Skip to main content

1-20 of 147 results for subject:"House of Commons"

Member X
Bernard Jenkin

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Jenkin, Bernard (147)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I hope the House will forgive me if I detain the House for a few moments while I explain a bit about this report, because it is the first time that a case of this nature has come before the Committee and been adjudicated upon. Normally it would be the...

Member
Bernard Jenkin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2022
Reference
707 cc466-8
House
House of Commons

Motion that this House – (1) approves the fifth report of the Committee on Standards, HC 1036; (2) endorses the recommendations in paragraphs 78 and 79; and (3) accordingly suspends Daniel Kawczynski from the service of the House for a period of one sitting day, on Thursday 20 January. Agreed...

Lead member
Jacob Rees-Mogg
Answering member
Bernard Jenkin
Department
Leader of the House of Commons; Committee on Standards
Type
Debates on select committee reports
Date
19 January 2022
Reference
707 cc465-470
House
House of Commons

I just misled the House. The hon. Member for Perth and North Perthshire (Pete Wishart) would not have to swear allegiance to the Crown; he would have the oath administered to him. So it is rather like having an injection; it is just given to you. Whether we like it...

Member
Bernard Jenkin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2020
Reference
684 c883
House
House of Commons

I entirely support the idea that we should bring on to the panel people who have juridical experience in the courts, and I commend my right hon. Friend and the Commission for appointing to the chair of this body an ex-High Court judge. That is exactly the kind of authority,...

Member
Bernard Jenkin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2020
Reference
684 c878
House
House of Commons

I am here as a member of the Standards Committee, which has absolutely no jurisdiction over the adjudication of any ICGS case, but it certainly falls within the remit of the Standards Committee to keep a watching policy brief on how the ICGS develops and whether we want to inquire...

Member
Bernard Jenkin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2020
Reference
684 c881
House
House of Commons

I rise only briefly, as an observer rather than a participant. As I pointed out a minute ago, the Standards Committee has no role in this, though we were consulted about the shape of the final process that should adjudicate the appeal cases in the ICGS scheme and we took...

Member
Bernard Jenkin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2020
Reference
684 cc882-3
House
House of Commons

May I report to the House through you, Mr Speaker, that the Liaison Committee met last week and discussed this matter at some length? Will my right hon. Friend respect how strongly many Chairs of Select Committees feel that a significant number of them are unable to carry out their...

Member
Bernard Jenkin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 November 2020
Reference
684 c35
House
House of Commons

I have been listening carefully to what my right hon. Friend has been saying, and he has laid great emphasis on saving the building of the Palace of Westminster, but can he just clarify that it is the Government’s policy that it should be saved so that it should be...

Member
Bernard Jenkin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2020
Reference
678 c1739
House
House of Commons

Will the right hon. Lady clarify the review being conducted by the Sponsor Body? Presumably, the Sponsor Body is allowed to conclude that the full decant is no longer regarded as the most cost-effective option, or is she serving notice that because the House has voted it through by, I...

Member
Bernard Jenkin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2020
Reference
678 c1742
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to follow the hon. Member for Rhondda (Chris Bryant), who speaks with great passion about this building and great knowledge about the challenges we face. All I plead for is realism. We have a clear objective: that this great building should remain the home of our...

Member
Bernard Jenkin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2020
Reference
678 cc1759-1761
House
House of Commons

May I return to the question raised by my right hon. Friend the Member for Chipping Barnet (Theresa Villiers) to contest my hon. Friend the Minister’s rather doubtful assertion that this is normal for an international treaty? I do not know of any other international treaty where one of the...

Member
Bernard Jenkin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2019
Reference
656 c1068
House
House of Commons

The point raised by the hon. Member for Huddersfield (Mr Sheerman) is a very salient one. We spend an awful lot of time looking at processes and procedures, writing down codes and adjusting rules, and very little time thinking about how we change the culture. It is not about the...

Member
Bernard Jenkin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 November 2018
Reference
648 c1278
House
House of Commons

This point about training is very contentious. I am afraid that Members of Parliament are not civil servants. It is only recently in the history of the House of Commons that Members of Parliament were considered even to be employed in legal terms. Until the mid ’60s we were self-employed....

Member
Bernard Jenkin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 November 2018
Reference
648 c1285
House
House of Commons

I follow the right hon. Member for Carshalton and Wallington (Tom Brake) who sits on the Commission, and I am grateful for his account of the Commission’s discussions and intentions. He threw into his remarks references to culture, and “culture” is a word that drops into this debate quite easily....

Member
Bernard Jenkin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 November 2018
Reference
648 cc1298-9
House
House of Commons

The Leader of the House is completely right that we do not yet have anything like enough information to evaluate which option the House should now pursue. I was predisposed to support the decant proposal, but I regret to tell the Chair of the Public Accounts Committee, the hon. Member...

Member
Bernard Jenkin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2018
Reference
635 c886
House
House of Commons

May I welcome my right hon. Friend’s statement and join him in thanking Lord Strathclyde for his report? The Government could not have chosen a safer pair of hands for such an inquiry, and of course it does avoid the whole issue of the composition and other aspects of the...

Member
Bernard Jenkin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 December 2015
Reference
603 c1743
House
House of Commons

I thank my right hon. Friend for the announcement made yesterday and assure him that the Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee

requires no instructions from the Government about what inquiries we will carry out, and nor does it require any prompting from the Opposition.

At our meeting yesterday, we started...

Member
Bernard Jenkin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2015
Reference
601 cc351-2
House
House of Commons

Thank you for the early warning, Mr Deputy Speaker.

It is my privilege to follow the Father of the House, who, in his now customary fashion, stilled this House with his wisdom. I think we should listen carefully to what he said and take on board the points he made. The...

Member
Bernard Jenkin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2015
Reference
600 c1197
House
House of Commons

I am not going to give way.

We are carrying out an evaluation of English votes for English laws that perhaps looks to a new settlement in the United Kingdom—what it might look like and what the financial consequences might be. This might finish up with exactly the kind of Joint...

Member
Bernard Jenkin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2015
Reference
600 c1198
House
House of Commons

The logic of the SNP’s position is to advocate an English Parliament, but what would happen to Barnett consequentials then?

Member
Bernard Jenkin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2015
Reference
600 c1201
House
House of Commons