Skip to main content

1-20 of 48 results for subject:Information

Member X
Norman Lamb

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Lamb, Norman (48)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

As Chair of the Science and Technology Committee, I can confirm that it warmly welcomes the establishment of the centre. One of the issues the Government response to the consultation did not really cover was whether the centre’s remit will include the ability to advise on the need for clearer...

Member
Norman Lamb (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 November 2018
Reference
649 c752
House
House of Commons

That this House supports the work of the Emily Boards campaign to assist families and friends of victims of a major incident like the 7th July 2005 bombings in London; recognises that whilst hospitals and their staff are always under great pressure in these circumstances, the existing system provides little...

Primary sponsor
Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Early day motions
Date
1 March 2006
Reference
1736
House
House of Commons

To pick up on the point made by the hon. Member for Erewash (Liz Blackman) about flexible working for parents of teenage children, as the father of two teenagers I am acutely aware of the pressures of being a parent of children of that age. There is a strong case...

Member
Norman Lamb (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 December 2005
Reference
440 c661-3
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman for that intervention. He reminded me of something with which I wanted to deal. Clearly, the Minister must respond as the two responses by the Secretary of State were inconsistent. The right hon. Gentleman said that everything was subject to the affirmative process....

Member
Norman Lamb (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 December 2005
Reference
440 c665
House
House of Commons

The Minister mentions regulations. I am sure that he is about to get to it, but will he confirm precisely which of the regulations will be subject to the affirmative process rather than the alternative?

Member
Norman Lamb (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 December 2005
Reference
440 c705
House
House of Commons

I agree with what the hon. Lady is saying about redressing the balance between men and women as women become increasingly unequal as a result of time off relating to childbirth. Does she recognise, however, that the Government estimate in their regulatory impact assessment that it is possible that as...

Member
Norman Lamb (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 December 2005
Reference
440 c690
House
House of Commons

Perhaps I could give the Secretary of State an opportunity to intervene to clarify the matter. There seems to be complete confusion on the Government Benches. Labour Members seem remarkably reluctant to get to their feet. I am giving them the opportunity, here and now, to intervene. Let us hope...

Member
Norman Lamb (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 December 2005
Reference
440 c665-7
House
House of Commons

Indeed; it is to be hoped that that will be the case. Consultation can take place on the detail before a Bill is presented as well as before regulations. At this stage, while considering the Bill, we are not aware of much of the detail in the proposed legislation other...

Member
Norman Lamb (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 December 2005
Reference
440 c664
House
House of Commons

I entirely agree with that suggestion, which was well made. I hope that the Minister will respond positively to it. I am sure that he will.

Member
Norman Lamb (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 December 2005
Reference
440 c665
House
House of Commons

I agree with the hon. Gentleman. I was not aware of those figures, and I hope that in the wind up the Secretary of State or the Minister will confirm that that analysis will be shared with the Committee from the start, so that we can debate those issues properly....

Member
Norman Lamb (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 December 2005
Reference
440 c663-4
House
House of Commons

To return to the issue of flexible working and carers, the right hon. Gentleman’s response to an earlier intervention suggests that he is looking at a wide definition rather than one that applies to a narrow group of people, which would be of little value. Will he confirm that that...

Member
Norman Lamb (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 December 2005
Reference
440 c651
House
House of Commons

Will the Secretary of State give way?

Member
Norman Lamb (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 December 2005
Reference
440 c648
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the Secretary of State for his generosity. On the point that he just made, the Confederation of British Industry has suggested that any increase in annual leave entitlement to deal with bank holidays should be phased in to allow businesses to adjust. Does he have in...

Member
Norman Lamb (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 December 2005
Reference
440 c648
House
House of Commons

Will the Secretary of State give an idea of the current take-up of the entitlement to two weeks’ paternity pay? There is a great deal of concern that because the pay is quite low, and because of the straitjacket in terms of notice requirements and so on, the take-up is...

Member
Norman Lamb (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 December 2005
Reference
440 c644
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister do more than look at the information that comes in, as he describes it, and commission more authoritative research?

Member
Norman Lamb (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2005
Reference
436 c1041
House
House of Commons

I rise briefly to say that I support the importance of the new clause. Unless consumers are able to understand such provisions, there is not financial inclusion but ignorance of the requirements imposed on them. It must be right that someone who perhaps cannot speak English or who is blind...

Member
Norman Lamb (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2005
Reference
436 c999
House
House of Commons

I hope that the hon. Gentleman will be able to clarify an aspect of particular concern. As amendment No. 4 is drafted, the whole section would have no effect if there was no prejudice to the borrower, but the question is what we mean by prejudice. I agree with him...

Member
Norman Lamb (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2005
Reference
436 c1012-3
House
House of Commons

I absolutely understand the context and I am completely with the Minister in his aim of achieving transparency and responsible lending. I was talking about that earlier in relation to data sharing and it is absolutely the correct objective. That is why I generally support the test of unfairness. It...

Member
Norman Lamb (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2005
Reference
436 c1019
House
House of Commons

I am absolutely in agreement with the hon. Member for Wealden (Charles Hendry) in terms of the objectives of the new clause, but I am not entirely with him in terms of its content. I know where he is coming from, but I have concerns with subsection (3). There needs...

Member
Norman Lamb (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2005
Reference
436 c1006
House
House of Commons

That is a fair point. I have often known occasions where a case is pending, either in the High Court, the Appeal Court or the House of Lords, and it creates uncertainty. I suspect that these provisions will be tested in the courts, whether or not there is a framework,...

Member
Norman Lamb (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2005
Reference
436 c1006-7
House
House of Commons