Skip to main content

1-15 of 15 results for subject:Injunctions

Member X
Lord Paddick

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Paddick, Lord (15)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Is the noble Lord also aware that one of the amendments tabled by the noble Baroness, Lady Sugg, addresses exactly this issue, making somebody voluntarily accompanying a person to a clinic exempt from this clause?

Member
Lord Paddick (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2022
Reference
825 c1316
House
House of Lords

We on these Benches accept that many people have strong views both on abortion and on this clause, on both sides of the argument, as reflected in our debate. I want to say two things at the outset. First, my understanding is that organisations that provide abortion services, such as...

Member
Lord Paddick (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2022
Reference
825 cc1325-7
House
House of Lords

My noble friend’s amendment is a probing amendment for the House to consider what sort of premises might be included in buffer zones to ensure that places where women go to get advice are included. The noble Baroness makes an important point, but this is a probing amendment so that...

Member
Lord Paddick (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2022
Reference
825 cc1327-8
House
House of Lords

No pressure.

Member
Lord Paddick (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2022
Reference
825 c1330
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I intend to oppose the question that Clauses 10 and 11 stand part of the Bill, and I shall speak to the other amendments in this group. It is not particularly helpful to have a clause stand part notice beginning a group rather than an amendment, but there...

Member
Lord Paddick (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2022
Reference
825 cc1333-5
House
House of Lords

Before the Minister responds, he may also wish to think very carefully about what he said about these powers not being exercisable by officers in plain clothes. I am prepared to apologise to the Committee for misleading it when I say that these powers alter Section 1 of PACE, which...

Member
Lord Paddick (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2022
Reference
825 c1344
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords who have participated in this debate. The noble Baroness, Lady Jones of Moulsecoomb, questioned the area in which suspicionless stop and search could be operated. Marches that occur in central London traditionally start at Marble Arch, go down Park Lane and sometimes through...

Member
Lord Paddick (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2022
Reference
825 cc1345-6
House
House of Lords

Can the Minister clarify whether these powers—not Section 60 powers—to stop and search people in relation to protests can be exercised by officers in plain clothes?

Member
Lord Paddick (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2022
Reference
825 c1346
House
House of Lords

Can the Minister point to the part of the Bill that says that suspicionless stop and search powers are restricted to officers in uniform?

Member
Lord Paddick (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2022
Reference
825 c1346
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support the comments of my noble friend. The only observation I was going to make about the powers being given to the British Transport Police is that it is primarily funded by the rail industry and whoever pays the piper calls the tune. Can the Minister confirm...

Member
Lord Paddick (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2022
Reference
825 c1349
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Paddick

110: Clause 17, page 19, line 26, leave out “reasonably believes” and insert “has reasonable grounds for suspecting”

Member's explanatory statement

This amendment is intended to raise the threshold for the Secretary of State to bring civil proceedings.

Member
Lord Paddick (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2022
Reference
825 c1353
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in moving Amendment 110 in my name, I will speak also to my Amendments 111 to 113 and 116 and the other amendments in this group. These amendments are about a power to be given to the Secretary of State to bring civil proceedings to curtail or prevent...

Member
Lord Paddick (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2022
Reference
825 cc1353-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords for their contributions to this debate. If I can try and get the sense of the House, we on this side feel that this is constitutionally dubious, potentially providing opportunities for corruption, and that it is a very serious step to allow the...

Member
Lord Paddick (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2022
Reference
825 c1360
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I remind the House of my experience in public order policing: I was an advanced trained public order senior officer attending specialist pass-fail week-long initial training, table-top exercises over numerous weekends, and two-day practical exercises every six months involving more than 100 officers and petrol-bombing and operating under...

Member
Lord Paddick (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 November 2022
Reference
825 cc145-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, why do companies need injunctions? If the protest is lawful, the police should facilitate it. If it is illegal, the police should take action against those involved. Is current legislation inadequate, or are there insufficient police resources?

Asked by
Lord Paddick (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
9 April 2019
Reference
797 c451
House
House of Lords