Skip to main content

1-20 of 129 results for subject:Accountability

Member X
Lord Myners

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Myners, Lord (129)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Will the Minister assure the House that nothing in the proposals made by the Government in respect of these bodies will in any way inhibit the freedom of recommendation of the Independent Commission on Banking? It is widely recognised that one of the key issues in banking is inadequate competition....

Member
Lord Myners (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 March 2011
Reference
725 c1668-9
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government , further to the Written Answer by Lord De Mauley on 22 December (WA 347), to whom non-executive directors appointed to departments of state report; who determines their effectiveness; and by what criteria.

Asked by
Lord Myners (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 January 2011
Reference
5724; 724 c148WA
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government to whom the non-executive directors appointed by departments of state will report.

Asked by
Lord Myners (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 January 2011
Reference
5485; 724 c5WA
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am pleased to open the debate on the Fiscal Responsibility Bill. I intend to provide a general overview of the key provisions of this important Bill and the background to it. As my right honourable friend the Chancellor explained in the other place, the Government have set...

Member
Lord Myners (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2010
Reference
717 c734-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords who contributed to the debate. It has been a very wide-ranging debate in which many issues have been raised, all of which I found very interesting and have noted. One feature common to all the speeches was a clear commitment to the need...

Member
Lord Myners (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2010
Reference
717 c769-70
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord, Lord Lawson, for that intervention. The scale of the Government’s approach to fiscal management is made very clear in the supporting schedules to the Pre-Budget Report. There is absolute clarity there about the glide path to fiscal responsibility that my right honourable friend the Chancellor...

Member
Lord Myners (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2010
Reference
717 c770
House
House of Lords

I was going to come to that point when I dealt with the interventions of the noble Lord, Lord Newby. I had already written on my notepad that this was clearly a matter into which I should look, and that I will owe a letter to the noble Lord. I...

Member
Lord Myners (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2010
Reference
717 c770-3
House
House of Lords

I am afraid that I did not see the newspaper interview to which the noble Lord, Lord Lamont, refers and therefore cannot comment on it. Quite clearly, however, there is a commitment contained in this Bill and in our financial plans significantly to reduce the deficit. As I was saying,...

Member
Lord Myners (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2010
Reference
717 c736-8
House
House of Lords

That the Bill be read a second time.

Member
Lord Myners (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2010
Reference
717 c734
House
House of Lords

Noble Lords would not expect me to come to Parliament on the basis of number work that I had done on my own. They would be suspicious that I had started with the answer I sought and that I had done the arithmetic to arrive at that answer. The information...

Member
Lord Myners (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2010
Reference
717 c773-5
House
House of Lords

Fiscal Responsibility Bill. Lords second reading debate. Agreed to on question. Committee negatived. Standing Order 47 having been dispensed with, the Bill was read a third time (formal) and passed.

Lead member
Lord Myners
Answering member
Baroness Noakes
Department
Treasury
Type
Debates on bills
Date
10 February 2010
Reference
717 c734-76
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the intention behind this amendment is to ensure that the special resolution objectives, under Clause 4 and the code of practice, under Clause 5, apply to the powers to take a bank holding company into temporary public ownership. I shall be brief in explaining how this is already...

Member
Lord Myners (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2009
Reference
707 c583
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Oakeshott, for giving way. What I said—and I chose my words very precisely—was that the ratio of sterling to bund interest rates saw sterling within the favourable band of the medium-term trend. I was not talking about absolute rates, but rather medium-term...

Member
Lord Myners (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2009
Reference
707 c650
House
House of Lords

Clause 256: Statutory instruments Amendments 114 and 115 114: Clause 256, page 129, line 28, leave out ““Negative resolution”” and insert ““Draft affirmative resolution”” 115: Clause 256, page 130, line 36, at end insert— Amendments 114 and 115 agreed.

Member
Lord Myners (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2009
Reference
707 c657
House
House of Lords

I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 82 withdrawn. Amendment 83 not moved. Clause 233 : Regulations: procedure Amendment 84 not moved.

Member
Lord Myners (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2009
Reference
707 c606
House
House of Lords

Clause 230: Definition Amendment 82 82: Clause 230, page 116, line 25, leave out paragraph (a) and insert— ““(a) provide that a specified class of institution, which has a permission under Part 4 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 to carry on a regulated activity, is to be...

Member
Lord Myners (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2009
Reference
707 c605
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as I said yesterday, there are a number of areas in relation to this Bill where further consideration would be helpful before the issues are debated again. One such area is the Government’s provisions for investment bank insolvency. While these provisions have been accepted by the House, there...

Member
Lord Myners (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2009
Reference
707 c606
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I assure the House that I have taken seriously the concerns expressed last week by several noble Lords about the interaction between the members of the tripartite in the area of financial stability. Before turning to the amendments in this group, I emphasise that the Government believe, as...

Member
Lord Myners (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2009
Reference
707 c608-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this amendment, similar to the one that the noble Baroness moved in Committee, would create a requirement for the Bank of England to write to the FSA on the subject of financial stability. The FSA would be required to respond to any such letter and have regard to...

Member
Lord Myners (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2009
Reference
707 c636-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Clause 242 removes a requirement laid out in the Bank Charter Act 1844, which stipulates that the Bank of England should publish a weekly return. The weekly return is a one-page summary of the Bank’s monetary assets and liabilities for the week in question. Under the clause, the...

Member
Lord Myners (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2009
Reference
707 c640-2
House
House of Lords