Skip to main content

1-20 of 38 results for subject:USA

Member X
Paul Holmes

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

It was on the news!

Member
Paul Holmes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 June 2026
Reference
786 c854
House
House of Commons

The Chief Secretary to the Prime Minister is well known for being courteous and passionate at the Dispatch Box, and I am a fan. [Hon. Members: “Hear, Hear.”] This is where I get to the bad part: he is not necessarily known for answering everybody’s questions when they ask them....

Member
Paul Holmes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 June 2026
Reference
786 c862
House
House of Commons

My right hon. Friend will remember that I asked the Prime Minister yesterday about the box note of 11 November 2024, in which Simon Case recommended that vetting be gone through before the appointment was made. The Prime Minister’s decision note did not include the Prime Minister’s decision, which has...

Member
Paul Holmes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 April 2026
Reference
784 c190
House
House of Commons

Will the hon. Member give way?

Member
Paul Holmes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 April 2026
Reference
784 c193
House
House of Commons

There must be a reshuffle coming, because no one would seriously make a speech like this at such serious times. The hon. Gentleman says that the Prime Minister was a stickler for process and claims that the Prime Minister somehow delegated responsibility for the appointment. Why did the former Cabinet...

Member
Paul Holmes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 April 2026
Reference
784 c198
House
House of Commons

In the box note to the Prime Minister dated 11 November 2024, the former Cabinet Secretary, Simon Case, advised the Prime Minister that before announcing a political appointee, he should get security clearance. The Prime Minister ignored that advice. The Prime Minister’s response in that box note is redacted, so...

Member
Paul Holmes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2026
Reference
784 c58
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman has just said that he thinks it is absolutely right that this House focuses on Peter Mandelson’s links with Jeffrey Epstein, and I welcome him for suddenly coming to that conclusion. Can I therefore ask him why the Prime Minister felt it necessary to appoint Mandelson as...

Member
Paul Holmes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2026
Reference
780 c327
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman’s speech is coming across to me as quite miraculous, and not in a good way. He is claiming that his Front Benchers have shown leadership this afternoon. Let us remind the House exactly what has happened: his party’s leadership and Front Benchers have changed their amendment to...

Member
Paul Holmes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2026
Reference
780 c329
House
House of Commons

According to reports, it is worse than that: Peter Mandelson had his fingertips throughout the whole of the Labour party, but also the Government. There are reports that after the Prime Minister had realised he had had a continuing relationship with Epstein, Mandelson was in No. 10 during the Cabinet...

Member
Paul Holmes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2026
Reference
780 c344
House
House of Commons

In response to the intervention from my right hon. Friend Member for Wetherby and Easingwold (Sir Alec Shelbrooke), there is a key difference between this Prime Minister and former Labour Prime Ministers, in that Gordon Brown and Tony Blair appointed Peter Mandelson without knowing some of the connections that he...

Member
Paul Holmes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2026
Reference
780 c349
House
House of Commons

On a point of order, Madam Deputy Speaker. Forgive me for detaining the House, but may I ask for your clarification on whether a Member saying that somebody in this House has been bought and paid for is in order?

Member
Paul Holmes (Conservative)
Type
Points of order
Date
4 February 2026
Reference
780 c354
House
House of Commons

As usual, my hon. Friend is making a good speech. I was a special adviser at the Cabinet Office—a great Department with great civil servants. She mentions the cases of Jonathan Powell, and of Lord Mandelson as Deputy Prime Minister. Does she agree that this backhanded way of conducting Government...

Member
Paul Holmes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2026
Reference
780 c359
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend will recall that during various parliamentary debates in the Chamber on Peter Mandelson, and despite the Prime Minister knowing that he had that relationship, at one stage she and I asked the Minister the simple question of whether the Government would strip Lord Mandelson of the Labour...

Member
Paul Holmes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2026
Reference
780 c361
House
House of Commons

I really must push the Minister, because he is giving conflicting messages. At one stage, he said that the direct contract award will be in scope of the ISC, without committing to any timescales. He has now said that the scope of the release of documents is a matter for...

Member
Paul Holmes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2026
Reference
780 c373
House
House of Commons

I thank the Minister for giving way; every time he comes to the House, he is most courteous. He mentioned the example of the former Prime Minister, but the former Prime Minister stated very clearly that the negotiations had to result in a “mutually beneficial” agreement. That did not happen,...

Member
Paul Holmes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 January 2026
Reference
779 c233
House
House of Commons

Does the right hon. Member share my dismay that, despite a Government majority of over 170 and the fact that there are over 400 Government MPs, on an issue of national security only one Government Back Bencher spoke in this debate? Does he think that is an indication of how...

Member
Paul Holmes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 October 2025
Reference
773 c1298
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister give way?

Member
Paul Holmes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 October 2025
Reference
773 c731
House
House of Commons

Reports today suggest that China and India are entering into negotiations to sign leases to islands surrounding those on which British military operations will continue under the proposed lease agreement. Does she think that connection to China would be a risk and pose a threat to national security?

Member
Paul Holmes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 October 2025
Reference
773 c686
House
House of Commons

I associate myself with the Minister’s words about 9/11 and the untimely and tragic death of Charlie Kirk.

Yesterday, it was reported that in 2008 Lord Mandelson emailed Epstein and said that his conviction in the United States

“could not happen in Britain”,

and encouraged him to go for early release. The whole...

Member
Paul Holmes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 September 2025
Reference
772 c1048
House
House of Commons

On a point of order, Mr Speaker. This relates to the issue we have been discussing, but is about the House procedures. What I took from the Minister’s answer was that Lord Mandelson, a Member of the House of Lords, had not given a full account of his past actions...

Member
Paul Holmes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 September 2025
Reference
772 c1049
House
House of Commons