Skip to main content

1-20 of 21 results for subject:Defence

Member X
Lord Tunnicliffe
Session X
2017-19

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Tunnicliffe, Lord (21)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I welcome the noble Lord, Lord Duncan of Springbank, to his role—I am not sure how long he is going to occupy it. I join in his remarks about the noble Lord, Lord Young of Cookham, who filled the role for some months in an entertaining and very...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 September 2019
Reference
799 cc1441-3
House
House of Lords

The Opposition, as far as I know, have not said that they do not welcome an end to austerity. They just have a very different vision of what it looks like.

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 September 2019
Reference
799 c1463
House
House of Lords

My Lords, yesterday the Defence Select Committee report found that MoD expenditure has been cut by an eye-watering 25% since 2010. The former US Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Affairs said that during this time there has been,

“a steady decline of Britain as the partner of first choice for the US military”.

Does the Minister accept that austerity has undermined the UK/US defence partnership and that ultimately you cannot do security on the cheap?

Asked by
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
17 July 2019
Reference
799 c235
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I wonder whether we could build on that point, as I am a little confused. In the good old days, when a Secretary of State made a speech, one had reasonable assurance that he was speaking the policy of the Government. That is not so clear at the moment. Have the various statements by the Foreign Secretary been more in his role as a candidate for Prime Minister than as a representative of the Government?

Asked by
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
11 June 2019
Reference
798 c351
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I welcome the useful report by the European Union Committee on the common security and defence policy. I thank the noble Lord, Lord Horam, for introducing the report and am grateful for the contributions of other noble Lords.

The CSDP dates back to 1948, when five countries, including the...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 May 2019
Reference
797 cc1613-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Earl, Lord Howe, for introducing this debate and the many noble Lords who have participated in it. It has been wide-ranging, and it is therefore inevitable I will repeat some points.

I am honoured to take part in today’s debate on the 70th anniversary of...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 April 2019
Reference
797 cc153-5
House
House of Lords

Lords motion to take note of the seventieth anniversary of the founding of NATO and its continuing role in the United Kingdom's defence and security. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Earl Howe
Answering member
Lord Tunnicliffe
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Debates
Date
2 April 2019
Reference
797 cc120-162
House
House of Lords

Lords motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Earl Howe
Answering member
Lord Tunnicliffe
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
4 February 2019
Reference
795 cc340-8GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord for introducing this statutory instrument. On the other hand, that is not really true: the facts of life are that I would rather not spend my weekend studying SIs for a scenario that is deeply absurd and the Government should have ruled out...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2019
Reference
795 c344GC
House
House of Lords

I feel that I have lost my place. Is the Minister saying that non-derogated invitations to tender will be restricted to the UK suppliers and Gibraltar, or will they be available to worldwide competition, with certain exceptions?

4.45 pm

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2019
Reference
795 cc345-6GC
House
House of Lords

I am sorry to ask the same question over and again, but it is important: putting the derogated areas covered presently by Article 346 to one side, do the regulations—noble Lords must realise that I cannot read them; it took all my time to read the Explanatory Memorandum and try...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2019
Reference
795 c346GC
House
House of Lords

The noble Earl says there will be no changes. I understand that at the moment, in non-derogated areas, EU suppliers have a right to bid and we have an obligation to take their bids seriously. I think that under the new situation they do not have this right and that...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2019
Reference
795 c347GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for repeating the Statement. When I first read it, I thought it was the sort of statement Pepys might have made—and probably with better reason. It is essentially a classic “We will try harder” statement. Let me illustrate. I was reading through it and...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 December 2018
Reference
794 cc1771-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for introducing this debate and the noble Lord, Lord Howell, for introducing his report. The noble Lord, Lord King, made an interesting point when he said that this debate had an urgency and concern unusual in our defence debates.

The Labour Party is very proud...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 June 2018
Reference
792 cc150-2
House
House of Lords

Lords motion to take note of the forthcoming NATO Summit. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Baroness Goldie
Answering member
Lord Tunnicliffe
Department
Ministry of Defence; Select Committee on International Relations
Type
Debates; Debates on select committee reports
Notes
Debated with Lords motion to take note of the third report of the International Relations Committee on The NATO Summit 2018 (HL 143).
Date
26 June 2018
Reference
792 cc108-158
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will reflect briefly on the fact that we have had a Question from my noble friend Lord West that did not ask for more ships. At the recent RUSI conference, my honourable friend, Nia Griffith, said:

“Look at what Labour has committed to, and what you would consider...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 June 2018
Reference
792 c106
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for repeating the Statement, and perhaps I may be the first to congratulate him on his birthday. That is the charming bit over.

We welcome the decision to separate out the modernising defence programme from the national security capability review. That, frankly, is not much...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 January 2018
Reference
788 cc1281-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, does this not show the chaos in the whole area of defence? The annual report on SDSR 2015 was due by the end of December. This has somehow been subsumed into the NSCR, a date for which we have not got. Will this review set out the threats...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 January 2018
Reference
788 c839
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Question put by the noble Lord, Lord Sterling, is: should we have a full SDSR? It seems to me that the response to that depends on the effectiveness of the present process, which we were told about on 15 January. The affirmation then was that the threat...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2018
Reference
788 c28GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for repeating the Statement. I may regret this but I am almost tempted to welcome it—however, I had better be careful to understand it first. It seems to say that this review will define the threats. I think its implication is that the Ministry...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2018
Reference
788 c460
House
House of Lords