Skip to main content

1-20 of 61 results for subject:"Labour market"

Member X
James Purnell

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Purnell, James (61)
More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Just to clarify, that is not the proposal. The proposal is that the Freud pilots will apply to 20 per cent. of people on incapacity benefit. The proposals we are bringing forward for pilots with people who are new claimants will apply to 20 per cent. Everybody else will get...

Member
James Purnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2009
Reference
487 c198
House
House of Commons

Perhaps the hon. Gentleman would like to tell us whether the Scottish Government are going to support this policy to help people get treatment, thus reversing his party's policy as well.

Member
James Purnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2009
Reference
487 c195
House
House of Commons

I can tell the hon. Gentleman that we have certainly not learned from the Scottish Government, whose policy is one of opposition on ethical grounds. Our ethical position is that money should not be going from the taxpayer into the pockets of drug dealers, but should be used to help...

Member
James Purnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2009
Reference
487 c195
House
House of Commons

It is impossible to charge interest under this Bill. That would require further primary legislation.

Member
James Purnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2009
Reference
487 c200
House
House of Commons

The system proposed in the Bill would bring in that requirement earlier—after two years—so perhaps there is not so much difference between our proposals as has been understood.

Member
James Purnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2009
Reference
487 c192
House
House of Commons

I want to make some progress, if I may, as I do not want to strain the patience of the House. The new progression to work category will be about saying to people not that they have to work immediately but that they have to prepare for work. That will...

Member
James Purnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2009
Reference
487 c192-3
House
House of Commons

That is a very good point. Indeed, the Leader of the Opposition argued recently that there were 5 million people on benefits, each of whom was a potential Karen Matthews. That is the wrong argument, because it stigmatises people, and because the vast majority of people on benefits do want...

Member
James Purnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2009
Reference
487 c193-4
House
House of Commons

Indeed; that is exactly what the provisions in the Bill would enable us to do after two years. We want to ensure that we give people work at that stage, but we would require them to take it up. I saw my right hon. Friend's proposals yesterday; I always look...

Member
James Purnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2009
Reference
487 c192
House
House of Commons

I am happy to give that assurance. Indeed, the Gregg review covered that. Workfare is a system whereby people are punished and distanced from the labour market by removing their entitlement to work search and by their being stigmatised. We propose full-time activity, supported by looking for jobs and helping...

Member
James Purnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2009
Reference
487 c192
House
House of Commons

The matter is partly about evidence and partly about the wishes of fathers. At the moment, fathers feel that it is far too complicated to register when they are not married. There are lots of examples in which fathers wanted to be involved but were unable to do so. It...

Member
James Purnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2009
Reference
487 c185
House
House of Commons

As I have explained to my right hon. Friend the Member for Birkenhead (Mr. Field), we are trying to strike a balance. We think that we have struck the balance in the right place. The proposal involves working with registrars to get far more fathers registered, and registrars have plenty...

Member
James Purnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2009
Reference
487 c185-6
House
House of Commons

There are questions about how much the cost will be, and we have worked with the Royal National Institute of Blind People on that. However, yes, the Bill is self-financing. We have made a number of simplifications and changes so that we can invest more in helping people. If we...

Member
James Purnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2009
Reference
487 c187
House
House of Commons

That particular group is mainly the responsibility of the Department for Children, Schools and Families, with which we obviously work closely. The Bill will not make any difference to people under 18, as its measures are focused at the over-18s, but the hon. Lady makes an important point. It is...

Member
James Purnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2009
Reference
487 c190
House
House of Commons

Of course, we never want to impose sanctions. We want people to comply with the system, which is exactly why we asked Professor Paul Gregg to look into conditionality regimes around the world and in the UK. He found that where people are required to come in and take up...

Member
James Purnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2009
Reference
487 c190
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman is right to suggest that there is an issue with the system. People can lose their benefits if they refuse a reasonable job—the Conservative party proposes to introduce that, but provision for it already exists. It is difficult to sanction someone on the basis of their...

Member
James Purnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2009
Reference
487 c191
House
House of Commons

Because what the right hon. Lady describes is legally impossible, and I hope that she will not repeat her mistake.

Member
James Purnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2009
Reference
487 c200
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend makes a good point. I do not say that we should not sanction people who behave in the way he describes, but that it is hard to find out when they are doing that. When it is clear, we can take away people's benefits. However, my hon....

Member
James Purnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2009
Reference
487 c191-2
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend makes a good point. People often talk about help for people who can work and security for those who cannot. When I talk to disabled people, I find that they hate that expression because they hate the idea of anybody being told that they cannot work. We...

Member
James Purnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2009
Reference
487 c188
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady makes a good point. That is what good social care is all about. Carers and families could be appointed to act as agents or support people in making the choices. As I am sure the hon. Lady would agree, in the past few years we have seen...

Member
James Purnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2009
Reference
487 c187
House
House of Commons

That is an important point. I believe that the Liberal Democrat-controlled council in Aberdeen has used individual budgets for that very reason. That should not be done with this policy, which is not about changing people's entitlement but about how they get their money and making sure that they can...

Member
James Purnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2009
Reference
487 c187-8
House
House of Commons