Skip to main content

1-13 of 13 results for subject:USA

Member X
Michael Meacher
Subject X
Iran

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Meacher, Michael (13)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Iran (13)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Given the increasingly belligerent noises from the White House, will my right hon. Friend give a clear commitment that if there were a United States or Israeli military attack on Iran he would not support it militarily, logistically or politically?
Asked by
Michael Meacher (Labour)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
24 October 2007
Reference
465 c283
House
House of Commons
Asked by
Michael Meacher (Labour)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
24 October 2007
Reference
465 c283
House
House of Commons

First, I have indicated that I do not think that it is an independent British nuclear deterrent. I have never taken the view that if we were to abandon the nuclear weapons that we have, Iran would immediately do the same. That argument does not hold. However, it could be...

Member
Michael Meacher (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2007
Reference
456 c435
House
House of Commons

As I have already made clear, I am critical of Iran for its abysmal record on human rights and in other respects. I was just about to come on to the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, which the hon. Gentleman mentioned. The truth is—of course, and as we all know—that the NPT...

Member
Michael Meacher (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2007
Reference
456 c435-6
House
House of Commons

In a wide-ranging debate, the Front-Bench spokesmen concentrated, quite naturally and properly, on the issues that face us in Iraq and Afghanistan. In addition to those continuing hostilities, two issues of overriding importance affect our stance on security. First, there is the question of our response to the growing evidence...

Member
Michael Meacher (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2007
Reference
456 c432-4
House
House of Commons

I would dispute whether that is the case—whether there is no satellite navigation involved. Irrespective of that, there are several other aspects of the system which are clearly dependent on the Americans. That is the key point. It is in no sense a genuinely independent British nuclear deterrent. Secondly, we...

Member
Michael Meacher (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2007
Reference
456 c434
House
House of Commons

There is obviously a distinction between the two, but if we are going to have a genuinely independent British nuclear deterrent, we need independence both in procurement and in firing and navigation. Thirdly, the central argument that is advanced is that however marginal and remote may be the contingency of...

Member
Michael Meacher (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2007
Reference
456 c434
House
House of Commons

I entirely agree with the hon. Gentleman about the nature of the Iranian regime, in particular about its oppression of human rights and its rejection of what we would regard as normal democratic politics. However, I think his position is that the UK’s possession of nuclear weapons is indispensable for...

Member
Michael Meacher (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2007
Reference
456 c406
House
House of Commons

No, my time is running out. As for us, what moral authority do we have to say that Iran does not need nuclear weapons for self-protection when the UK Government are about to replace Trident with another round of nuclear weapons for exactly that quoted reason? The truth is that...

Member
Michael Meacher (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 January 2007
Reference
455 c1502-3
House
House of Commons

I am not sure what the hon. Gentleman is referring to. There is no question but that Israel has a very substantial number—generally reckoned to be well in excess of 200—of thermo-nuclear weapons. Of course, we do not know the targeting of those weapons, but it can be strongly expected...

Member
Michael Meacher (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 January 2007
Reference
455 c1501-2
House
House of Commons

I agree with my hon. Friend. This rearguard attempt to pre-empt the lion’s share of the remaining oil and the massive future profits over a 30-year period—there is no authority to extract it from another country without its agreement—can only intensify the insurgency. It is bound to foster much-increased resentment,...

Member
Michael Meacher (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 January 2007
Reference
455 c1501
House
House of Commons

This has been an important and poignant debate, not least because of the passionate speech that we have just listened to. However, I must say that the debate should not have been held on a motion to adjourn. The issue it addresses is crucial, and the Government should table a...

Member
Michael Meacher (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 January 2007
Reference
455 c1499-501
House
House of Commons
Supplementary on British position regarding US foreign policy on Iran.
Asked by
Michael Meacher (Labour)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
26 January 2005
Reference
430 c300
House
House of Commons