Skip to main content

1-20 of 28 results for subject:Defence

Member X
Luke Pollard
Subject X
Peers' interests

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Peers' interests (28)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

As I said in my first answer, Peter Mandelson had no influence on the decision to award this contract; it was a decision made by the Secretary of State, and it was his decision alone.

As the shadow Secretary of State well knows, this enterprise agreement builds on the one that...

Member
Luke Pollard (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2026
Reference
780 c692
House
House of Commons

Urgent question on the Ministry of Defence's contracts with Palantir.

Lead member
James Cartlidge
Answering member
Luke Pollard
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Urgent questions
Date
10 February 2026
Reference
780 cc691-702
House
House of Commons

The Palantir enterprise agreement was a direct award, justified under the Procurement Act 2023. The agreement covers existing services and areas in which there is a robust technical justification for using Palantir products and services for defence outcomes. All procurement procedures were followed, and a transparency notice was published.

Member
Luke Pollard (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2026
Reference
780 c693
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman will have heard the answer I just gave to the Chair of the Defence Committee about the procurement process. As I set out, the decision was made by the Secretary of State alone; he has been clear about that. The hon. Gentleman will know that the UK...

Member
Luke Pollard (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2026
Reference
780 c693
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is right that investigations are under way. As the Government made clear to the House last week, we will co-operate fully with those investigations, and we will ensure that the information that the House requires to be published is published in a way that creates the transparency...

Member
Luke Pollard (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2026
Reference
780 c694
House
House of Commons

I have answered those questions. I say politely to the Father of the House that the partygate scandal, which is not the subject of today’s urgent question, is not a trivial scandal, and it is important to put that clearly on the record. It undermined confidence in the Government at...

Member
Luke Pollard (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2026
Reference
780 c694
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend asks valid questions. I say to him clearly that this Government will stand by and honour the agreement on the publication of information that was struck last week during the debate on the Humble Address. If there are documents from the Ministry of Defence that need to...

Member
Luke Pollard (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2026
Reference
780 c695
House
House of Commons

Peter Mandelson has let us all down in this House. The question about the minutes is being looked at by Downing Street, and it will be for Downing Street officials to publish more in due course.

Member
Luke Pollard (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2026
Reference
780 c695
House
House of Commons

We take vendor lock-in very seriously. We will build a more comprehensive AI framework in the Ministry of Defence; we will be using AI more frequently in more aspects of defence, just as the wider economy is doing. We want to ensure that our data sovereign. Our contract with Palantir...

Member
Luke Pollard (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2026
Reference
780 c695
House
House of Commons

We signed a contract with a supplier to provide a service for which there is clear military need and clear utility, in order to strengthen our armed forces. We keep all contracts, not just those with Palantir, under constant review to ensure that they are delivering what they were signed...

Member
Luke Pollard (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2026
Reference
780 c696
House
House of Commons

I appreciate my hon. Friend’s passion on this matter but, as I have set out to the House, we will continue to maintain a close defence and security relationship with the United States—it is in our national security interests to do so. In signing any agreement with a US company,...

Member
Luke Pollard (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2026
Reference
780 c696
House
House of Commons

As I said in reply to the right hon. Member for New Forest East (Sir Julian Lewis), that is a matter for Downing Street to publish in due course. I am afraid that I have spent the last three days in Saudia Arabia, so I am just catching up on...

Member
Luke Pollard (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2026
Reference
780 c696
House
House of Commons

I appreciate my hon. Friend’s direction of travel and passion. We followed due process, in accordance with the Procurement Act, in awarding those contracts. As I have clearly set out, we will comply with the agreement made last week on publication of data and documents.

Member
Luke Pollard (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2026
Reference
780 c697
House
House of Commons

As I have been clear to the House in a number of answers, we will continue to have a security and defence relationship with the United States, and it is in our national interests to do so. We are a party that takes defence and security very seriously, which is...

Member
Luke Pollard (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2026
Reference
780 c697
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is absolutely right that we should look at security, data security and the opportunities here. In the strategic defence review, we set out our direction of travel in defence, and investing in new technologies, including artificial intelligence, is key to securing our national security. I want to...

Member
Luke Pollard (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2026
Reference
780 c697
House
House of Commons

I am afraid that looking for deliverables ahead of a state visit is pretty standard practice, and it is something that the right hon. Gentleman’s Government looked at just as much as we do. We will continue to have conversations with our ambassadors in all circumstances, as he would expect....

Member
Luke Pollard (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2026
Reference
780 c698
House
House of Commons

I entirely appreciate my hon. Friend’s position. Palantir provides services to the United Kingdom that keep our troops safe and enhance our national security. We have a range of contracts with US firms in procuring not only services but platforms. All those contracts go through the necessary rigour and assessment...

Member
Luke Pollard (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2026
Reference
780 c698
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady’s position would be stronger if the Greens were not so soft on defence. We will continue to invest in our national security, and we will invest in the contracts that keep our troops and our country safe. That will involve investing not only in UK firms, but...

Member
Luke Pollard (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2026
Reference
780 c699
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman will have seen the photographs that appeared on No. 10’s Twitter feed, to which I referred in response to the earlier question about the publication of information. He will also recall—perhaps from his time as a Defence Minister—that in 2021 the then Defence Secretary, Ben Wallace,...

Member
Luke Pollard (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2026
Reference
780 c699
House
House of Commons

I appreciate the right hon. Gentleman’s long-standing position on a number of the items he asks about. I have been clear to the House today that we will continue to work with our US friends—they are our closest defence and security partner. Where appropriate, we will look at working with...

Member
Luke Pollard (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2026
Reference
780 c699
House
House of Commons