Skip to main content

1-20 of 28 results for subject:Misuse

Member X
Lord Skelmersdale
Subject X
Disclosure of information

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Skelmersdale, Lord (28)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Disclosure of information (28)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I have been pursuing this matter for almost two years. However, since just before the Summer Recess, I have been extremely careful not to interfere publicly in the deliberations of my noble friend Lord Freud. The Minister has my personal thanks for coming up with a sensible answer...

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 November 2009
Reference
714 c167
House
House of Lords

The noble Baroness has used the word "should" twice. The question is: exactly what happens?

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 June 2009
Reference
711 c489GC
House
House of Lords

No, and I am sure that we will discover from the Minister’s answer to the debate whether that is a job adviser or anyone else within the jobcentre. I rather doubt it, but we will discover, won’t we? The specific matter of propensity raised in these amendments begs the question:...

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 June 2009
Reference
711 c508-9GC
House
House of Lords

It cannot be the Bill team. You should never blame officials. Clause 13 disagreed.

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 June 2009
Reference
711 c540GC
House
House of Lords

Before the noble Baroness does that—oh! or rather before I do so—I had forgotten that we had got ourselves into a slight tangle. I am in a slight tangle because I quite understand that paragraph 5(1) refers to information going to the Secretary of State and to officers of the...

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 June 2009
Reference
711 c533GC
House
House of Lords

The Minister did not continue paragraph 5(3)(b), which I think is what concerns the noble Baroness, Lady Meacher, and is beginning to concern me. It goes on: ""if it is so used, to be supplied to any other person, and used for any purpose, to whom and for which that...

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 June 2009
Reference
711 c531GC
House
House of Lords

The Government are obviously quite right to reduce the duplication in the Bill, but the noble Baroness did not say how this happened. Was it the fault of the Government Whips or was it the fault of the Speaker? It must have been one or the other.

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 June 2009
Reference
711 c540GC
House
House of Lords

As I assume that this is the last amendment of the day—

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 June 2009
Reference
711 c539GC
House
House of Lords

I was only going to say that I am glad that we have not missed our daily ration of the word "conflation".

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 June 2009
Reference
711 c539GC
House
House of Lords

Where do I go from here? I want the ideas behind Clause 9 to work. I suspect that we all do. The real question is whether this is the right way to get addicts off their drugs. I shall deal with this in a fairly seriatim way. Amendments 95 and...

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 June 2009
Reference
711 c506-7GC
House
House of Lords

Perhaps I may come back to the situation. I shall not repeat what I have already said, but it is clear from it that I agree with many of the worries that the noble Baroness, Lady Meacher, has just expressed. One comment that I must make about what she has...

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 June 2009
Reference
711 c526-7GC
House
House of Lords

Amendment 94 94: After Clause 8, insert the following new Clause— "Entitlement to tailored employment and career support (1) All new employment and support allowance (ESA) claimants and existing incapacity benefit claimants who are migrated to ESA, who have a diagnosed mental health problem which impacts on their ability to...

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 June 2009
Reference
711 c483GC
House
House of Lords

It would be a wonderful world if the Government of the day, especially this Government, accepted everything that all your Lordships’ Committees had to say, but that just ain't so.

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 June 2009
Reference
711 c482GC
House
House of Lords

The noble Baroness, Lady Meacher, would have raised the issue of data sharing. I recognise that this is a tricky matter. There is, as ever, a tension between protecting the individual’s privacy and ensuring that enough information is flowing to allow the system to work. Redaction, which is exercising the...

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 June 2009
Reference
711 c523-4GC
House
House of Lords

Amendment 99 99: Schedule 3, page 72, line 38, at end insert— "( ) No information disclosed by a person in compliance with a requirement imposed by regulations under paragraphs 1 to 3 may be adduced in civil proceedings or in any other circumstances disclosed to third parties without the...

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 June 2009
Reference
711 c523GC
House
House of Lords

In that case I will not comment.

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 June 2009
Reference
711 c509GC
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to all noble Lords, including the Minister, who have spoken in this exploratory debate. I said "including the Minister", because she started off by applauding the amendment and then knocked it flat on three grounds. Such is politics. I was grateful to the noble Baroness, Lady Thomas,...

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 June 2009
Reference
711 c493-4GC
House
House of Lords

I am not quite as quick as some Members of the Committee at finding bits of Bills, I have to confess, but the schedule says: ""Regulations may make provision for or in connection with imposing on a person who … is subject to a requirement imposed under paragraph 2, and...

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 June 2009
Reference
711 c507-8GC
House
House of Lords

I rather think that example does not cover any case. However, I shall look very carefully at what the Minister has said, and unless the noble Baroness, Lady Meacher, wants to add anything—

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 June 2009
Reference
711 c534GC
House
House of Lords

There must be some sort of guide; I should have thought that with something as important as this, the department would start asking questions about every three months and not wait for an annual figure.

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 June 2009
Reference
711 c492GC
House
House of Lords