Skip to main content

1-20 of 21 results for subject:Imports

Member X
Lord Rooker
Subject X
Transport

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Rooker, Lord (21)
More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Transport (21)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I had not intended to visit the Grand Committee on these SIs today because, as the Minister said, there are no major policy changes. I declare an interest—it is not an interest, really—because I am a member of sifting committee B, helping the world go by with statutory...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2019
Reference
796 cc50-1GC
House
House of Lords

Following what the Minister said in reply to the question from the noble Baroness, Lady McIntosh, I suggest that he had better have a better answer when he comes to deal with the food regulations next week. The noble Baroness asked about RASFF, the rapid alert system for food and...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2019
Reference
796 c62GC
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 70: 70: Clause 12, page 7, line 13, leave out subsection (8) On Question, amendment agreed to.

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2008
Reference
699 c1029
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful for the support for the amendment. To answer the specific questions, the government amendment covers both greenhouse gases that are included in our targets and gases that are not included. For the greenhouse gases that are included in the targets, Clause 20 sets out a...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2008
Reference
699 c1028-9
House
House of Lords

I think the answer to the noble Lord is yes. I saw the report of the work to which he has referred a couple of weeks ago. I think in Committee I gave some information about shipping which made it almost impossible for us to do the measurements at present....

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2008
Reference
699 c1010
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move that the Bill be now further considered on Report. Moved accordingly, and, on Question, Motion agreed to. Clause 10 [Matters to be taken into account in connection with carbon budgets]:

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2008
Reference
699 c982
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Baroness for bringing back this issue, but I draw the attention of the House to subsection (3) of Clause 10, with which the amendment deals. It states: "““Nothing in this section is to be read as restricting the matters that the Secretary...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2008
Reference
699 c984
House
House of Lords

moved Amendments Nos. 49 and 50: 49: After Clause 10, insert the following new Clause— ““Duty to provide indicative annual ranges for net UK carbon account (1) As soon as is reasonably practicable after making an order setting the carbon budget for a budgetary period, the Secretary of State must...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2008
Reference
699 c985
House
House of Lords

I have got to do my best. I want to disabuse noble Lords. I do not have the answer in front of me but when I used the phrase in Committee ““accident of history”” I was referring to the fact that the Prime Minister had a role in making certain...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2008
Reference
699 c992
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am making a genuine point. What counts is the substance of the Bill and the operation of government. I have obviously failed to get an issue across in Committee. Do not get me wrong; I am not knocking it. A lot of points have been raised to...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2008
Reference
699 c993
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the answer may be yes, but I am doing my best to make sure that it is not carried in this place. We would like to have Royal Assent before the summer so that the climate change committee can get on with its work. The time this Bill...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2008
Reference
699 c994-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, all those issues apply to current legislation and are nothing to do with climate change. Since devolution, they apply across the piece where there are issues relating to the devolved Administration and the Government at Westminster. The Bill was introduced following the gracious Speech last year, and the...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2008
Reference
699 c994
House
House of Lords

moved Amendments Nos. 53 and 54: 53: Clause 11, page 6, line 20, at end insert— ““( ) The report must, in particular, set out— (a) the Secretary of State’s current proposals and policies under section (Duty to prepare proposals and policies for meeting carbon budgets), and (b) the time-scales...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2008
Reference
699 c999
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Lord. I can cut to the quick here. Following debates that we have had both inside and outside the House, we can be sure that climate change will be regularly debated in Parliament over the coming years. The Government alone, of course,...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2008
Reference
699 c1000
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I feel as though I need to say this because the noble Lord has obviously cut the ground from under me, although I do not want it to be agreed that he has. While the Government are boasting about giving a lead by introducing the Bill unilaterally, without...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2008
Reference
699 c1023
House
House of Lords

moved Amendments Nos. 67 and 68: 67: Clause 12, page 7, line 8, leave out ““budgetary period in which the year falls”” and insert ““year”” 68: Clause 12, page 7, line 11, leave out ““budgetary period”” and insert ““year”” On Question, amendments agreed to. [Amendment No. 69 had been withdrawn...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2008
Reference
699 c1026
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 69A: 69A: Clause 12, page 7, line 12, at end insert— ““(7A) It must state— (a) the amount of net UK emissions of each targeted greenhouse gas for the year 1990, and (b) a baseline amount for each greenhouse gas that is not a targeted greenhouse gas,...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2008
Reference
699 c1027
House
House of Lords

This has been a useful debate. As has been said, there are two amendments here which would make key changes to the Bill. The first, which has been concentrated on to a large extent, would replace the concept of international aviation and shipping emissions with emissions from international passenger travel...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2008
Reference
699 c1020-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I realise that we will cover some similar material when we come to debate the next group of amendments. Therefore, I shall not prejudge Amendment No. 65. Indeed, if Amendment No. 64 is carried, we will not have the opportunity to debate Amendment No. 65. Nevertheless, there are...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2008
Reference
699 c1007-9
House
House of Lords

asked Her Majesty's Government:Why cattle in bluetongue restricted zones in the United Kingdom may not be transported when cattle from similar restricted zones in Germany were allowed to be imported into the United Kingdom.

Asked by
Baroness Masham of Ilton (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 January 2008
Reference
1449; 698 c57WA
House
House of Lords