Skip to main content

1-20 of 21 results for subject:USA

Member X
Emily Thornberry
Subject X
Intelligence services

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Thornberry, Emily (21)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Intelligence services (21)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for International Trade, with reference to her Department's monthly transparency publications on expenditure over £25,000, where the following payments made to Linklaters LLP are recorded, as set out in Linklaters' filings under the United States Foreign Agents Registration Act: (a) $294,935.44 on 6 July...

Asked by
Emily Thornberry (Labour)
Answering body
Department for International Trade
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 January 2021
Reference
142838
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, whether UK intelligence shares the conclusion of the US Central Intelligence Agency that the recent murder of Jamal Khashoggi was carried out on the orders of Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman of Saudi Arabia; and if he will make...

Asked by
Emily Thornberry (Labour)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 November 2018
Reference
194090
House
House of Commons

If this is the Foreign Secretary’s last appearance at the Dispatch Box in his current role, he has made a typically serious and thoughtful speech for his farewell. It behoves all of us to reflect seriously and thoughtfully on the Chilcot report, and the Labour party has a duty to...

Member
Emily Thornberry (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2016
Reference
613 cc326-7
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the right hon. Gentleman for that, because it is important to emphasise that there further lessons need to be learned, some of which I hope to address. I will not spend time repeating any of Chilcot’s factual findings, because, looking to the future, we need to...

Member
Emily Thornberry (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2016
Reference
613 c327
House
House of Commons

That is a serious point, and I hope that Members will consider it. The question is whether the House was deliberately misled. Chilcot concluded that, although the intelligence may have been flawed and the House misled, it was not deliberately misled. Therefore, in my opinion, if the House tried to...

Member
Emily Thornberry (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2016
Reference
613 c327
House
House of Commons

I always get very worried when I agree so thoroughly with the right hon. and learned Gentleman, but I find it happening on many occasions. [Interruption.] I hear from a sedentary position, “You lawyers are all the same”, but we do agree on certain principles. Frankly, our concern is sometimes...

Member
Emily Thornberry (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2016
Reference
613 c328
House
House of Commons

Chilcot considered those notes and statements over a long period. Sir John Chilcot is a man of great standing, and the report is very thoughtful, and I will not gainsay what he says. There are plenty of lessons to learn from the report, and in my view they go much...

Member
Emily Thornberry (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2016
Reference
613 c328
House
House of Commons

No. What I am saying is that there are standards that we have always upheld. For example, I believe Warren Hastings was tried by this House 200 years ago, but he was tried by judges, he was represented and he was given an opportunity to say what he had to...

Member
Emily Thornberry (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2016
Reference
613 c328
House
House of Commons

I appreciate that there is speculation about what may or may not happen to the former Prime Minister. That is not within my brief today, speaking as the shadow Foreign Secretary and attempting to draw the lessons from Chilcot. It is important that I address

that this afternoon and leave...

Member
Emily Thornberry (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2016
Reference
613 cc328-330
House
House of Commons

I spent only six months in the area of defence, but although I spent a great deal of time immersing myself in it, I am not just relying on my own views in saying what a disaster the coalition’s first so-called strategic defence review was. It is not just me...

Member
Emily Thornberry (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2016
Reference
613 c330
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman has had his opportunity to put his views on the record, and I am sure that he will speak later. My view is that if things had been fixed in the way that the Foreign Secretary has stated, we would not be swinging backwards and forwards...

Member
Emily Thornberry (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2016
Reference
613 c330
House
House of Commons

We are moving a long way from the lessons that need to be drawn from Chilcot, and if I may, I will return to my speech. The hon. Gentleman and I have discussed defence on many occasions. I always enjoy the discussions, and I am quite happy to take his...

Member
Emily Thornberry (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2016
Reference
613 cc330-1
House
House of Commons

There is continuing debate about the matter. As long as we can be confident that a decision made in this House will not need to be taken off to the courts, for the judges, eventually, to decide whether we go to war—that would be entirely inappropriate—and as long as we...

Member
Emily Thornberry (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2016
Reference
613 cc331-2
House
House of Commons

It is important that we look to tomorrow’s problems. Special forces are likely to be used increasingly. On the idea that we will send, for example, special forces into Libya in a training capacity, I agree with the hon. Gentleman about how that might end up a quasi-combat role. Presumably,...

Member
Emily Thornberry (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2016
Reference
613 c332
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the Foreign Secretary for making that point. I do not expect special forces, before they are used, to have to go before a Committee of Parliament and get permission, but I do think that there should be some form of accountability and some explanation. It was...

Member
Emily Thornberry (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2016
Reference
613 cc332-3
House
House of Commons

I am sure that some American generals were disappointed that Harold Wilson would not agree to British involvement in Vietnam, but we got over it and our relationship is strong enough to endure differences of opinion. If we are to be good friends, it is important to recognise that good...

Member
Emily Thornberry (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2016
Reference
613 c333
House
House of Commons

I am sorry but the hon. Gentleman has already intervened twice. I am taking a very long time, and I ought to get on with it.

Chilcot says that Tony Blair ignored warnings about the sectarian violence that would sweep Iraq after Saddam fell, and after the appalling loss of life...

Member
Emily Thornberry (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2016
Reference
613 c334
House
House of Commons

It is interesting to hear what the right hon. Gentleman says, but that issue is one of speculation. In my view it is not legal to intervene in a country to topple a regime, and morally we should not intervene in a country unless we have some form of strategy...

Member
Emily Thornberry (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2016
Reference
613 c334
House
House of Commons

I hear what the right hon. and learned Gentleman says, but my point is that, again, information was available and could have informed the intervention. Once the initial intervention had been made, what happened thereafter? How were manifest and obvious dangers protected against? I do not think that those important...

Member
Emily Thornberry (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2016
Reference
613 c335
House
House of Commons

Tempting though it is to debate that issue with the hon. and learned Lady, it is important to note that any Attorney General knows that they are the only person in the Cabinet who can say to the Prime Minister, “No. You can’t do that. It is not legal. You...

Member
Emily Thornberry (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2016
Reference
613 cc335-6
House
House of Commons