Skip to main content

1-20 of 93 results for subject:Redundancy

Member X
Edward O'Hara

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
O'Hara, Edward (93)

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what assessment he has made of the compatibility of existing provisions of employer redundancy schemes with age discrimination regulations, with particular reference to his Department’s own redundancy scheme.

Asked by
Edward O'Hara (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
22 March 2007
Reference
458 c1086W; 127585
House
House of Commons

That this House is deeply concerned at the recent announcement by P&O that they intend to dismiss 1,200 UK seafarers; notes that many of those who will be left will be faced with cuts in pay and conditions; regrets that this will cause much hardship for many families especially within...

Primary sponsor
Gwyn Prosser (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
12 October 2004
Reference
1715
House
House of Commons

That this House notes that the current formula for calculating redundancy payments is based on the Redundancy Payments Act 1965 and needs urgent reform; believes that the outcome of this statutory formula results in parsimonious payments for those unfortunate enough to suffer redundancy and further reinforces the notion that it...

Primary sponsor
David Crausby (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
9 June 2004
Reference
1333
House
House of Commons

That this House supports the efforts of employees and former employees of companies like Endeva and UEF who have suffered from the heavy-handed and shabby attitude of the administrator whose stark powers in dealing with insolvency ignores the needs and proper protection of workers; notes that the powers given to...

Primary sponsor
Gwyn Prosser (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
7 June 2004
Reference
1316
House
House of Commons

That this House believes that it would be preferable for honourable and Right honourable Members and other well-paid workers in Parliament, such as high-ranking officers and journalists, to pay more realistic prices for their refreshments than see loyal employees in the many outlets for food and drink in the House...

Primary sponsor
Ann Cryer (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
2 December 2003
Reference
184
House
House of Commons

That this House notes that soon after securing a ??101 million order to supply rolling stock for the London Underground, the French-owned multinational, Alstom, announced that it had decided to cease production at its plant at Washwood Heath, Birmingham, thereby bringing to an end 150 years of train production at...

Primary sponsor
Terry Davis (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
7 July 2003
Reference
1537
House
House of Commons

That this House deplores the manner in which the Accident Group recently dismissed its workforce by text message; notes with grave concern the fact that the company has not paid tax and insurance stoppages on to the Inland Revenue; expresses outrage that directors of the company have protected their personal...

Primary sponsor
George Howarth (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
1 July 2003
Reference
1495
House
House of Commons

That this House is concerned by the decision by BAe Systems to make over 1,000 of its workforce redundant as a response to the MoD decision to bring the Nimrod programme to a controlled stop; calls on the Government and the company to work with the trades unions on those...

Primary sponsor
Patsy Calton (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Early day motions
Date
3 June 2003
Reference
1306
House
House of Commons

That this House is deeply troubled that OFTEL's decision on access arrangements to Directory enquiry services, which have led BT to advise that a large part of its '192' operations will be transferred to India, could lead to an even greater transfer of customer contact work in other sectors such...

Primary sponsor
Geraldine Smith (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
5 March 2003
Reference
840
House
House of Commons

That this House supports the Amicus AEEU campaign to lift the ??250 statutory cap on redundancy payment calculations; recognises that it is far too easy for multi-national companies to make British workers redundant rather than their counterparts in Europe; and urges the Government to lift the cap in order to...

Primary sponsor
David Crausby (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
22 May 2002
Reference
1368
House
House of Commons

That this House notes that the tax threshold for redundancy pay has remained at its present level of ??30,000 for many years; and calls upon the government to raise the threshold to ??40,000 and thereafter to increase the threshold annually in line with the percentage increase in national average earnings.

Primary sponsor
Helen Jones (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
15 May 2002
Reference
1315
House
House of Commons

That this House welcomes the significant steps taken since 1997 to achieve fair treatment at work; notes, however, that employees sacked by companies in receivership are cruelly exposed to loss of contractual rights; believes that the legal loophole concerning the unsecured status of rights to redundancy pay should be closed...

Type
Early day motions
Date
12 March 2002
Reference
985
House
House of Commons

That this House notes with sadness the plans of Volex Powercords to make 220 people redundant in Leigh by ending its long tradition of manufacturing in the town; pays tribute to the local work-force many of whom have given long service to the company and contributed greatly to its expansion...

Primary sponsor
Andy Burnham (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
6 March 2002
Reference
941
House
House of Commons

That this House welcomes the established position of the Department of Trade and Industry in extending European Coal and Steel payments to redundant workers who were involved in the production of certain non-ECSC product which nevertheless have still been made by companies related to steel production, including stainless steel tubes...

Primary sponsor
Harry Barnes (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
11 February 2002
Reference
838
House
House of Commons

That this House calls upon Her Majesty's Government to condemn the action of P&O Nedloyd in making 81 British seaman redundant and replacing them by Filipino labour; and asks for a statement of the Government's intentions in this matter.

Primary sponsor
Peter Viggers (Conservative)
Type
Early day motions
Date
11 December 2001
Reference
552
House
House of Commons

That this House views with serious concern the decision by First North Western to withdraw platform staff from Central Station, Warrington, and leave the station unstaffed from 8.40 p.m.; notes that the station provides important public transport services for people travelling to and from work or using the facilities of...

Primary sponsor
Helen Southworth (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
14 April 1999
Reference
536
House
House of Commons

That this House is gravely concerned about the decision of Thomas de la Rue to close two of the three print lines, and destroy 375 jobs at their Team Valley plant in Gateshead; deplores the pressure of the City for short-term profits which has caused this decision; questions the integrity...

Primary sponsor
John McWilliam (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
19 June 1998
Reference
1447
House
House of Commons

That this House recognises the achievement of the Lucas Aerospace workers in Burnley and management in converting from the manufacture of MLRS rocket cases to gas bottles for compressed natural gas as an alternative environmentally friendly fuel for road vehicles; regrets that Ford Motors in the USA have failed to...

Primary sponsor
Peter L Pike (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
17 June 1998
Reference
1443
House
House of Commons

Wednesday adjournment debate on government assistance to Ford plant at Halewood.

Lead member
Edward O'Hara
Answering member
Greg Knight
Department
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
5 February 1997
Reference
289 c921-42;289 c919-40
House
House of Commons
Supplementary on job losses at Ford's Halewood plant.
Asked by
Edward O'Hara (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Trade and Industry
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
22 January 1997
Reference
288 c947
House
House of Commons