Skip to main content

1-20 of 65 results for subject:Audit

Member X
Lord Rooker

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Rooker, Lord (65)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

That is only from the perspective of the councillors. What about the public? They have the right to listen in to the council meetings without travelling, and they are losing that right. Of course, it was left to Mrs Thatcher to get the council meetings open anyway, with her Private...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2023
Reference
831 c1927
House
House of Lords

Further to the Written Answers by the Lord President on 5 July 2004 (WA 59) and the Lord Rooker on 30 June 2005 (WA 45) and 30 November 2005 (WA 45), what are their reasons for not carrying out an infrastructural audit and planning financial expenditure in respect of the reform of post-primary...

Asked by
Lord Maginnis of Drumglass (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
31 January 2006
Reference
3513; 678 c27-8WA
House
House of Lords

I do not know how the particular sum has been fixed. However, we are not expecting a massive number of companies. It just provides another opportunity for those involved in this field to go down another route. That is available to them but we are not pushing it. A nominal...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 July 2005
Reference
673 c53GC
House
House of Lords

I am grateful for the comments of the noble Lords, Lord Glentoran and Lord Smith, and shall do my best to answer the points of the noble Lord, Lord Laird. I shall deal first with the issue about relating closely. This is parity legislation. In the main legislation, some issues...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 July 2005
Reference
673 c52-3GC
House
House of Lords

rose to move, That the Grand Committee do report to the House that it has considered the Companies (Audit, Investigations and Community Enterprise) (Northern Ireland) Order 2005. The noble Lord said: This order would introduce provisions broadly in line with those already in force in Great Britain by the enactment...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 July 2005
Reference
673 c49-50GC
House
House of Lords

Draft SI on companies (audit investigations and community enterprise) (northern ireland). Lords debate on motion to consider. Agreed to on question. Grand Committee off the floor of the House (Moses room)

Lead member
Lord Rooker
Answering member
Lord Glentoran
Department
Northern Ireland Office
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
4 July 2005
Reference
673 c49-53GC
House
House of Lords

Further to the Written Answer by the Lord President on 5 July 2004 (WA 59), whether, in pursuance of the objectives of the Costello report on post-primary education in Northern Ireland, the Northern Ireland Office has now undertaken and completed an infrastructural audit of current educational facilities outside the Greater...

Asked by
Lord Maginnis of Drumglass (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
30 June 2005
Reference
734; 673 c44-5WA
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will seek to answer the points raised by the noble Baroness. Several aspects of the Q and A here relate to Article 29 with regard to emergency planning. Local authorities have already been carrying out emergency planning. It is a discretionary power. The lead responsibility falls to...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 June 2005
Reference
672 c1176-7
House
House of Lords

rose to move, That the draft order laid before the House on 2 March be approved. The noble Lord said: My Lords, the main purpose of the draft Local Government (Northern Ireland) Order 2005 is to update and consolidate Northern Ireland law on local government audit, and to introduce provisions...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 June 2005
Reference
672 c1175-6
House
House of Lords

Draft SI on local government (northern ireland). Lords motion to approve. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Rooker
Answering member
Lord Glentoran
Department
Northern Ireland Office
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
14 June 2005
Reference
672 c1175-7
House
House of Lords

Draft code of audit practice for local NHS bodies. Lords debate on a motion to approve. Agreed to on question. Also debated with draft code of audit practice for local government bodies.

Lead member
Lord Rooker
Answering member
Baroness Hanham
Department
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister
Type
Parliamentary proceedings
Date
9 March 2005
Reference
670 c819-23
House
House of Lords

Lords Written Statement on the laying of the Audit Commission's revised code of audit practice for consideration by the House.

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Department
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister
Type
Written statements
Date
1 February 2005
Reference
669 c8-9WS
House
House of Lords

Further to the Written Answer by the Lord Rooker on 5 July 2004, 663 c66WA, whether they have instructed the Audit Commission to identify accumulated surpluses within local government building control departments; what any overspend identified will be used for; and how they will ensure compliance by local authorities in...

Asked by
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 July 2004
Reference
HL 3786; 664 c47WA
House
House of Lords

What progress has been made in implementing the conclusions of the report of the Audit Commission of November 2003 entitled Strategic Regulation. [HL 1627].

Asked by
Lord Freeman (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 March 2004
Reference
HL 1627; 658 c159WA
House
House of Lords

Whether they will legislate to remove the statutory requirement for Best Value performance plans of parish councils to be audited following the Audit Commission report on minimising the burden of strategic regulation; and whether the "lighter touch" audits will be reduced so that they are lower in total cost over...

Asked by
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 January 2004
Reference
HL 539; 656 c35WA
House
House of Lords

Local Government Bill. Consent of Queen signified. Lords third reading debate. Agreed to on question and returned to the Commons with amendments. (Correction given on 11 September 2003 at 652 c542, in Division No 5 the Contents total was 63, not 43, as reported).

Lead member
Lord Rooker
Answering member
Baroness Hanham
Department
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister
Type
Debates on bills
Date
10 September 2003
Reference
652 c300-95
House
House of Lords

What audit arrangements exist, to which the public have access, in the case of the investigation costs of the Police Complaints Authority. [HL 3472].

Asked by
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 April 2002
Reference
633 c110-1WA; HL 3472
House
House of Lords

What person/organisation is responsible for auditing prison standards; who they will consult in ascertaining whether the standards are observed; and what action the Prison Service has the powers to take against a prison or the governor when the audit shows that a standard or standards have not been complied with....

Asked by
Lord Avebury (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 January 2002
Reference
HL 2047; 630 c112WA
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security, pursuant to his Answer of 31st October, Official Report, 355 c346-7W, what conclusions the Benefits Agency internal audit came to regarding the role of EDS in the duplication of income support payments on 17th and 18th January. - Inc text of...

Asked by
Lord Field of Birkenhead (Labour)
Answering body
Social Security Benefits Agency
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 November 2000
Reference
138338; 356 c804W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, what criteria are used by veterinary officers of the Joint Food Safety and Standards Group during their routine audits of Meat Hygiene Service performance to assess the competence and performance of official veterinary surgeons.

Asked by
Owen Paterson (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
30 June 1999
Reference
88283; 334 c231W
House
House of Commons