Skip to main content

1-20 of 23 results for subject:"Living wage"

Member X
Jonathan Reynolds

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Reynolds, Jonathan (23)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

What assessment his Department has made of the potential impact of the National Minimum Wage and National Living Wage on families in Airdrie and Shotts constituency.

Asked by
Kenneth Stevenson (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Business and Trade
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
13 March 2025
Reference
903162; 763 cc1242-4
House
House of Commons

What assessment his Department has made of the potential impact of the National Minimum Wage and National Living Wage on families.

Asked by
Luke Akehurst (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Business and Trade
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
13 March 2025
Reference
903165; 763 cc1242-4
House
House of Commons

More than 3 million workers are expected to receive a pay rise due to increases to the national minimum wage in April, protecting the lowest paid in society. After our changes to the remit, we accepted in full the recommendations of the Low Pay Commission, which considers the impact of rates on business, competitiveness, the labour market, the wider economy and the cost of living. Our impact assessments are available only by region—estimates by constituency are not available—but the simple truth is that workers in every constituency are better off under this Labour Government.

Answered by
Jonathan Reynolds (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
13 March 2025
Reference
763 c1242
House
House of Commons

The plan to make work pay is a core part of our mission to grow the economy, raise living standards and create opportunities for all, and there will be significant benefits for workers in insecure and low-paid jobs in central Scotland, including in Airdrie and Shotts. This plan is about making people stay in work. It is about making work more secure and more family-friendly, improving living standards and putting more money in workers’ pockets, but it is also about showing that politics can work for people who may have given up on this place as somewhere that can improve their living standards, their lives and those of their families. For that, I am very proud of this Government.

Answered by
Jonathan Reynolds (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
13 March 2025
Reference
763 c1245
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for his support. Around 140,000 workers in north-east England will feel the benefits of this direct pay rise. I know his North Durham constituency well—I am no stranger to Chester-le-Street—and not only will his constituents get a pay rise, but his local shops, his restaurants, his pubs and more will get what they need most of all: customers who have got a bit of money to spend.

Answered by
Jonathan Reynolds (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
13 March 2025
Reference
763 c1243
House
House of Commons

The thing I would cite most of all to the hon. Member’s constituents is the doubling of the employment allowance in the Budget and the threshold being removed, which means that some smaller businesses will actually be paying lower national insurance contributions than they would have paid before the Budget. However, I never shy away from the fact that the choices we had to make in the Budget were out of necessity, due to the black hole that was left behind. I am yet to hear any offer from Conservative Members as to how they would fill it.

At these questions, we will talk about tripling compensation for victims of the Post Office Horizon scandal only because the money is there. It was not there under the Conservative party. We will talk about money for the steel industry, standing behind that industry. Again, money was promised but not delivered. If promises are made, the resources to do those things have to be there. They were not there under the Conservative party. They are under Labour.

Answered by
Jonathan Reynolds (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
13 March 2025
Reference
763 c1243
House
House of Commons

As I have said to Conservative Members before, of course we are very sensitive to the aggregate impact of Government policy, because, frankly, having observed the Conservative Governments of the previous 14 years, I thought they completely missed this point and at many times had different Departments doing completely opposing things.

I want to say something specific on business rates. No business rates relief was planned had the Conservative party won the election. The reduction to 40% was an increase in what was in the national accounts—again, short-term decisions for short-term, partisan, political benefit; no serious plan for the future.

The hon. Gentleman will have seen the figures from the Insolvency Service this week, which are very interesting. They show that fewer people have been made redundant over the past 12 months than in the year before, so I am afraid that the doom-mongers of the Conservative party have been proved absolutely wrong by the statistics that we have.

Answered by
Jonathan Reynolds (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
13 March 2025
Reference
763 c1244
House
House of Commons

This Government is committed to making work pay.

As part of our ambitious agenda, we pledged to update the remit to the Low Pay Commission to formally take account of the cost of living for the first time, and I am pleased to confirm that this has been achieved.

As...

Member
Jonathan Reynolds (Labour)
Department
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Written statements
Date
30 July 2024
Reference
HCWS43
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.

Member
Jonathan Reynolds (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2019
Reference
652 c248
House
House of Commons

This group of amendments relates to the tax and fiscal implications of the UK’s withdrawal from the EU.

Throughout the last year Parliament has been asked to approve a series of Bills giving the Government the power to deliver every type of Brexit deal conceivable, and this Finance Bill is no...

Member
Jonathan Reynolds (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2019
Reference
652 cc251-2
House
House of Commons

The facts are as they are. It is far too late for that. Everyone knows the position that this country is in. The Government have run down the clock. They lost their majority through a general election that they did not need to call, and it is far too late...

Member
Jonathan Reynolds (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2019
Reference
652 cc252-3
House
House of Commons

I absolutely agree with my hon. Friend. We all know that several members of the Government take that view, even though they may not be able to say it on the record. They are quite clear as to what no deal would mean, and they would not contemplate going down...

Member
Jonathan Reynolds (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2019
Reference
652 c253
House
House of Commons

Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker.

I have just talked about some of the consequences of crashing out without a deal. I have talked about relationships, about tariffs on products and about the legal definitions under the common agreements that this country has undertaken with other European countries. We all know this—the...

Member
Jonathan Reynolds (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2019
Reference
652 c253
House
House of Commons

And yes, people are frustrated with the Government.

Member
Jonathan Reynolds (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2019
Reference
652 c253
House
House of Commons

The Father of the House is as accurate as ever. Some colleagues are pursuing a dangerous argument that all our trading relationships with countries that are not in the EU are somehow currently under WTO terms, which is an absurd misconception. We have entered into trade agreements as a member...

Member
Jonathan Reynolds (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2019
Reference
652 c254
House
House of Commons

We simply do not know the answer to that question. I always listen to what the right hon. Gentleman has to say in Treasury and Finance Bill debates, but he is one of the archetypal Members who come to the House and pursues what I call the BMW argument: “Everything...

Member
Jonathan Reynolds (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2019
Reference
652 c254
House
House of Commons

I thoroughly agree that what the Government have got us into is not a great negotiating position, but that is because the negotiations have been

driven by the best interests of the internal politics of the Conservative party. If the national interest had been considered, we would be in a...

Member
Jonathan Reynolds (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2019
Reference
652 cc254-5
House
House of Commons

The merits of the Government undertaking contingency measures are different from the political case that we must consider, which is whether we would find it desirable to undertake a course of action that would mean that we had to use those contingency measures. The focus of the debate in this...

Member
Jonathan Reynolds (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2019
Reference
652 c255
House
House of Commons

I will take an intervention from the hon. Member for Dover (Charlie Elphicke), and I may come to the hon. Member for Shrewsbury and Atcham (Daniel Kawczynski) if the intervention is good enough.

Member
Jonathan Reynolds (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2019
Reference
652 c255
House
House of Commons

I completely disagree with the hon. Gentleman, and a little humility from Conservative Members on the point about responsibility for the Brexit negotiations would be appreciated. For my entire lifetime, this country’s European policy has been dictated by the internal politics of the Conservative party. Every Conservative Prime Minister in...

Member
Jonathan Reynolds (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2019
Reference
652 c255
House
House of Commons