Skip to main content

1-20 of 869 results for subject:Finance

Member X
David Miliband

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Miliband, David (869)

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Can the Secretary of State confirm my figures that over £20 million has been spent in the north-east of England sacking PCT staff, that that money has come from funds previously earmarked for hospitals, and that there will be at least as many commissioning groups under his arrangements as there are currently PCTs employing managers in those roles? Does not that show that his plans are lunacy not reform, and that they should be taken away and put in the dustbin, not given a simple pause?
Asked by
David Miliband (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Health
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
7 June 2011
Reference
529 c2
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to follow the hon. Member for Central Suffolk and North Ipswich (Dr Poulter). I congratulate him on his important and interesting speech, and I wish to pick up his challenge. The choice is not between no reform and reform; it is between good reform and bad...

Member
David Miliband (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2011
Reference
522 c641-2
House
House of Commons

I am happy to wager the hon. Gentleman that the costs will turn out to be more like double those estimated and the savings more like half. The Bill is myopic, or ““deluded””, to use the word of the British Medical Journal, in three key areas, which I wish to...

Member
David Miliband (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2011
Reference
522 c642
House
House of Commons

No, I have given way once and I want to make some progress. If I have time, I will come back to the hon. Gentleman. All the matters that I have mentioned are to service a vision of health care as a regulated industry. The Secretary of State has engaged...

Member
David Miliband (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2011
Reference
522 c642-3
House
House of Commons

The benefits of memory are useful in politics, and perhaps my right hon. Friend's intervention will help the hon. Member for St Ives to decide how to vote in the Lobby tonight. Many people have asked why the Government are making these proposals at such breakneck speed. Surely it is...

Member
David Miliband (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2011
Reference
522 c643-4
House
House of Commons

Does my right hon. Friend agree that the most significant change in the Bill was not mentioned by the Secretary of State? It is that the Bill introduces price competition into a market that, up to now, has allowed competition only on quality. The London School of Economics, citing academic...

Member
David Miliband (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2011
Reference
522 c618
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what budget has been set for his Department's overseas counter-terrorism programme in 2010-11.

Asked by
David Miliband (Labour)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
13 July 2010
Reference
8153; 513 c622W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs how much has been spent from his Department's overseas counter-terrorism budget for 2010-11.

Asked by
David Miliband (Labour)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
13 July 2010
Reference
8155; 513 c620-1W
House
House of Commons

I, together with my right hon. Friends the Secretary of State for Defence and the Secretary of State for International Development, wish to inform the House about our plans for conflict funding for the next financial year. The 2007 comprehensive spending review settlement set the programme resources available for conflict...

Member
David Miliband (Labour)
Department
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Written statements
Date
25 March 2010
Reference
508 c57-8WS
House
House of Commons

Debate on a motion that this House has considered the matter of the Intelligence and Security Committee annual report (Cm 7807) and the government's response (Cm 7808).

Lead member
Kim Howells
Answering member
David Miliband
Department
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Debates
Date
18 March 2010
Reference
507 c990-1074
House
House of Commons

To be fair, I was coming on to that. We should always look at the Committee's procedures and its siting, meaning the Government body under which it works—that important issue was raised in previous reports—but we should also look at resources. As it happens, one issue that has been raised...

Member
David Miliband (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 March 2010
Reference
507 c1006
House
House of Commons

The agencies that the Committee holds accountable are responsible to me and to the Home Secretary. GCHQ and the SIS report to me and then to the Prime Minister, and the Security Service reports to the Home Secretary. However, I take the point of principle that my right hon. Friend...

Member
David Miliband (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 March 2010
Reference
507 c1008
House
House of Commons

Let me look into that. As the right hon. Gentleman will know from the numerous appearances that I have made in front of the Committee, I think that a culture of saying no to an idea because it has not been thought of before is absolutely hopeless in that regard....

Member
David Miliband (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 March 2010
Reference
507 c1007
House
House of Commons

I am very happy to do so. The Committee has raised some very important issues about the way in which the guidance is organised and phrased, and we want to ensure that we take them fully on board. I am going to meet the Committee again, with my right hon....

Member
David Miliband (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 March 2010
Reference
507 c1014
House
House of Commons

indicated dissent.

Member
David Miliband (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 March 2010
Reference
507 c1027
House
House of Commons

I can say that we will meet as soon as possible, given the travel commitments of the Committee, which is away next week, and those of myself on the Monday and Tuesday of the week after. Certainly, however, the guidance will be published without redactions. It is very important that...

Member
David Miliband (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 March 2010
Reference
507 c1011
House
House of Commons

Given that it seems that the Committee tabled the motion, not the Government, it is nice to be able to open a debate without having to apologise for something that the Government have done or failed to do. I will bear your comments in mind carefully, Mr. Deputy Speaker, as...

Member
David Miliband (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 March 2010
Reference
507 c1002-4
House
House of Commons

I completely accept that the right hon. Gentleman and other members of the Committee have gone back and forth on that issue. Public hearings need to go alongside more public discussion of the ISC's role in the accountability process. The first responsibility is for Ministers and agency heads to uphold...

Member
David Miliband (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 March 2010
Reference
507 c1006
House
House of Commons

I strongly agree—that is a good point.

Member
David Miliband (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 March 2010
Reference
507 c1005
House
House of Commons

I strongly agree. The ISC is not a normal committee. It looks at activities that are, by definition, abnormal. It is vital that the ring of secrecy is preserved. If it is not, the whole purpose of the Committee will be lost.

Member
David Miliband (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 March 2010
Reference
507 c1005
House
House of Commons