Skip to main content

1-10 of 10 results for subject:Misuse

Member X
Baroness Murphy
Subject X
Medical treatments

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Murphy, Baroness (10)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Medical treatments (10)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I wonder if my noble friend Lord Rea will allow me to be his friendly neighbourhood psychiatrist. I must confess that whenever I am inundated by hundreds of briefing notes, a little bit of me feels that they must be wrong. There is a little corner of me that is...

Member
Baroness Murphy (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 June 2009
Reference
711 c505-6GC
House
House of Lords

It may be a technical point, but it is a very important one. If attending a rehabilitation programme is going to have a different meaning in the Bill, then that should be made very clear.

Member
Baroness Murphy (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 June 2009
Reference
711 c521GC
House
House of Lords

I want to press the Minister on his previous remarks when he talked about medical treatment. There is a phrase in the Mental Health Act, and in other medical Acts, to the effect that medical treatment includes all treatment, habilitation and rehabilitation, and I am surprised that they appear to...

Member
Baroness Murphy (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 June 2009
Reference
711 c520GC
House
House of Lords

What would be the difference if the compulsory testing and urine sample provisions were left out? Why would it make any difference to these proposals?

Member
Baroness Murphy (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 June 2009
Reference
711 c513GC
House
House of Lords

If the noble Lord looks carefully at Schedule 3 he will find—I am not sure that I can find it immediately—that it is possible for the jobcentre to direct somebody to provide a urine sample if there is any suspicion that they are taking drugs and not turning up for...

Member
Baroness Murphy (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 June 2009
Reference
711 c507GC
House
House of Lords

Certainly requiring the attendance of an individual at a day centre, for example, comes under compulsory treatment.

Member
Baroness Murphy (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 June 2009
Reference
711 c520GC
House
House of Lords

I apologise to the Committee for my late arrival; I am swapping between Chambers today. I support the amendment. The wording of the noble Lord, Lord Skelmersdale, really encompasses some of the core problems that we have been trying to address throughout the Bill, particularly on people with mental health...

Member
Baroness Murphy (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 June 2009
Reference
711 c488GC
House
House of Lords

moved, as an amendment to the Motion that this House do agree with the Commons in their Amendment No. 4, at end insert ““but do propose the following amendment in lieu of the words so left out of the Bill: 4A: Page 6, line 19, at end insert- ““( )...

Member
Baroness Murphy (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 July 2007
Reference
693 c836-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, briefly, I support the noble Earl, Lord Howe, on the amendment. I do not want to repeat what I said in Committee, but many of our discussions throughout the passage of the Bill have been intended to ensure that people who are really in need of care and...

Member
Baroness Murphy (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 February 2007
Reference
689 c909
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am extremely grateful for the intervention of the noble Lord, Lord Soley, because he appears to have made a case for the amendment. People with serious personality disorders can be treated and should have access to treatment and the wide range of facilities available to them. The...

Member
Baroness Murphy (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 February 2007
Reference
689 c931-2
House
House of Lords