1-20 of 20 results for subject:Ofwat
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.156 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.005 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Ofwat
- We searched for
- subject_t:Ofwat OR subject_t:"Director General of Water Services" OR subject_t:"Office for Water Services" OR subject_t:"Office of Water Services" OR subject_t:"Water Services Regulation Authority" OR subject_t:WSRA OR subject_ses:60315
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
Does my hon. Friend also think there should be a requirement on water companies to report that information to their consumers, perhaps in the form of formal consumer committees of each water company, so that that company is more likely to be held to account by the very consumers who...
Does my hon. Friend also think there should be a requirement on water companies to report that information to their consumers, perhaps in the form of formal consumer committees of each water company, so that that company is more likely to be held to account by the very consumers who...
I appreciate the opportunity to speak in this debate. I join others in congratulating my hon. Friend the Member for Gower (Tonia Antoniazzi) on opening the debate. I want to underline in particular the figure that she used: 39 million tonnes of raw sewage was dumped in the River Thames...
I appreciate the opportunity to speak in this debate. I join others in congratulating my hon. Friend the Member for Gower (Tonia Antoniazzi) on opening the debate. I want to underline in particular the figure that she used: 39 million tonnes of raw sewage was dumped in the River Thames...
The right hon. Gentleman will have to forgive me. I was concentrating on other things in the 10 years before privatisation—I am not quite that old.
If he shares the Opposition’s concerns about the quality of performance of the privatised water companies, I welcome that.
I recognise that the Minister is...
The right hon. Gentleman will have to forgive me. I was concentrating on other things in the 10 years before privatisation—I am not quite that old.
If he shares the Opposition’s concerns about the quality of performance of the privatised water companies, I welcome that.
I recognise that the Minister is...
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what discussions he has had with OFWAT on reducing ammonium nitrate from fertilisers from entering the water supply.
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what discussions he has had with OFWAT on reducing ammonium nitrate from fertilisers from entering the water supply.
The Secretary of State has not discussed this with Ofwat. The Drinking Water Inspectorate is the regulator for drinking water quality in England and the Environment Agency monitors drinking water protected areas. Drinking water quality in England is very high. In 2018 99.95% of water supplies complied with our drinking water quality regulations, which include standards for ammonium and nitrate. The Government is committed to maintaining these high standards and reducing fertilisers entering the water supply through regulations, incentives and advice to farmers.
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, if he will direct (a) the Drinking Water Inspectorate and (b) Ofwat to monitor levels of asbestos in water; and if he will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, if he will direct (a) the Drinking Water Inspectorate and (b) Ofwat to monitor levels of asbestos in water; and if he will make a statement.
Water companies are required to risk assess their supplies from source to tap and rectify any issues if there is a risk to human health. The World Health Organization have assessed that there is no consistent evidence of impact on human health from ingesting asbestos through drinking water, therefore levels of asbestos in water are not monitored.
I beg to move,
That this House has considered the future of the water industry in England and Wales.
Customers and employees should be helped to take back control of the companies providing our water and taking away our sewage. The people of England should once again be front and centre of...
I beg to move,
That this House has considered the future of the water industry in England and Wales.
Customers and employees should be helped to take back control of the companies providing our water and taking away our sewage. The people of England should once again be front and centre of...
My hon. Friend and the trade union movement in general have pointed that out on a number of occasions. I will come on to one of the trade union movement’s particular campaign issues.
Water companies have become a desirable global financial commodity, bought and sold by big banks, international infrastructure investors,...
My hon. Friend and the trade union movement in general have pointed that out on a number of occasions. I will come on to one of the trade union movement’s particular campaign issues.
Water companies have become a desirable global financial commodity, bought and sold by big banks, international infrastructure investors,...
My hon. Friend makes a good point. I will come on to how mutuals would allow customers to have a lot more say over—indeed, they would give them ownership of—the water services on which we all depend.
Turning to one specific company, Thames Water was owned for 11 years by a...
My hon. Friend makes a good point. I will come on to how mutuals would allow customers to have a lot more say over—indeed, they would give them ownership of—the water services on which we all depend.
Turning to one specific company, Thames Water was owned for 11 years by a...
I am enjoying the trip to Venezuela that the right hon. Gentleman is taking us on. May I draw him back to my remarks about the mutual model
of democratic public ownership, which would see the water companies remaining in the private sector, albeit run by their customers and employees,...
I am enjoying the trip to Venezuela that the right hon. Gentleman is taking us on. May I draw him back to my remarks about the mutual model
of democratic public ownership, which would see the water companies remaining in the private sector, albeit run by their customers and employees,...
I wonder whether the right hon. Gentleman would comment on two things. The first is the National Audit Office’s calculations, which suggest that there has been a 43% increase in real terms in water bills since privatisation, and the second is the significant difference in water prices between publicly owned...
I wonder whether the right hon. Gentleman would comment on two things. The first is the National Audit Office’s calculations, which suggest that there has been a 43% increase in real terms in water bills since privatisation, and the second is the significant difference in water prices between publicly owned...
A £5 note is on its way.
A £5 note is on its way.
Far be it from me to help the Scottish National party out, but as I understand it, from analysis done by Greenwich University, the levels of leakage per kilometre in Scotland are better than for many English water companies, and are certainly in line with the average at worst.
Far be it from me to help the Scottish National party out, but as I understand it, from analysis done by Greenwich University, the levels of leakage per kilometre in Scotland are better than for many English water companies, and are certainly in line with the average at worst.
Will the Minister comment on two points? I mentioned in an earlier intervention that, since Scottish Water was set up in its current form, the price of water is 2% lower in real terms, while water bills in England have gone up by an average of 13% in real terms....
Will the Minister comment on two points? I mentioned in an earlier intervention that, since Scottish Water was set up in its current form, the price of water is 2% lower in real terms, while water bills in England have gone up by an average of 13% in real terms....
I am grateful to the Backbench Business Committee, to you, Mr Gray, for chairing the debate, and to my hon. Friends and other hon. Members for taking the time to take part. I think the mutual route to democratic public ownership offers significant advantages over the current privatised system. Customers...
I am grateful to the Backbench Business Committee, to you, Mr Gray, for chairing the debate, and to my hon. Friends and other hon. Members for taking the time to take part. I think the mutual route to democratic public ownership offers significant advantages over the current privatised system. Customers...
Motion that this House has considered the future of the water industry in England and Wales. Agreed to on question.
Motion that this House has considered the future of the water industry in England and Wales. Agreed to on question.
The hon. Gentleman makes an extremely good point. Given that we are in the middle of the latest pricing review, if Ministers had the gumption they could put pressure on Ofwat to use its existing powers to bear down on those exact issues. I agree with the hon. Gentleman’s general...
The hon. Gentleman makes an extremely good point. Given that we are in the middle of the latest pricing review, if Ministers had the gumption they could put pressure on Ofwat to use its existing powers to bear down on those exact issues. I agree with the hon. Gentleman’s general...
I find myself in the slightly unusual position of agreeing almost completely with the hon. Lady. Leakage is a huge problem. Much tougher regulation by Ofwat in particular, and ultimately an increase in the regulator’s powers, are required to bear down on
the shocking levels of leakage, not least because...
I find myself in the slightly unusual position of agreeing almost completely with the hon. Lady. Leakage is a huge problem. Much tougher regulation by Ofwat in particular, and ultimately an increase in the regulator’s powers, are required to bear down on
the shocking levels of leakage, not least because...
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, how many investigations Ofwat has undertaken into each water company in England and Wales in each of the last 10 years; and how many of those investigations resulted in a water company receiving a financial penalty.
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, how many investigations Ofwat has undertaken into each water company in England and Wales in each of the last 10 years; and how many of those investigations resulted in a water company receiving a financial penalty.
Ofwat has undertaken eleven enforcement investigations since 2008, and imposed a total of £65.8 million in financial penalties, for issues including leakage and poor customer service. In some cases, Ofwat has also negotiated a total of £192 million in compensation for customers through bill reductions, and £92 million in donations to charities and community projects.
Company | Year | Financial penalty / compensation to customers or donations to charities |
Thames Water | 2018 |
|
Thames Water | 2014 |
|
Southern Water | 2011 |
|
Veolia Water | 2008 |
|
Veolia Water | 2008 |
|
Severn Trent Water | 2008 |
|
Severn Trent Water | 2008 |
|
Thames Water | 2008 |
|
Southern Water | 2008 |
|
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs whether (a) Ministers and (b) officials in her Department have discussed levels of water pressure in each region with (i) OFWAT and (ii) water companies since May 2010; and whether she plans to do so in the next...
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs whether (a) Ministers and (b) officials in her Department have discussed levels of water pressure in each region with (i) OFWAT and (ii) water companies since May 2010; and whether she plans to do so in the next...
Ofwat is the Economic Regulator of Water and Sewerage companies in England and Wales. Since privatisation in 1989, £98 billion has been spent on securing the infrastructure of the overall network, which, among other improvements, has led to a reduction in the number of water pressure incidents and about 338,000 fewer customers being at risk of lower pressure.
Water companies monitor the number of properties at risk of low pressure against an indicator known as DG2. The DG2 measure is 10 metres head of pressure, at the external stop tap, at a flow of nine litres per minute.
In both 2010 and 2011 the companies reported the number of properties at risk of low pressure issues in their areas to Ofwat. Properties at risk of low pressure in 2010-11 would have been part of the information published by companies in June 2011. There were less than 3,000 properties at risk of low pressure in England and Wales.
Information on properties identified at risk of low pressure in England and Wales by company area in 2009-10 and 2010-11 is available on each company's website.
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what plans there are to change the Office of Water Services departmental expenditure limit and administration costs limit for 2001-02. - Inc table.
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what plans there are to change the Office of Water Services departmental expenditure limit and administration costs limit for 2001-02. - Inc table.