Skip to main content

1-20 of 35 results for subject:Defence

Member X
Julian Lewis
Session X
2016-17

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Lewis, Julian (35)
More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

May I helpfully suggest to the Minister that one way she could avoid these arguments about whether we have or have not scraped over the 2% line is to recognise that the last time we faced threats like those we face today was the 1980s, when we used to spend between 4.5% and 5% of GDP on defence? Let us settle for 3% so that we can avoid this sort of argument.

Asked by
Julian Lewis (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
13 March 2017
Reference
623 c11
House
House of Commons

The Government are certainly not breaking any NATO rules in calculating the 2%, but may I remind Ministers and hon. Members that 2% is a minimum? It is not a target, and we used to spend much more than 2% in the cold war years, as recently as the 1980s. Does the Secretary of State agree that even if all our NATO European allies were to meet the 2% pledge as a minimum, we would still be unable to deter an aggressive Russia without the wholehearted involvement of the United States, which is why the Prime Minister’s visit to President Trump was so absolutely important?

Asked by
Julian Lewis (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 January 2017
Reference
620 c645
House
House of Commons

Debate on a select committee report. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Julian Lewis
Answering member
Mike Penning
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Debates
Date
27 October 2016
Reference
616 cc179-208WH
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,

That this House has considered the Second Report from the Defence Committee of Session 2015-16, Shifting the goalposts? Defence expenditure and the 2% pledge, HC 494, and the Government response, HC 465.

It is a privilege to present the findings of our report entitled “Shifting the goalposts? Defence...

Member
Julian Lewis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2016
Reference
616 cc179-180WH
House
House of Commons

It is significant, and it is indeed included on the chart. The only reason why I did not mention it is that, in comparison with the total spent on the other high-spending Departments, it is a relatively small proportion of our GDP. However, my hon. Friend is absolutely right because,...

Member
Julian Lewis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2016
Reference
616 c180WH
House
House of Commons

We did not find a hard and fast case of double counting, but we noticed in the past that there are items of expenditure that are highly relevant to defence and security that could fairly and usefully be catered for by the international development funds. Given that the 0.7% is...

Member
Julian Lewis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2016
Reference
616 cc180-1WH
House
House of Commons

As always, I am delighted to be trumped by my hon. Friend in that direction. That is an absolutely splendid intervention and I thank him for it. I hope the Minister will go one better even and think of something to rhyme with five.

Member
Julian Lewis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2016
Reference
616 c181WH
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman is absolutely spot on, and of course that is what underlies my remarks about the fact that the figures are only, at best, the crudest guides. Nevertheless, they give us some sort of measure of comparison. Spending a certain amount of money on defence—or, should we...

Member
Julian Lewis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2016
Reference
616 c182WH
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman perfectly exhibits the cross-party basis on which we try to find agreement on such matters in Committee, and the extent to which we succeed in doing so. He is of course absolutely right.

I do not intend to speak much longer, because it is excellent to see...

Member
Julian Lewis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2016
Reference
616 cc183-4WH
House
House of Commons

I thank everybody who has contributed to the debate. We have had an excellent turnout for a quiet Thursday afternoon. The fact that so many people have given up their afternoon to take part in this debate and made such strong contributions, both from the Back and from the Front...

Member
Julian Lewis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2016
Reference
616 c208WH
House
House of Commons

I shall make a little more progress first.

My last point leads me to a second question. I hope that I have, in effect, shown that when the Labour Government of the day said to the House that they believed there were weapons of mass destruction they were not lying, and...

Member
Julian Lewis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2016
Reference
613 c447
House
House of Commons

Thank you very much for calling me, Mr Speaker. I shall endeavour to follow your injunction to be brief. There is a very good reason to be brief at this stage of consideration of the Chilcot report, and that is that we have had very little time to consider a...

Member
Julian Lewis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2016
Reference
613 cc442-3
House
House of Commons

That is very tricky, because there are two scenarios where we can go to war. One is quite straightforward: somebody attacks us and we get on with it, because we are given no choice. The other is a situation such as that under discussion, where we have reason to believe...

Member
Julian Lewis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2016
Reference
613 cc443-4
House
House of Commons

I agree with a great deal of what the right hon. Gentleman has just said. Although it is not a matter of primary concern to us now, the fact is that Saddam Hussein was the author of his own misfortune. We must remember that, apart from being a brutal dictator,...

Member
Julian Lewis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2016
Reference
613 c444
House
House of Commons

Yes, but the problem that the inspectors and we would always have faced was summed up by something that was said at the Hutton inquiry into the death of Dr David Kelly. I was going to quote this later, but I shall do so now. On 21 August 2003, I...

Member
Julian Lewis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2016
Reference
613 cc444-5
House
House of Commons

Yes, but I am taking a lot of interventions, and I am keen not to abuse the fact that I do not have a time limit.

Member
Julian Lewis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2016
Reference
613 c445
House
House of Commons

The answer to the second question is easy. What happened during those 13 years was the appearance on the international stage, in September 2001, of a group that had been around for a long time but had not previously succeeded in killing 3,000 people in the heart of New York...

Member
Julian Lewis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2016
Reference
613 c445
House
House of Commons

I do agree that al-Qaeda was not present in Iraq at the time, but that is not the point that I was making. The point that I was making was that the west was in a major stand-off with Saddam Hussein, and people use other groups and organisations for their...

Member
Julian Lewis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2016
Reference
613 c446
House
House of Commons

I am saying that I was absolutely right not to vote to remove Assad in 2013 and absolutely wrong to vote as I did in 2003, but that I did so because I believed what I was told about weapons of mass destruction and also believed—wrongly—that there was a chance...

Member
Julian Lewis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2016
Reference
613 c447
House
House of Commons

Never, ever, again is a strong statement, and when a conflict arises, especially when it is the result of unforeseen events, it is seldom the case that the armed forces are fully equipped in every respect. The history of our engagement in many conflicts is of a disastrous start that...

Member
Julian Lewis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2016
Reference
613 cc447-8
House
House of Commons