Skip to main content

1-20 of 27 results for subject:Storage

Member X
Lord Rooker

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Rooker, Lord (27)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I thank the Minister for what I consider to be quite a positive Answer. However, does he agree that it is not alarmist to point out the bad decision of the then Chief Secretary, a former Shell employee, in 2017 to refuse the public contribution to maintaining the modest amount of gas storage in the Rough field? On the other hand, if it can be reopened this winter, Centrica was not telling the truth in 2017 about the safety and economic aspects of it. They cannot both be right. Is it not the case that we relied on the stock market and just in time, and this has cost the UK dear? We have a very low level of storage, as the Minister said, and Rough would give us an extra 10 days, compared to Italy which has 157 days. We are miles behind, and it is much better to have some security rather than the minimal amount that we have now. My final question is: can we stay part of the EU system for gas networks, if only for the fact that Ireland gets its gas via the UK?

Asked by
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
7 September 2022
Reference
824 c192
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what progress they have made to reopen storage capacity for North Sea gas that has been closed since 2017.

Asked by
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
7 September 2022
Reference
824 cc191-5
House
House of Lords

asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Written Answer by Lord Rooker on 11 July 2007 (WA 223) on the Buncefield explosion and fire, whether they will reassess the rules governing oil terminals.

Asked by
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 March 2008
Reference
2193; 699 c196-7WA
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in that respect, I was not referring to the Lib Dems. There are plenty of other people who are anti-nuclear—and that is the end of the argument for them—who say, ““You can’t deal with the waste””. When someone comes along to try to deal with the waste, their...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 October 2007
Reference
695 c1238-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, no, I did not say that. One day last week I read the whole transcript of the 11 October committee hearing with Phil Woolas, but I freely admit that I have not read the evidence of Ian Pearson. No, I am simply looking at recommendation 6 of the...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 October 2007
Reference
695 c1239-47
House
House of Lords

Lords debate on motion to take note of the report of the Science and Technology Committee on Radioactive Waste Management: An Update (HL 109 2006-07). Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Earl of Selborne
Answering member
Lord Rooker
Department
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs; Science and Technology Committee (HL)
Type
Debates on select committee reports
Date
29 October 2007
Reference
695 c1219-48
House
House of Lords

My Lords, to reiterate the last point of the noble Lord, Lord Taylor of Holbeach, I am grateful to the noble Earl for bringing the committee’s report before the House. We are not stuck for time; I will not fill all of it, but I am determined to put as...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 October 2007
Reference
695 c1238
House
House of Lords

How they define the meaning of host communities when considering the long-term storage of nuclear waste; and what are the physical limits of a host community.

Asked by
Lord Inglewood (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
7990; 686 c116WA
House
House of Lords

Whether, when they are considering the long-term storage of nuclear waste, the availabilityof the community provision will be coterminous with the physical boundaries of the host community.

Asked by
Lord Inglewood (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 November 2006
Reference
7991; 686 c84WA
House
House of Lords

Whether a devolved Administration in one part of the United Kingdom can veto the long-term storage of high-level nuclear waste from another part of the United Kingdom if they decide to proceed with the long-term storage of high-level nuclear waste generated within their own jurisdiction.

Asked by
Lord Inglewood (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 November 2006
Reference
7989; 686 c84WA
House
House of Lords

Lords statement on the report of the Committee on Radioactive Waste Management.

Lead member
Lord Rooker
Department
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
25 October 2006
Reference
685 c1209-21
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am not going to comment on the political parties. It is exactly the same with the non-governmental organisations, some of which have misused science to play on people’s fears to achieve their policy objective or raise funds. We have to let the science speak, take the risks...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2006
Reference
685 c1221
House
House of Lords

My Lords, with permission, I shall repeat a Statement made earlier in the other House by the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. The Statement is as follows: ““With permission, Mr Speaker, I would like to make a Statement on the report of the Committee on Radioactive...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2006
Reference
685 c1209-12
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I welcome the noble Lord’s confirmation. I asked my officials aboutthis because in the past a lot of people involved in this area would come to round to my house about this subject—and not just those in the industry, but Ministers. So I respect what the noble Lord...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2006
Reference
685 c1217
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will not go down that road. I do not know the details and am going on advice here, but I read out a list of countries where this process appears to work. The evidence is that we ought to be able to find a site—I do not...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2006
Reference
685 c1217
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful for the responses from noble colleagues. The noble Lord, Lord Dixon-Smith, said that the problem has been around for 30 years, and so have the solutions. I am not sure whether that is literally correct, but he is generally correct that many people have considered...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2006
Reference
685 c1215-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as I understand it, most of west Cumbria and the coast are not within the park authority in the first place, so that issue does not arise. But that is a minor point; the central point of the noble Lord’s question relates to devolved Administrations. Today’s Statement has...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2006
Reference
685 c1219
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I can give a more specific answer. I am not familiar with the advice that the Select Committee gave seven years ago. However, only two years ago when Parliament pressed the Energy Act, it gave the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority the status of a non-departmental public body. It is...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2006
Reference
685 c1218
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have had no personal involvement with the devolved Administrations over this, but all the signs are that this is an agreed Statement. The devolved Administrations have been part and parcel of this. This is not a question of abdicating responsibility. The Scottish Executive and the Welsh Assembly...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2006
Reference
685 c1221
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I take my noble friend’s point about needing to overcome an anti-science climate. It does not apply just to this area of activity; there are others. Most people go to hospital without thinking about what happens to the low-level waste. I remember, some years ago, my former colleague,...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2006
Reference
685 c1220
House
House of Lords