Skip to main content

1-19 of 19 results for subject:Flats

Member X
Brian Jenkins

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Jenkins, Brian (19)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I should not like my comments to be taken out of context, when I said that members did not have the will because of the history of refusals being overturned by the inspectorate, thus costing council tax payers money. That is what takes the will away from them. It is...

Member
Brian Jenkins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2007
Reference
456 c512
House
House of Commons

Is my hon. Friend saying that as a member and therefore owner of a private tennis court, I would be prohibited from selling it and gaining, but as owner of a back garden I can sell it and gain? Where do we draw the line? I understand what my hon....

Member
Brian Jenkins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2007
Reference
456 c502
House
House of Commons

Has my hon. Friend encountered any cases in which a developer comes along knowing that he cannot obtain permission for 80 properties in a back garden or on a similar site and therefore applies for 40, gains permission, and then submits applications for 50, 60, 70 and finally 80, succeeding...

Member
Brian Jenkins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2007
Reference
456 c501
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is describing an important and complex situation. The incentive now is not to buy four large houses and develop the site as a large site, but to buy each house individually and develop each site separately. Those separate applications can be sneaked through. Does he agree that...

Member
Brian Jenkins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2007
Reference
456 c500
House
House of Commons

Now we are diverging a little. If I have one or two properties that have been derelict and a nuisance for many years and I want my local authority to clear them and generate new accommodation on that site, where do I stand? It is a brownfield site. I want...

Member
Brian Jenkins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2007
Reference
456 c504-5
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend must realise something. I have houses in green belt and I have great difficulty getting any work done on them, even changing windows. The local planning authority will quickly state that any extension or development is overdevelopment of a site. It is very protective, and it has...

Member
Brian Jenkins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2007
Reference
456 c505
House
House of Commons

Thank you, Mr. Deputy Speaker. I sometimes get a little carried away on planning, because I have spent so much time on the issue. Looking at the Bill, I understand what is being said. I must be careful not to be dragged down another route. You are right. The Bill...

Member
Brian Jenkins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2007
Reference
456 c488
House
House of Commons

Local councillors have the power now to deal with that. As I keep saying, the difficulty arises because of the drafting and terminology of the documents, and, more importantly, because of the culture that has been allowed to develop whereby inspectors overturn planning decisions. Local councillors do not feel that...

Member
Brian Jenkins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2007
Reference
456 c489
House
House of Commons

I applaud my hon. Friend for his understanding of the issue, and he would be right but for the fact that planning officers do not believe that they can advise planning committees to turn down applications. They believe that there is an overriding requirement to provide accommodation. I do not...

Member
Brian Jenkins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2007
Reference
456 c485-7
House
House of Commons

As I have said, I am not opposed to the Bill. I do not think that it will get through, but it is a good vehicle for putting the spotlight on and drawing attention to issues that the Government must face up to. Yes, local people should have a greater...

Member
Brian Jenkins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2007
Reference
456 c485
House
House of Commons

I appreciate what the hon. Gentleman says. However, the rules were laid down in a different era when a soft touch was more in keeping with the time. Additionally, they were laid down as guidance, and they were accompanied by a note explaining that A did not mean B, which...

Member
Brian Jenkins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2007
Reference
456 c490
House
House of Commons

That is the point that I am making. We have the problem that we seem to blame everything on such things as national targets. It is time to press the Minister for clarification on PPS3.

Member
Brian Jenkins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2007
Reference
456 c489
House
House of Commons

I am interested in the hon. Lady’s argument. That is why I asked about the comparison between the light-touch approach and the heavy, rigid legislation approach. Would you prefer to say that on no account—

Member
Brian Jenkins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2007
Reference
456 c493
House
House of Commons

I apologise, Mr. Deputy Speaker. Would the hon. Lady care to draft an example of legislation that she thinks would control the problem or does she think that no development at all should take place on former residential sites?

Member
Brian Jenkins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2007
Reference
456 c493
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend mentions large-scale development. Does he realise that what we are concerned about is the cumulative effect of lots of small-scale developments in an area, all of which are treated individually rather than collectively?

Member
Brian Jenkins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2007
Reference
456 c497
House
House of Commons

Is my hon. Friend here to speak up to safeguard the rights of developers?

Member
Brian Jenkins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2007
Reference
456 c496
House
House of Commons

First, I congratulate the hon. Member for Meriden (Mrs. Spelman). The proposals pushed in the Bill provide a service that will put you in good stead, in respect of planning authorities, up and down the country. When I say ““you””, I mean the hon. Lady rather than you, Mr. Deputy...

Member
Brian Jenkins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2007
Reference
456 c482-3
House
House of Commons

I understand where the hon. Lady is coming from, but I live in the particular town of Tamworth, which has 80,000 people and is four miles across—I repeat, four miles across. It has no large green open spaces. Although I agree with the sentiments behind the Bill, it will be...

Member
Brian Jenkins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2007
Reference
456 c484
House
House of Commons

I understand where the right hon. Gentleman is coming from. Of course, in any representative democracy, we have different levels. We have a regional participant to make representations on what development each area can stand and what each area requires. It is incumbent on the local authority to pass up...

Member
Brian Jenkins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2007
Reference
456 c485
House
House of Commons