Skip to main content

1-20 of 26 results for subject:Biometrics

Member X
Patrick Mercer

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Mercer, Patrick (26)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

On a point of order, Madam Deputy Speaker. Perhaps I might seek some advice. Would it be in order for you to ask the Minister to conclude his speech, so that I might have time to withdraw my amendment?

Member
Patrick Mercer (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2005
Reference
437 c791
House
House of Commons

That is simply not the case. As the Minister is well aware, those terrorists attacked again within two weeks.

Member
Patrick Mercer (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2005
Reference
437 c728
House
House of Commons

I beg to move amendment No. 7, in page 7, line 20 [Clause 8], after ‘individual’, insert—

Member
Patrick Mercer (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2005
Reference
437 c770
House
House of Commons

That is a fair point. If that is the case, however, first, let us confirm that the biometrics and technology will work to allow that to happen. Secondly, why did the Home Secretary say in July that identity cards would not have affected the two sets of attacks? I do...

Member
Patrick Mercer (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2005
Reference
437 c727
House
House of Commons

That is not the point that the Government are making. The bombers in Spain were identified as a result of a number of basic mistakes that they made with the use of mobile phones. The fact that evidence had been well maintained and recorded, and had been used by both...

Member
Patrick Mercer (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2005
Reference
437 c727-8
House
House of Commons

It certainly played no role in preventing the bombings, although it helped when linked with telephone records. Had identity cards been on the bodies of the 7 July bombers, that would have been frightfully helpful; but that is not the point. The cards are not about trying to identify dead...

Member
Patrick Mercer (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2005
Reference
437 c728
House
House of Commons

We have been here so many times previously, and I am sure that the Under-Secretary, the hon. Member for Leigh (Andy Burnham), is sharpening his knife to prepare many of the arguments that I have heard twice in Committee and on which his knife has been blunted at least once....

Member
Patrick Mercer (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2005
Reference
437 c725-6
House
House of Commons

I am grateful for that intervention, and I will answer the hon. Gentleman by saying that it was my experience that this quasi-identity card—which was issued first in the mid-1970s, I think—had a converse effect to that which the Government sought. As he will remember, anybody who had such a...

Member
Patrick Mercer (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2005
Reference
437 c727
House
House of Commons

I beg to move amendment No. 8, in page 1, line 10, after ‘others’, insert ‘who reasonably require proof’.

Member
Patrick Mercer (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2005
Reference
437 c724
House
House of Commons

This simple amendment provides that an identity card issued to an individual must be free of charge. Ministers will not be surprised by the amendment, because we have already debated the point in Committee and will no doubt talk further about it tonight. The cost of the card is one...

Member
Patrick Mercer (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2005
Reference
437 c770-1
House
House of Commons

As always, I am grateful to my fellow Nottinghamshire Member of Parliament for his observations. If he will allow me to develop my argument, I am sure that he will receive full satisfaction—[Interruption.] Yes, for less than £30, I expect. I would be interested in the Minister’s view on how...

Member
Patrick Mercer (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2005
Reference
437 c771-2
House
House of Commons

As usual, the hon. Gentleman makes a useful and helpful intervention. Perhaps the Minister would be kind enough to outline exactly how much this scheme has already cost us, even before it has been approved by Parliament. How much of the national treasure has been invested in something that will—...

Member
Patrick Mercer (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2005
Reference
437 c772
House
House of Commons

I am sure that the hon. Gentleman will not surprised if I say that I have done no such calculation. As far as I am concerned, the scheme is not a starter. I have moved the amendment simply to challenge the Government and to make them explain how they can...

Member
Patrick Mercer (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2005
Reference
437 c772
House
House of Commons

The old aphorism relating to any form of computer or intelligence work is, ““Rubbish in, rubbish out.”” Unless we get it right from the first principles, the card and the register stand little chance of success.—[Interruption.] I seem to have had the desired effect on my own Benches.—[Laughter.] We are...

Member
Patrick Mercer (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2005
Reference
437 c731
House
House of Commons

The hon. and learned Gentleman as usual puts his finger on it. I hope that my earlier quote from Interpol illustrates exactly that point. Nothing that is claimed for the card has been proved to my satisfaction. The card claims much but in practice will deliver little. It changes with...

Member
Patrick Mercer (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2005
Reference
437 c732
House
House of Commons

Possibly, but such terrorists need not necessarily have false identities. Having a proper, pukka, legal, straightforward identity will not prevent terrorism. I was a serving soldier in Northern Ireland when the illustrated driving licence was introduced—it was introduced first with a photograph and then with a thumbprint—and we were told...

Member
Patrick Mercer (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2005
Reference
437 c730
House
House of Commons

I would not wish to stretch the House in any way, shape or form, and nor would I wish to stretch my credibility with the hon. Gentleman. I was trying to expand on, perhaps even dilate on, the point that a form of identity can—can—assist terrorists. Obviously, the circumstances in...

Member
Patrick Mercer (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2005
Reference
437 c729-30
House
House of Commons

Those questions certainly need to be answered, but I would suggest a prior question: will the card work? Is the technology capable of recording the various details to which my hon. Friend has just referred? I shall not test your patience further, Mr. Deputy Speaker, by digressing to answer that...

Member
Patrick Mercer (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2005
Reference
437 c730-1
House
House of Commons

As usual, I am grateful to my right hon. and learned Friend for his intervention. He is quite right that the carriage of the card—though the register may have some useful purposes—is not required by the Bill. Having sat through several Committee sittings, I know that we were told that...

Member
Patrick Mercer (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2005
Reference
437 c730
House
House of Commons

I can certainly confirm that the human rights elements of what might be called the Big Brother aspects of the card have been explored thoroughly in Committee. To my mind, those aspects are hugely disagreeable, but if the Government wish to control a population, put a population under surveillance or...

Member
Patrick Mercer (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2005
Reference
437 c731
House
House of Commons