Skip to main content

1-13 of 13 results for subject:USA

Member X
Michael Meacher
Subject X
Terrorism

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Meacher, Michael (13)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Terrorism (13)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

G8

The automatic transfer of tax information and the provision of registers of beneficial ownership appear to be no more than a wish list, since the communiqué says that countries “should” do those things, rather than “will”. What sanctions or pressures will be exerted against countries that refuse or fail to...

Member
Michael Meacher (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 June 2013
Reference
564 c902
House
House of Commons

No, I do not have the time. I believe that what I have described is a much better route to a safer world, and we are in pole position to take a global lead. Finally, let us not forget that over the past generation more nations have given up nuclear...

Member
Michael Meacher (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
458 c355
House
House of Commons

I am pleased to see the widespread support that I receive—at least on one side of the House! I would certainly reopen this decision, as I believe that consultation has not been adequate. I would like to see a consultation along the lines of the first strategic defence review, which...

Member
Michael Meacher (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
458 c353
House
House of Commons

No, I am not giving way again. Not only are the warheads designed by the US, but several crucial components without which the system could not work are manufactured in the US, and the system is also reliant on US software for all aspects of targeting. What is even more...

Member
Michael Meacher (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
458 c353-4
House
House of Commons

One cannot but draw encouragement from the fact that when occupants of both Front Benches come together in agreement there must be a good deal to be said for the opposite argument. So it is today. Like others, I do not believe that the Government have adequately or convincingly answered...

Member
Michael Meacher (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
458 c352
House
House of Commons

No, I am referring to a cost of £75 billion—I shall discuss that further in a moment—which is roughly 6 per cent. of GDP. It is substantially higher as a proportion of the defence budget. The post-cold war environment today is, of course, utterly different from 20 years ago and...

Member
Michael Meacher (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
458 c352-3
House
House of Commons

First, I have indicated that I do not think that it is an independent British nuclear deterrent. I have never taken the view that if we were to abandon the nuclear weapons that we have, Iran would immediately do the same. That argument does not hold. However, it could be...

Member
Michael Meacher (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2007
Reference
456 c435
House
House of Commons

As I have already made clear, I am critical of Iran for its abysmal record on human rights and in other respects. I was just about to come on to the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, which the hon. Gentleman mentioned. The truth is—of course, and as we all know—that the NPT...

Member
Michael Meacher (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2007
Reference
456 c435-6
House
House of Commons

In a wide-ranging debate, the Front-Bench spokesmen concentrated, quite naturally and properly, on the issues that face us in Iraq and Afghanistan. In addition to those continuing hostilities, two issues of overriding importance affect our stance on security. First, there is the question of our response to the growing evidence...

Member
Michael Meacher (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2007
Reference
456 c432-4
House
House of Commons

I would dispute whether that is the case—whether there is no satellite navigation involved. Irrespective of that, there are several other aspects of the system which are clearly dependent on the Americans. That is the key point. It is in no sense a genuinely independent British nuclear deterrent. Secondly, we...

Member
Michael Meacher (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2007
Reference
456 c434
House
House of Commons

There is obviously a distinction between the two, but if we are going to have a genuinely independent British nuclear deterrent, we need independence both in procurement and in firing and navigation. Thirdly, the central argument that is advanced is that however marginal and remote may be the contingency of...

Member
Michael Meacher (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2007
Reference
456 c434
House
House of Commons

I entirely agree with the hon. Gentleman about the nature of the Iranian regime, in particular about its oppression of human rights and its rejection of what we would regard as normal democratic politics. However, I think his position is that the UK’s possession of nuclear weapons is indispensable for...

Member
Michael Meacher (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2007
Reference
456 c406
House
House of Commons

To ask the Prime Minister, what representations he has received from the families of British victims of September 11 2001 concerning the investigation of (a) the events that took place in New York, Washington DC and Pennsylvania on that day and (b) the circumstances leading to those events; and if...

Asked by
Michael Meacher (Labour)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 March 2005
Reference
431 c1499W;431 c1493W; 220254;220255
House
House of Commons