Skip to main content

1-11 of 11 results for subject:Wealth

Member X
Graham Stuart

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Stuart, Graham (11)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I am grateful to my hon. Friend.

Member
Graham Stuart (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2012
Reference
543 c424
House
House of Commons

I fear that the hon. Gentleman may be right. As I was saying, there is the supply chain and manufacturers, all of which are UK-based, then there is the sales channel and the deployment of the end product. Where? That is in rural and often coastal areas and areas with...

Member
Graham Stuart (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2012
Reference
543 c424
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman, although properly designated permanent homes will continue to be VAT-free. We are talking about static holiday homes that are not supposed to be a main residence, although there are people in my constituency and elsewhere who are occupying under false pretences, whether misled...

Member
Graham Stuart (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2012
Reference
543 c425
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is quite right. That is why the hon. Member for Ynys Môn (Albert Owen) has a fair point. Some people will be able to afford permanent housing, thereby further pressurising the housing market in areas where such housing is limited. Static caravan parks have been a perfect...

Member
Graham Stuart (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2012
Reference
543 c424
House
House of Commons

In truth, if we were starting with a blank sheet the tax system would look nothing like it does today, but we are not starting with a blank sheet. We have an industry with the characteristics I have described, yet at this of all times we are about to introduce...

Member
Graham Stuart (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2012
Reference
543 c425
House
House of Commons

My right hon. Friend is right. Having secured from the Chancellor an absolute commitment that there will genuinely be consultation, I ask the Government to extend the period and allow us to make the strongest possible case. It will also allow us further to expand the coalition in the House....

Member
Graham Stuart (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2012
Reference
543 c425-6
House
House of Commons

A two-week extension is not a large extension, but it is an extension none the less. However, the Government and the Chancellor must ensure that this is a genuine consultation. Ministers have heard what has been said tonight. They must think again, and reverse their proposal. If they say that...

Member
Graham Stuart (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2012
Reference
543 c442
House
House of Commons

After the concession by the Government, I choose not to move the new clause.

Member
Graham Stuart (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2012
Reference
543 c451
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to my hon. Friend for his intervention, but I am not looking for Ministers to limit that disruption; I am looking for them to remove that disruption altogether. However, he is right to mention the date. We are talking about a major manufacturing business. We are talking...

Member
Graham Stuart (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2012
Reference
543 c423
House
House of Commons

It is my pleasure to follow the other speakers. Like all those who have spoken so far, apart from those on the Front Bench, I shall speak to new clause 6 and the proposal that the Finance Bill should set out that this House will not approve, in a future...

Member
Graham Stuart (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2012
Reference
543 c422-3
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is right. We have heard examples of managing directors of companies being called in by their banks to talk about lending provision because of the threat and uncertainty that this measure brings. It will be extremely disruptive to a fantastic British manufacturing success story. Let me go...

Member
Graham Stuart (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2012
Reference
543 c423
House
House of Commons