Skip to main content

1-3 of 3 results for subject:"House of Commons"

Member X
Lord Rooker
Subject X
Government departments

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Rooker, Lord (3)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Government departments (3)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I have been here for the greater part of the debate; I intended no discourtesy whatsoever to the Front Bench or to your Lordships’ House in not being able to arrive earlier today. There are also the unique circumstances of the fact that this is the only opportunity...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour Independent)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2010
Reference
718 c1038-9
House
House of Lords

I did not want to get into this. The supplementary vote is more unfair than the alternative vote, as the London Assembly elections show anyway. I did not want to go down that route because I wanted to stick to talking about the alternative vote. That is what is in...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour Independent)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2010
Reference
718 c1039-40
House
House of Lords

If SO will list those topics on which it is not practice to answer parliamentary questions; and to list any recent changes in the practice of Department. - (Holding answer 9 February 1994).

Asked by
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Answering body
Scottish Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
14 February 1994
Reference
237 c592W
House
House of Commons