Skip to main content

1-14 of 14 results for subject:Finance

Member X
Stephen Twigg
Subject X
Local government

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Local government (14)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I am encouraged by what the Minister has just said. My constituent, Laurence Clark, received support from the ILF. Liverpool City Council has picked up that support, so he knows he has it until the spring of next year. He has asked me to raise his concern about what would...

Member
Stephen Twigg (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2015
Reference
598 c148WH
House
House of Commons

The Select Committee Chair says that new clause 2 would not extend selection, but it would involve its extension within the state system. Does he not acknowledge that a number of independent schools, including Belvedere school in Liverpool, have entered the state system and been willing and happy as a...

Member
Stephen Twigg (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 May 2011
Reference
527 c1216-7
House
House of Commons

Is my right hon. Friend aware that some schools, including some in my constituency, have already moved existing year 10 pupils—generally the more able ones—off the subjects that they have chosen and on to the English baccalaureate subjects, because they are worried about the new accountability measure?

Member
Stephen Twigg (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 May 2011
Reference
527 c1214
House
House of Commons

The priorities for BSF were set according to social and economic deprivation and educational underachievement. Is the Secretary of State really saying that those are the wrong priorities when deciding what educational investment should be? Liverpool schools have been hit hard by last year's announcement. A month ago, I wrote...

Member
Stephen Twigg (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 February 2011
Reference
523 c708-9
House
House of Commons

As my right hon. Friend the Member for Blackburn (Mr Straw) said, under-registration disproportionately hits the poorest, the youngest, the most mobile and ethnic minorities in our communities. I welcome the data-matching pilots, but surely it cannot make sense to go ahead with a radical redrawing of parliamentary boundaries before...

Member
Stephen Twigg (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 September 2010
Reference
515 c891-2
House
House of Commons

I am being tempted to take a lot of interventions, but I understand that Members of all parties may want an early vote because they need to be somewhere else a little later this afternoon. I will give way to the hon. Gentleman, but this will be the final intervention...

Member
Stephen Twigg (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2010
Reference
514 c617
House
House of Commons

That is absolutely my understanding, and the figures that the Department for Children, Schools and Families gave under the previous Government were those signed off by the Treasury.

Member
Stephen Twigg (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2010
Reference
514 c617
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman ought to see that the answer to his question has been given in the debate. The Government are already indicating that there will be extra money for free schools. They could have said, ““We don't think Building Schools for the Future can be afforded, so we're going...

Member
Stephen Twigg (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2010
Reference
514 c617-8
House
House of Commons

I strongly echo the closing remarks of the hon. Member for Portsmouth South (Mr Hancock), and I welcome the amendment. The Government's announcements on Building Schools for the Future and the progress of this Bill, which have happened roughly at the same time, are very much related to each other....

Member
Stephen Twigg (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2010
Reference
514 c616
House
House of Commons

The difference on this occasion is that the schools affected have worked for years on a programme for their own improvement, and they came together in Building Schools for the Future. Now that has all been stopped, except for schools that will potentially have academy status. The problem is the...

Member
Stephen Twigg (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2010
Reference
514 c617
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady is making a good case, but I struggle to understand why schools should have to apply for those freedoms. Why cannot the Bill simply give them to all schools?

Member
Stephen Twigg (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2010
Reference
514 c401
House
House of Commons

On a related point, I am unclear as to what the process will be for schools becoming academies under the new scheme. Say, for example, that 500 schools apply. The impact assessment seems to suggest that just 200 a year will be successful. On what basis will Ministers decide which...

Member
Stephen Twigg (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2010
Reference
514 c401
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills, what steps he is taking to reduce the number of school playing field sales. - Includes figures.

Asked by
Andy Reed (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answering body
Department for Education and Skills
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
4 June 2003
Reference
114690; 406 c427W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills, what are the (a) current and (b) potential future funding opportunities for local authorities to offer home to school transport for those currently not entitled to free transport under the Education Act 1996. - Inc figures.

Asked by
Lord Foster of Bath (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Education and Skills
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
23 October 2002
Reference
75599; 391 c375-6W;391 c373W
House
House of Commons