1-2 of 2 results for subject:Reviews
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.154 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.003 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Reviews
- We searched for
- subject_t:Reviews OR subject_ses:12492
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
More
Spellar, Lord (2)
Primary member
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Military bases (2)
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, purusant to his Answer of 21st December 2000, Official Report, 360 c253W, which Royal Navy shore establishments are under review with respect to possible amalgmation or closure. - Inc ref to 365 c545-6W and 365 c788W.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, purusant to his Answer of 21st December 2000, Official Report, 360 c253W, which Royal Navy shore establishments are under review with respect to possible amalgmation or closure. - Inc ref to 365 c545-6W and 365 c788W.
Asked by
Iain Duncan Smith
(Conservative)
Answered by
Lord Spellar
(Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
10 April 2001
For answer on
23 April 2001
Answered on
23 April 2001
Mr. Duncan Smith: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence pursuant to his answer of 21 December 2000, Official Report, column
253W, which Royal Navy shore establishments are under review with respect to possible amalgamation or closure. [158526]
Mr. Spellar: A comprehensive review of the utilisation of the Royal Navy's training estate has identified possible efficiencies but
is not yet fully complete and requires further work. This work is being taken forward, in conjunction with proposals for the
rationalisation of specialist training which my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Defence announced in the House as part
of the Defence Training Review on 27 March 2001, Official Report, columns 545-46W, to determine the optimum mix of shore
establishments to meet the training needs of the Royal Navy. It is not possible to confirm which establishments might be affected
until this further work has been completed.
As I announced in a written answer to the hon. Member for Portsmouth, South (Mr. Hancock) on 30 March 2001, Official Report, column
788W, formal consultation is currently under way with the departmental trade unions regarding the proposed streamlining and
re-location to Portsmouth of elements of the Commander in Chief Fleet's Headquarters from Northwood as a result of the Fleet First
study. No decision will be taken on the re-location until the formal consultation process is complete. Comments have been invited
from the unions by 15 May 2001.
Subjects
Navy; Military bases; Training; Reviews; Portsmouth
Date
23 April 2001
Reference
158526; 367 c93-4W
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what changes have been made as a result of the management review of the Clyde Base. - Inc figures.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what changes have been made as a result of the management review of the Clyde Base. - Inc figures.
Asked by
Mike Hancock
(Liberal Democrat)
Answered by
Lord Spellar
(Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
24 November 1999
For answer on
30 November 1999
Answered on
30 November 1999
Mr. Hancock: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what changes have been made as a result of the management review of the Clyde
Base. [100287]
Mr. Spellar: Following a scoping study at the Clyde Base in 1997, Ministers decided to retain work in-house through a joint
Management/Trades Union proposal to establish Neptune Services Direct, which is successfully delivering hotel and related services
increasingly efficiently. In addition, a rationalisation programme was set in hand to optimise the use of resources and skills in
the Engineering and Facilities Support departments.
These changes are still being implemented but, in producing a more effective and efficient organisation, some 161 service and 182
MOD civilian posts have been lost. Through a policy of employing casual staff and fixed term appointees, the civilianisation of some
service posts, and the fact that a number of posts had been held vacant, the changes are being achieved without redundancies.
Subjects
Armed forces; Civilians; Privatisation; Military bases; Reviews; RNAD Coulport
Date
30 November 1999
Reference
340 c82-3W; 100287
House
House of Commons