Skip to main content

1-20 of 43 results for subject:Finance

Member X
Bill Rammell
Subject X
Qualifications

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Rammell, Bill (43)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Qualifications (43)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

We are not cutting funding to higher education; in fact, funding has been and is increasing significantly. Our decision is the right one for lifelong learning. It directs funds to those who most need them and is a fairer way to spend public money. It is the best way of making progress towards the target that 40 per cent. of the working-age population should have a higher-level qualification.
Answered by
Bill Rammell (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
10 January 2008
Reference
470 c503
House
House of Commons
We are not cutting funding to higher education; in fact, funding has been and is increasing significantly. Our decision is the right one for lifelong learning. It directs funds to those who most need them and is a fairer way to spend public money. It is the best way of making progress towards the target that 40 per cent. of the working-age population should have a higher-level qualification.
Answered by
Bill Rammell (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
10 January 2008
Reference
470 c503
House
House of Commons
The hon. Gentleman has bandied about several statistics this week. Earlier this week, he gave a fanciful figure about the financial impact on the Open university. The merit of his argument is not helped by exaggeration. We strongly believe that, with the protections that are in place, open institutions such as the Open university and Birkbeck are best placed to reap the rewards of the growth that we are proposing.
Answered by
Bill Rammell (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
10 January 2008
Reference
470 c504-5
House
House of Commons
If one had asked Jennie Lee in 1966 whether she thought that a founding core element of the mission of the Open university was to provide degrees for people who already have them, I do not think that she would have recognised that description of its central purpose. In the hon. Gentleman's party, money always grows on trees, but in government one has to make choices and set priorities, and I believe that the interests of those who are not yet at first degree level come first.
Answered by
Bill Rammell (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
10 January 2008
Reference
470 c505
House
House of Commons
My hon. Friend is absolutely right. It was he who pointed out in the debate earlier this week that we heard not one word from the Opposition about the importance of targeting people in our communities who are not yet at first degree level. Six million adults in the workplace have the equivalent of A-level qualifications but have not yet progressed to degree level. I believe that they are our first priority in public expenditure.
Answered by
Bill Rammell (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
10 January 2008
Reference
470 c504
House
House of Commons
I am indeed concerned about the interests of women. Of the 20 million adults within the workplace who do not have a first degree, 10 million are women. As the Secretary of State explained, women who already have a first degree will be able to take a vocational foundation degree, which is in many senses the most effective way to retrain, and to apply for one of the strategically important and vulnerable exempted subjects. They will be able to consider those avenues, and that will help them to retrain and reskill.
Answered by
Bill Rammell (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
10 January 2008
Reference
470 c505
House
House of Commons
I do not believe that that is the case at all. [Laughter.] Forgive me—perhaps it is not a surprise, but I do not agree with that. There was a request for reassurance that institutions will be able to cope with this pace of change, and we have set out very clearly, in detailed terms, the protections that will be available to enable them to do so. That is why people are being, and will be, reassured.
Answered by
Bill Rammell (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
10 January 2008
Reference
470 c504
House
House of Commons
I do not believe that there is a case for delay. Were we to delay, the alternative critique would be that we were not allowing institutions sufficient time to plan for the new system. Interestingly, as the Secretary of State said earlier, the Conservative party did not oppose our policy in our debates earlier this week. It offered principled opposition for just one year—until the 2009 commission. With respect, that is not really principled opposition, but opportunism.
Answered by
Bill Rammell (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
10 January 2008
Reference
470 c503-4
House
House of Commons
What assessment he has made of the effect that withdrawal of funding for equivalent or lower qualifications will have on lifelong learning.
Asked by
Andrew MacKay (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
10 January 2008
Reference
470 c503; 177254
House
House of Commons
What assessment he has made of the effect that withdrawal of funding for equivalent or lower qualifications will have on lifelong learning.
Asked by
Lord Harper (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
10 January 2008
Reference
470 c503; 177248
House
House of Commons

If one looks at the long term trend, it is not accurate to say that the number has grown. Broadly, the percentage has remained similar. I am not denying that this is a significant challenge for us. Across Government, real effort is going into this area. Some of the reforms...

Member
Bill Rammell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2007
Reference
462 c1637
House
House of Commons

I welcome the hon. Member for Brent, East (Sarah Teather) to her new position and, for the avoidance of doubt, I confirm that I continue to be the Minister with lead responsibility for the Learning and Skills Council. The hon. Lady referred to some of the remarks that I made...

Member
Bill Rammell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2007
Reference
462 c1636-7
House
House of Commons

If I were standing here now—a week or so after announcing the government machinery changes—setting out a blueprint of exactly how we intend to proceed, I would be criticised for having drawn it up behind closed doors and for not having consulted people or involved them in the process. As...

Member
Bill Rammell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2007
Reference
462 c1640-1
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend raises a serious and important point. The new Department takes bullying extraordinarily seriously, as we did in the former Department. We must ensure that there is best practice in every school. We must also ensure that schools are not blind to the problem and do not carry...

Member
Bill Rammell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2007
Reference
462 c1637-8
House
House of Commons

We will certainly come back and look at the issue, but we must consult on the detail, and we must make a decision once 14 to 19 funding is transferred to local authorities’ ring-fenced budgets about which is the appropriate body to manage the overall intervention regime. It is right...

Member
Bill Rammell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2007
Reference
462 c1639-40
House
House of Commons

I cannot, and will not, give the specific commitment that the hon. Lady asks for, as if I were to do so it would pre-empt legitimate consultation on the detail of this matter, which should take place. It is certainly the case that we will have to consider changing the...

Member
Bill Rammell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2007
Reference
462 c1639
House
House of Commons

I am not denying, and I have not denied, that there will be a need for further legislation. However, a move to demand-led funding does not require further legislative change. That is possible and is happening at the moment. The proportions of demand-led funding are increasing significantly as of today....

Member
Bill Rammell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2007
Reference
462 c1638
House
House of Commons

It certainly is our intention to have a common set of funding principles for schools and FE. We are already making significant progress in reducing the funding gap between school sixth forms and FE, which is a very important and positive step forward. The hon. Lady also asked whether we...

Member
Bill Rammell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2007
Reference
462 c1641
House
House of Commons

Our discussion on Third Reading has been an important one. I should start by paying tribute to the hon. Member for South Holland and The Deepings (Mr. Hayes): he was doing a service in delivering his insightful and lengthy contribution, as today is his 10th wedding anniversary and he needs...

Member
Bill Rammell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2007
Reference
462 c1709-10
House
House of Commons

I can lay claim to many skills, but dancing is not among them. What I said about wanting greater self-regulation is not at all inconsistent. I urge the hon. Gentleman to talk to the self-regulation group, which is made up of FE college providers who are enthusiastic and committed to...

Member
Bill Rammell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2007
Reference
462 c1649-50
House
House of Commons