Skip to main content

1-7 of 7 results for subject:Patients

Member X
Mike Penning
Subject X
Conflict of interests

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Penning, Mike (7)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Conflict of interests (7)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

The Cumberlege report was fantastic. The Minister accepted some of what it said but not in relation to Primodos, especially in the area of compensation. Can we look at that again?

Member
Mike Penning (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2022
Reference
711 c863
House
House of Commons

May I press the Minister and draw her back to the Cumberlege report? What she is talking about going forward sounds really good, and the proof will be in the pudding, as my grandmother would have said. But recommendation 4 of Baroness Cumberlege’s report for the Government talks about—this is...

Member
Mike Penning (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2022
Reference
708 c1020WH
House
House of Commons

It is fortunate that we have so much time because we can ask lots of questions. Marie Lyon, the Primodos campaigner, has effectively been told by the Minister’s predecessor, “See you in court”. I do not know about the experiences of the other conditions, but the Primodos campaigners do not...

Member
Mike Penning (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2022
Reference
708 c1025WH
House
House of Commons

The Primodos victims—I am not allowed to talk about the court case—have had no choice. They are in court now because the Government would not take on Cumberlege recommendation 4. It is all well and good talking about what will happen in the future, but they are living with this...

Member
Mike Penning (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2022
Reference
708 c1030WH
House
House of Commons

Baroness Cumberlege specifically states in her report that her terms of reference prevented her from talking about individual compensation and redress. Is my right hon.

Friend suspicious, like me and probably many others, that that was specifically written into the plan so that she could not do what my right...

Member
Mike Penning (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2022
Reference
708 c215WH
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Rosindell.

Groundhog day—here we go again. This is almost the identical debate that we had before. If this was in the main Chamber, especially if it was not on a Thursday afternoon, the Chamber would be full, because there is not...

Member
Mike Penning (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2022
Reference
708 cc232-5WH
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady may be new to the House, but she is doing very well in trying to understand the position. In the case of Primodos, that was not a drug that was going to cure anything; it was simply a tablet that told the person who took it whether...

Member
Mike Penning (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2022
Reference
708 c243WH
House
House of Commons