Skip to main content

1-17 of 17 results for legtitle:"National Security Bill 2022-23"

Member X
Lord Anderson of Ipswich

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Anderson of Ipswich, Lord (17)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, we on these Benches are often critical of the Government—of either colour, I understand—so it is perhaps appropriate to record my appreciation, at least, to the Minister and indeed to the Security Minister, for the patience with which they listened to us, but also for the imagination with...

Member
Lord Anderson of Ipswich (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2023
Reference
828 c1091
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I declare my connection with the Government of Cyprus, as detailed in the register, and, like my noble friend Lord Carlile, I have spoken to the High Commissioner about this. Clause 97, as the noble Lord, Lord Carlile, has said, is a sufficient and constitutionally appropriate way to...

Member
Lord Anderson of Ipswich (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2023
Reference
828 cc285-6
House
House of Lords

The Minister has given us an explanation and I accept that the reference to a constable is to a United Kingdom constable, but Clause 6 gives the constable the power to clear people out of prohibited places. Why is it necessary for United Kingdom law to apply? Why is it...

Member
Lord Anderson of Ipswich (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2023
Reference
828 c289
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak to Amendment 68 on the supplementary sheet in my name and that of the noble Lord, Lord Carlile. The immunity that preceded this Clause 30 may have been doomed from the moment the noble Baroness, Lady Manningham-Buller, began her speech in Committee by saying that

“it...

Member
Lord Anderson of Ipswich (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2023
Reference
828 cc309-314
House
House of Lords

As a point of correction, the omission has been remedied and the amendment is on the supplementary sheet.

Member
Lord Anderson of Ipswich (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2023
Reference
828 c320
House
House of Lords

The Minister has been helpful, but I hope he can be more specific. When does he think the encouragement or assistance of an overseas crime, conduct which is penalised by the Serious Crime Act 2007, might be necessary for the proper exercise of a function of the Armed Forces, other...

Member
Lord Anderson of Ipswich (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2023
Reference
828 c322
House
House of Lords

Tabled by

Lord Anderson of Ipswich

68: In inserted section 50A(2)(b), leave out “a” and insert “an intelligence-related”

Member's explanatory statement

This amendment would restrict the application to the armed forces of the new defence to charges under Part 2 of the Serious Crime Act by limiting it to the exercise of intelligence-related functions.

Member
Lord Anderson of Ipswich (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2023
Reference
828 c325
House
House of Lords

Given the Minister’s undertaking, I shall not move the amendment.

Member
Lord Anderson of Ipswich (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2023
Reference
828 c325
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord, Lord Purvis, hits on a sore point for independent reviewers past and present. At the instigation of my noble friend Lord Carlile, the Australians copied the job of independent reviewer—I think they call him or her the independent national security legislation monitor, which is even more indigestible....

Member
Lord Anderson of Ipswich (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2023
Reference
828 c339
House
House of Lords

The Minister rightly emphasises the very high degree of discretion that is given to judges under Clause 83. The core of it is Clause 83(5), which allows a judge to take a view on whether it is “appropriate” for the amount of damages to be reduced. I wonder what the...

Member
Lord Anderson of Ipswich (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2023
Reference
826 c1857
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have very little to add to the powerful speeches the Committee has already heard, but, as a supplement to what the

noble Lord, Lord Pannick, has just said, I will remind the Minister of two other facts.

First, terrorist offences are by no means all at the top...

Member
Lord Anderson of Ipswich (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2023
Reference
826 cc1867-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my Amendment 81 is a bit wider than that of the noble Baroness, Lady Ludford, who is certainly a heavyweight in my book. I agree with what she has had to say about that.

Post-legislative scrutiny can take many forms, but where powers are exercised on the basis of...

Member
Lord Anderson of Ipswich (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2023
Reference
826 cc1643-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, while I very much welcome the fact that this policy is under review, I hope your Lordships will agree, in view of the great interest that has been expressed in this subject

outside this place, that we take the opportunity to express, at least in summary, the very...

Member
Lord Anderson of Ipswich (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2023
Reference
826 cc1649-1651
House
House of Lords

I am very grateful to the Minister. He has just mentioned for the second time the compliance burden. Earlier on, he said very reassuringly that all that would be required to register was the completion of a form. But does the Minister understand that one reason why so many people...

Member
Lord Anderson of Ipswich (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2023
Reference
826 c1673
House
House of Lords

My Lords, that sounds right to me. Part 2 of the Serious Crime Act 2007 abolished the common-law offence of incitement and substituted three specific offences of encouraging and assisting serious crime. Schedule 4 expands the reach of Part 2 to the encouragement and assistance

of crimes which are committed,...

Member
Lord Anderson of Ipswich (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 January 2023
Reference
826 cc1443-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a pleasure to follow two such clear and thought-provoking speeches. When this House has debated treason offences in recent years, it has generally been in the context of lending support to terrorist groups, particularly in foreign theatres such as Iraq and Syria. It has never seemed...

Member
Lord Anderson of Ipswich (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 December 2022
Reference
826 cc1146-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I apologise for not being present at Second Reading. I cannot even claim, like the noble Lord, Lord Purvis of Tweed, that I was broadcasting the benefits of line-by-line scrutiny to a foreign power. I was performing a long-arranged judicial function in the Channel Islands.

I am well disposed...

Member
Lord Anderson of Ipswich (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 December 2022
Reference
826 cc976-7
House
House of Lords