom on competences, not all of which are currently exercised by the European Union. We are asking stakeholders to say whether they are happy with the current balance, whether there are areas in which they would like the balance to be tipped back towards the national level or whether there are areas in which they would like the balance to be tipped further towards common European policies.
What review they have made of the 40 per cent of total operating costs not included in paragraph 2.1 of the KPMG review of the costs of the Home Office’s identity cards.
What review they have made of the 40 per cent of total operating costs not included in paragraph 2.1 of the KPMG review of the costs of the Home Office’s identity cards.
Whether they accept the recommendation in the KPMG review of the costs of the Home Office identity cards programme that a more detailed risk-based approach, such as quantitative risk analysis, should be considered for estimating the total cost of the proposed identity card scheme.
Whether they accept the recommendation in the KPMG review of the costs of the Home Office identity cards programme that a more detailed risk-based approach, such as quantitative risk analysis, should be considered for estimating the total cost of the proposed identity card scheme.
Whether they have any plans to increase the margin of contingency costs of the Home Office identity cards programme, given that the KPMG review of the costs of the programme noted in paragraph 4.1.4.1 that the 20 per cent contingency factor had in some cases been reduced to 8 per cent.
Whether they have any plans to increase the margin of contingency costs of the Home Office identity cards programme, given that the KPMG review of the costs of the programme noted in paragraph 4.1.4.1 that the 20 per cent contingency factor had in some cases been reduced to 8 per cent.
In the light of paragraph 4.1.7.1 of the KPMG review of the costs of the Home Office’s identity cards programme, which states that the outline business case review does not present a range of alternative approaches and therefore is not consistent with HM Treasury’s Green Book guidance, what action they...
In the light of paragraph 4.1.7.1 of the KPMG review of the costs of the Home Office’s identity cards programme, which states that the outline business case review does not present a range of alternative approaches and therefore is not consistent with HM Treasury’s Green Book guidance, what action they...
Whether the recommendation in paragraph 4.3.2 of the KPMG review of the costs of the Home Office’s identity cards programme that, given the inconclusive evidence for the lifespan of the cards, an increase in damage rates for the cards in the latter stages of the first ten years should be...
Whether the recommendation in paragraph 4.3.2 of the KPMG review of the costs of the Home Office’s identity cards programme that, given the inconclusive evidence for the lifespan of the cards, an increase in damage rates for the cards in the latter stages of the first ten years should be...
Whether they have implemented the recommendation in paragraph 4.4.2 of the KPMG review of the costs of the Home Office’s identity cards programme that the five year depreciation assumption for mobile enrolment centres should be increased to eight years.
Whether they have implemented the recommendation in paragraph 4.4.2 of the KPMG review of the costs of the Home Office’s identity cards programme that the five year depreciation assumption for mobile enrolment centres should be increased to eight years.
What was the fee paid to KPMG for its review of the costs of the Home Office’s identity cards programme.
What was the fee paid to KPMG for its review of the costs of the Home Office’s identity cards programme.
Whether they agree with the implementation timetable in paragraph 2.3 of the KPMG review of the costs of the Home Office’s identity cards programme.
Whether they agree with the implementation timetable in paragraph 2.3 of the KPMG review of the costs of the Home Office’s identity cards programme.
Lords debate on motion to call attention to the BBC charter renewal. Motion withdrawn.
Lords debate on motion to call attention to the BBC charter renewal. Motion withdrawn.
Lords statement on When they plan to publish the independent review of the National Asylum Support Service (NASS). [HL 4028]. - Incudes fact that key findings published today.
Lords statement on When they plan to publish the independent review of the National Asylum Support Service (NASS). [HL 4028]. - Incudes fact that key findings published today.
Lords statement on when the findings of the review of current practices and procedures relating to disclosure, associated investigation techniques and case management in HM Customs and Excise's criminal cases will be published and how the Government intends to respond to them. [HL 4030]. - Inc ref to 11 July...
Lords statement on when the findings of the review of current practices and procedures relating to disclosure, associated investigation techniques and case management in HM Customs and Excise's criminal cases will be published and how the Government intends to respond to them. [HL 4030]. - Inc ref to 11 July...
Lords debate on motion to call attention to the case for a review of the Barnett formula. Motion withdrawn.
Lords debate on motion to call attention to the case for a review of the Barnett formula. Motion withdrawn.