Skip to main content

1-20 of 92 results for subject:Redundancy

Member X
Pat McFadden

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
McFadden, Pat (92)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

rose—

Member
Pat McFadden (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2019
Reference
655 c372
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman is being typically generous in giving way to Members from all parts of the House. He was just referring to the position of other member states. Yesterday, the Prime Minister told us, for the first time, that she would countenance an extension to the article 50...

Member
Pat McFadden (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2019
Reference
655 c372
House
House of Commons

On the point about the purpose of an extension, what does my right hon. Friend think of President Macron saying that there is no way the EU would accept an extension without a “clear objective”? In his view, what should that clear objective be?

Member
Pat McFadden (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2019
Reference
655 c408
House
House of Commons

I am pleased to follow the hon. Member for South Dorset (Richard Drax), although I shall take a somewhat different tack. I shall make a couple of points about what the Prime Minister said yesterday about how things would be voted on in March, and about the related amendments on...

Member
Pat McFadden (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2019
Reference
655 c415
House
House of Commons

I think that it was a mistake to split them in that way, and I think that they need to be brought back together.

The future has been left blank. We know that we are leaving, and we are told that leave means leave, but leave to where, on what basis?...

Member
Pat McFadden (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2019
Reference
655 cc415-6
House
House of Commons

I will not, because others want to speak.

The fact that that is not being done is not because it is in the national interest to keep things vague or to have a blindfold Brexit. It is because facing up to those options would mean exposing the divisions in the Cabinet...

Member
Pat McFadden (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2019
Reference
655 cc416-7
House
House of Commons

The Secretary of State has said that staff should continue to turn up to work and that they will continue to be paid, but he has also said that he is setting up a helpline at Jobcentre Plus. What assurance can he give the staff—I am thinking particularly of the...

Member
Pat McFadden (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2018
Reference
634 c634
House
House of Commons

It is many years since the steelworks in my constituency closed. Some would say that the local economy has never fully recovered. My constituents therefore understand well the fear and worry that will exist in the community in south Wales and elsewhere in the country after the news today. Will...

Member
Pat McFadden (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2016
Reference
604 c1142
House
House of Commons

Is the Minister willing to invite potential buyers to the Department to talk about the Government's backing for manufacturing, what help might be available from the regional growth fund and all such issues that they might wish to discuss?

Member
Pat McFadden (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2012
Reference
542 c216WH
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend makes a good point. I mentioned the rebate to give an example of what the Government can do. They are not powerless when companies have a global choice about where to locate and produce. Before I ask the Minister some specific questions, let me say that I...

Member
Pat McFadden (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2012
Reference
542 c204-5WH
House
House of Commons

I, too, congratulate my hon. Friend the Member for Middlesbrough South and East Cleveland (Tom Blenkinsop) on securing the debate, which coincides with this afternoon's Budget statement. If press reports are true, the statement's main concern will be the tax affairs of people earning more than £150,000 a year. Our...

Member
Pat McFadden (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2012
Reference
542 c203-4WH
House
House of Commons

Seventeen hundred people will lose their jobs as a result of this statement, including 1,500 disabled people. The Minister's case rests on the argument that there are better ways to help disabled people into work than through Remploy. Will she therefore guarantee to come to the House six months after...

Member
Pat McFadden (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2012
Reference
541 c958
House
House of Commons

Will the Secretary of State tell the House what the cost to the Department of the redundancy payments in his announcement will be?

Member
Pat McFadden (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2011
Reference
524 c304
House
House of Commons

We have had many debates on post offices and Royal Mail in the House over the years, and we have often concentrated on the competition regime governing the different mail companies that are engaged in the delivery of mail. Less often, we have concentrated on the technological shift away from...

Member
Pat McFadden (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2010
Reference
517 c392-4
House
House of Commons

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills what the (a) voluntary and (b) involuntary redundancy rates were in the public sector in (i) Leeds North West constituency and (ii) each industrial category in each year since 1997.

Asked by
Greg Mulholland (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 March 2010
Reference
507 c930-1W; 322702
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what the (a) voluntary and (b) involuntary redundancy rates in the public sector were in each (i) region and (ii) industrial category in each year since 1997.

Asked by
David Amess (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 March 2010
Reference
507 c232-3W; 318686
House
House of Commons

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills what mechanisms are in place to protect the rights of employees who are likely to be made redundant; and what plans he has for the future of such mechanisms.

Asked by
Jim Cunningham (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
3 December 2009
Reference
501 c988W; 303867
House
House of Commons

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills how many employers in (a) Essex and (b) Castle Point sought advice on redundancy issues from his Department in (i) the latest period for which figures are available and (ii) the same period 12 months previously.

Asked by
Bob Spink (Independent (affiliation))
Answering body
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 July 2009
Reference
496 c1742W; 284951
House
House of Commons

Adjournment debate on the proposed closure of Diageo plants in Kilmarnock and Hurlford.

Lead member
Lord Browne of Ladyton
Answering member
Pat McFadden
Department
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
15 July 2009
Reference
496 c414-22
House
House of Commons

I congratulate my right hon. Friend the Member for Kilmarnock and Loudoun (Des Browne) on securing this debate. I have spoken to him about this issue several times in recent weeks, and I know how much it means to him and to his constituents. He is of course deeply concerned...

Member
Pat McFadden (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2009
Reference
496 c420-2
House
House of Commons